Skip to content

Conversation

@rastogishubham
Copy link

@rastogishubham rastogishubham commented Jul 15, 2022

This is mainly done because with #4778 one of the changes I have made is to have a reference from the debug-info cas block to the debug-abbrev cas block. It is more useful to have the Block CAS ID instead of the BlockData CAS ID in the --print-cas-tree output because then I can verify that the debug-info block has a reference to the debug-abbrev block using the --ls-node-refs command in llvm-cas.

…of the BlockData CAS ID for the NestedV1 ingestion schema
@rastogishubham
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci please test

Copy link

@cachemeifyoucan cachemeifyoucan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think we care in general about which CASID is printed. LGTM to pick whichever works better for you.

@rastogishubham rastogishubham merged commit 45ea52e into swiftlang:experimental/cas/main Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants