Skip to content

DATAMONGO-926 - Avoid StackOverflowError while resolving index structures. #180

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

christophstrobl
Copy link
Member

We now guard cyclic non transient, non DBRef property references while inspecting domain types for potentially index structures. To do so we check on the properties path and owning type to determine potential cycles. If found we log a warn message pointing to path, entity and property potentially causing problems and skip processing for this path.

… structures.

Given the structure reported in DATAMONGO-926 we created a test trying to reproduce the issue.
…ures.

We now guard cyclic non transient, non DBRef property references while inspecting domain types for potentially index structures. To do so we check on the properties path and owning type to determine potential cycles. If found we log a warn message pointing to path, entity and property potentially causing problems and skip processing for this path.
christophstrobl added a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2014
…ures.

We now guard cyclic non transient, non DBRef property references while inspecting domain types for potentially index structures. To do so we check on the properties path and owning type to determine potential cycles. If found we log a warn message pointing to path, entity and property potentially causing problems and skip processing for this path.

Original pull request: #180.
@odrotbohm odrotbohm closed this May 19, 2014
@odrotbohm odrotbohm deleted the issue/DATAMONGO-926 branch May 19, 2014 17:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants