Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

StructuredLoggingJsonProperties customizer should be a Class reference rather than a String #43202

Closed
philwebb opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

StructuredLoggingJsonProperties customizer should be a Class reference rather than a String #43202

philwebb opened this issue Nov 16, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
@philwebb
Labels
type: bug A general bug
Milestone
3.4.0

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

The StructuredLoggingJsonProperties contains a customizer type that should really be a Class reference rather than a String. This will avoid the need for additional metadata.
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 3.4.0 milestone Nov 16, 2024
@philwebb philwebb added type: enhancement A general enhancement type: bug A general bug and removed type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Nov 16, 2024
@philwebb philwebb changed the title Use Class reference rather than String for StructuredLoggingJsonProperties customizer StructuredLoggingJsonProperties customizer should be a Class reference rather than a String Nov 16, 2024
@philwebb philwebb self-assigned this Nov 16, 2024
@philwebb philwebb mentioned this issue Nov 16, 2024
Closed
@Netyyyy Netyyyy mentioned this issue Dec 4, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@philwebb philwebb

Labels
type: bug A general bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
3.4.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@philwebb