Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AST cleanup: explicit representation for optional record fields in ty… #7190

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2024

Conversation

cristianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

…pes.

Base automatically changed from ast-cleanup-exp-object to master December 4, 2024 11:40
@cristianoc cristianoc force-pushed the types-optional-record-fields branch from a793751 to 7fdf2b5 Compare December 4, 2024 12:45
@cristianoc cristianoc requested review from cknitt and zth December 4, 2024 12:45
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Syntax Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.05.

Benchmark suite Current: 7fdf2b5 Previous: e1b7fb7 Ratio
Parse RedBlackTree.res - time/run 1.2990018866666666 ms 1.2123143266666667 ms 1.07

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Copy link
Member

@cknitt cknitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So nice! 🎉

Copy link
Collaborator

@zth zth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fantastic!

@cristianoc cristianoc merged commit 6a30fa2 into master Dec 4, 2024
20 checks passed
@cristianoc cristianoc deleted the types-optional-record-fields branch December 4, 2024 14:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants