Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Nov 27, 2023. It is now read-only.

Rewrite spec to use generic List/Records #2

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021
Merged

Rewrite spec to use generic List/Records #2

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 15, 2021

Conversation

jridgewell
Copy link
Member

This should pave the way for TypedArray support.

This should pave the way for TypedArray support.
Copy link
Contributor

@bakkot bakkot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM other than the comment about ~empty~. Also this is better anyway.

jridgewell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
This builds on #2 to add `TypedArray` support, where the values of the objects are instances of the `TypedArray` class.
jridgewell and others added 3 commits July 15, 2021 01:39
@jridgewell jridgewell merged commit f603437 into main Jul 15, 2021
@jridgewell jridgewell deleted the list-o-lists branch July 15, 2021 06:05
jridgewell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
This builds on #2 to add `TypedArray` support, where the values of the objects are instances of the `TypedArray` class.
@jridgewell jridgewell mentioned this pull request Jul 15, 2021
jridgewell added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 15, 2021
* Add TypedArray Support

This builds on #2 to add `TypedArray` support, where the values of the objects are instances of the `TypedArray` class.

* Update spec.emu

Co-authored-by: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>

* Fix merge conflict with changed numbers

* Fix bug link bug

* Update spec.emu

Co-authored-by: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>

* fixup: [spec] `npm run build`

Co-authored-by: Kevin Gibbons <bakkot@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants