Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: export #1106

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2020
Merged

refactor: export #1106

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 15, 2020

Conversation

cap-Bernardito
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

refactor export

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1106 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1106      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   97.80%   97.78%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          10       10              
  Lines         546      542       -4     
  Branches      175      169       -6     
==========================================
- Hits          534      530       -4     
  Misses         11       11              
  Partials        1        1              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/utils.js 98.99% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 88e86ab...ef75d7b. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 56c0427 into master Jul 15, 2020
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the refactor-exports branch July 15, 2020 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants