Skip to content

Conversation

@christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

We now also check field names for potential placeholder matches to ensure those are registered for binding parameters.


Should be backported to 1.6.x (applies clean) as well as 1.5.x (some minor merge conflicts there, nothing serious, easy to resolve).

…tly.

We now also check field names for potential placeholder matches to ensure those are registered for binding parameters.

Original pull request: #233.
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
…tly.

We now also check field names for potential placeholder matches to ensure those are registered for binding parameters.

Original pull request: #233.
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
…tly.

We now also check field names for potential placeholder matches to ensure those are registered for binding parameters.

Original pull request: #233.
thomasdarimont pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 22, 2014
…tly.

We now also check field names for potential placeholder matches to ensure those are registered for binding parameters.

Original pull request: #233.
@thomasdarimont
Copy link

cp'd into master via: f845382, 1.6.x via: 93ae681.
Backported to 1.5.x via: 08e534a.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants