Exclude either by defining or by changing the default. #33
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Ok, looks like that conflicts with the changes you made earlier. I can get back to this in a bit. |
lutorm
force-pushed
the
include-fonts-individually
branch
from
3fa4528 to
e2fe602
Compare
|
Resolved and cleaned up comments. |
|
Thank you Patrik (@lutorm ), |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@PaulZC Ok, how's this? You can now exclude fonts either by defining the macro externally to the file or by changing the default in the file. I think editing the macros is cleaner than commenting out the includes.