Add support for RSC #1644
Add support for RSC #1644
Conversation
WalkthroughThe commit introduces comprehensive updates across the project to improve React Server Components and Redux store management. New helper methods now handle NDJSON streaming using fibers, and additional configuration options and TypeScript types support asynchronous store/component registration. Asset resolution, webpack bundle handling, and client/server component registration have been refactored. Several tests, build configurations, and documentation files have been updated accordingly to reflect the new streaming, error management, and lifecycle handling functionality. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant ReactOnRailsHelper
participant Fiber
participant Renderer
Client->>ReactOnRailsHelper: rsc_payload_react_component(component, options)
ReactOnRailsHelper->>Fiber: run_stream_inside_fiber (initialize streaming)
Fiber->>Renderer: Generate NDJSON chunks (html, metadata)
Renderer-->>Fiber: Return streaming data chunks
Fiber-->>ReactOnRailsHelper: Yield streaming output
ReactOnRailsHelper-->>Client: Return NDJSON stream
sequenceDiagram
participant Browser
participant ClientStartup
participant Renderer
Browser->>ClientStartup: onPageLoaded event
ClientStartup->>Renderer: renderOrHydrateForceLoadedComponents()
Renderer-->>ClientStartup: Components hydrated
ClientStartup-->>Browser: Components rendered successfully
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (4)
spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js (1)
7-7: Add a comment explaining the alias mapping.Adding a comment to explain why the
streamalias is needed would improve maintainability.+ // Alias for stream module to ensure compatibility with browser environments stream: 'stream-browserify'spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js (1)
7-7: Add a comment explaining the fallback configuration.Adding a comment to explain why the
streamfallback is needed would improve maintainability.+ // Fallback configuration for stream module to ensure compatibility with browser environments clientConfig.resolve.fallback = { stream: require.resolve('stream-browserify') };node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (2)
13-20: Handle the absence ofAsyncLocalStoragemore robustly.Consider providing more details in the log message or handling the absence of
AsyncLocalStoragein a way that informs the user of potential limitations.- console.log('AsyncLocalStorage not found'); + console.warn('AsyncLocalStorage not found. Some features may not work as expected.');
29-76: Ensure comprehensive test coverage forserverRenderRSCReactComponent.Given the complexity of this function, ensure that it is comprehensively tested, especially for error handling and edge cases.
- No references to
serverRenderRSCReactComponentwere found in the existing test files.Analysis chain
Ensure comprehensive test coverage for
serverRenderRSCReactComponent.Given the complexity of this function, ensure that it is comprehensively tested, especially for error handling and edge cases.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if comprehensive tests are provided for `serverRenderRSCReactComponent`. # Test: Search for test cases related to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent`. Expect: Comprehensive test cases. rg --type javascript --type typescript 'serverRenderRSCReactComponent'Length of output: 105
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if comprehensive tests are provided for `serverRenderRSCReactComponent`. # Test: Search for test cases related to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent`. Expect: Comprehensive test cases. rg --type js --type ts 'serverRenderRSCReactComponent'Length of output: 488
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if comprehensive tests are provided for `serverRenderRSCReactComponent`. # Step 1: Find all test files in the repository. test_files=$(fd --type f --extension js --extension ts --glob '*test*') # Step 2: Search for references to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` in the identified test files. if [ -n "$test_files" ]; then rg 'serverRenderRSCReactComponent' $test_files else echo "No test files found." fiLength of output: 1289
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (11)
- lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (4 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1 hunks)
- node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (4 hunks)
- node_package/src/types/index.ts (2 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js (1 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (26)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (3)
22-27: LGTM!The
stringToStreamfunction is correctly implemented.
78-79: LGTM!The export statements are correctly implemented.
1-4: Ensure type definitions are added for the modules.The
@ts-expect-errorcomments indicate that type definitions are pending. Ensure these are added to avoid type errors.Verification successful
Ensure type definitions are added for the modules.
The
@ts-expect-errorcomments indicate that type definitions are pending for therenderToReadableStreamandPassThroughmodules. Ensure these are added to avoid type errors.
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if type definitions for the modules are added or tracked in the codebase. # Test: Search for type definition files or TODO comments. Expect: Type definitions or tracking comments. rg --type typescript -A 2 '@ts-expect-error'Length of output: 79
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify if type definitions for the modules are added or tracked in the codebase. # Test: Search for type definition files or TODO comments. Expect: Type definitions or tracking comments. rg --type-add 'ts:*.ts' -A 2 '@ts-expect-error'Length of output: 883
package.json (5)
23-23: LGTM!Updating
@types/reactto^18.2.0ensures better type safety and compatibility with the latest React version.
24-24: LGTM!Updating
@types/react-domto^18.2.0ensures better type safety and compatibility with the latest React version.
49-49: LGTM! Verify the usage of the new dependency.Adding
react-server-dom-webpackenhances server-side rendering capabilities.However, ensure that the new dependency is correctly utilized in the codebase.
Verification successful
Verified Usage of
react-server-dom-webpackThe
react-server-dom-webpackdependency is correctly utilized in the codebase, specifically innode_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts.
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts: Import and usage ofrenderToReadableStreamfromreact-server-dom-webpack/server.edge.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `react-server-dom-webpack`. Expect: Correct usage of the new dependency. rg --type js -A 5 $'react-server-dom-webpack'Length of output: 44
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new dependency in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `react-server-dom-webpack` in all file types. rg -A 5 'react-server-dom-webpack' # Test: Search for import statements that might alias `react-server-dom-webpack`. rg -A 5 'import .* from .*react-server-dom-webpack'Length of output: 1847
5-10: LGTM! Verify the usage of new entry points.The addition of the
exportsfield enhances module interoperability by specifying entry points for both server-side and default usage.However, ensure that the new entry points are correctly utilized in the codebase.
47-48: LGTM! Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase.Updating
reactandreact-domto18.3.0-canary-670811593-20240322aligns with modern React practices but ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase.Verification successful
Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase.
Updating
reactandreact-domto18.3.0-canary-670811593-20240322aligns with modern React practices but ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase by checking for deprecated or breaking changes.
Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase.
Updating
reactandreact-domto18.3.0-canary-670811593-20240322aligns with modern React practices but ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase by conducting a comprehensive check.
LGTM! Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase.
Updating
reactandreact-domto18.3.0-canary-670811593-20240322aligns with modern React practices. The search did not reveal any deprecated lifecycle methods or breaking changes. Ensure compatibility with the rest of the codebase by conducting manual verification if necessary.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of `react` and `react-dom`. Expect: No compatibility issues. rg --type js -A 5 $'react' rg --type js -A 5 $'react-dom'Length of output: 44790
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase for deprecated or breaking changes. # Test: Search for deprecated React lifecycle methods that might be affected by the update. rg --type js -A 5 'componentWillMount|componentWillReceiveProps|componentWillUpdate' # Test: Search for usage of ReactDOM methods that might have breaking changes. rg --type js -A 5 'ReactDOM.render|ReactDOM.hydrate|ReactDOM.createPortal'Length of output: 163
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify compatibility with the rest of the codebase for React components and ReactDOM usages. # Test: Search for all React component definitions. rg --type js -A 5 'React.Component|React.PureComponent|function\s+\w+\s*\(' # Test: Search for all ReactDOM usages. rg --type js -A 5 'ReactDOM.render|ReactDOM.hydrate|ReactDOM.createRoot|ReactDOM.hydrateRoot'Length of output: 10621
lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (2)
106-108: LGTM!The
stream?method provides a straightforward way to query the:stream?option.
110-112: LGTM!The
rsc?method provides a straightforward way to query the:rsc?option.node_package/src/types/index.ts (2)
142-142: LGTM! Verify the implementation of the new method.The
serverRenderRSCReactComponentmethod enhances performance and user experience by enabling progressive rendering.However, ensure that the new method is correctly implemented in the codebase.
141-141: LGTM! Verify the implementation of the new method.The
streamServerRenderedReactComponentmethod enhances performance and user experience by enabling progressive rendering.However, ensure that the new method is correctly implemented in the codebase.
Verification successful
The
streamServerRenderedReactComponentmethod is correctly implemented.The method is defined in
serverRenderReactComponent.tsand handles the streaming of server-rendered React components usingReactDOMServer.renderToPipeableStream. It also includes error handling to manage exceptions during rendering.
- Implementation found in
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.tsfrom lines 209 to 249.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the implementation of the new method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the implementation of `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. Expect: Correct implementation of the new method. rg --type ts -A 5 $'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 2064
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `streamServerRenderedReactComponent` method. # Test: Retrieve the implementation details of `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. rg --type ts -A 20 $'export const streamServerRenderedReactComponent = (options: RenderParams) => {'Length of output: 321
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `streamServerRenderedReactComponent` method. # Test: Retrieve the implementation details of `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. rg --type ts -A 50 $'export const streamServerRenderedReactComponent = \\(options: RenderParams\\) => {'Length of output: 327
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the full implementation of the `streamServerRenderedReactComponent` method using ast-grep. # Test: Retrieve the implementation details of `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'export const streamServerRenderedReactComponent = (options: RenderParams) => { $$$ }'Length of output: 3488
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (3)
1-2: Update import statements forReactandPipeableStream.The import of
ReactandPipeableStreamfromreact-dom/serveraligns with the new stream-based rendering approach.
74-101: Implement stream-based rendering usingrenderToPipeableStream.The new implementation uses
renderToPipeableStreamfor stream-based rendering. This approach enhances performance and allows for asynchronous processing of the rendered output. Ensure that the stream is correctly handled and errors are properly managed.
209-249: IntroducestreamServerRenderedReactComponentfunction.The new function encapsulates the logic for rendering a React component into a stream. It checks for conditions and handles errors appropriately. This addition enhances the server-side rendering capabilities by supporting stream-based rendering.
lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (3)
Line range hint
69-92:
Redefinebundle_js_file_pathmethod.The method now includes a new parameter
bundle_name, allowing it to handle different bundle names dynamically. This change enhances the flexibility and robustness of the method.
96-110: Updateserver_bundle_js_file_pathmethod.The method now uses the new
bundle_js_file_pathmethod, aligning with the new structure for managing bundle paths. This update enhances maintainability and clarity.
112-117: Introducersc_bundle_js_file_pathmethod.The new method handles the RSC bundle path, following the same pattern as the
server_bundle_js_file_pathmethod. This addition improves the modularity and configurability of the code.lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (1)
95-99: Introduceexec_server_render_streaming_jsmethod.The new method handles JavaScript code execution in a streaming manner. It accepts three parameters:
js_code,render_options, and an optionaljs_evaluator. This addition expands the capabilities of the module by allowing for streaming JavaScript execution.node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2)
245-251: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
streamServerRenderedReactComponentare correctly implemented.
253-260: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that the function
serverRenderRSCReactComponentis not mistakenly invoked in the wrong context.Verification successful
The function
serverRenderRSCReactComponentis not mistakenly invoked in the wrong context.
- The function is defined in
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.tsand throws an error if invoked.- It is referenced in
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.tsandnode_package/src/types/index.ts, but no invocations were found outside these contexts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct implementation of the function calls. rg --type ts -A 5 $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent'Length of output: 1445
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of the function usage in `node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts` and `node_package/src/types/index.ts`. # Search for the function usage in `node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts` with more context lines. rg --type ts -A 10 -B 10 $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent' node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts # Search for the function usage in `node_package/src/types/index.ts` with more context lines. rg --type ts -A 10 -B 10 $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent' node_package/src/types/index.tsLength of output: 1701
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` is not mistakenly invoked outside the intended context. # Search for invocations of `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` across the codebase. rg --type ts $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent('Length of output: 158
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` is not mistakenly invoked outside the intended context. # Search for invocations of `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` across the codebase with corrected regex pattern. rg --type ts 'serverRenderRSCReactComponent\('Length of output: 252
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (5)
480-484: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
internal_rsc_react_componentare correctly implemented.
113-121: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
stream_react_component_asyncare correctly implemented.
103-111: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
stream_react_componentare correctly implemented.Verification successful
Verified: The function usage of
stream_react_componentis correctly implemented.The only usage of
stream_react_componentis within thestream_react_component_asyncmethod, and it is used appropriately in an asynchronous context.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `stream_react_component` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct implementation of the function calls. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'stream_react_component'Length of output: 1048
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `stream_react_component` are correctly implemented across the entire codebase. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct implementation of the function calls. rg --type ruby 'stream_react_component'Length of output: 319
94-101: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
rsc_react_componentare correctly implemented.
393-417: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentare correctly implemented.Verification successful
Verify the function call context in the codebase.
The function
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentis called within the same file where it is defined. Ensure that the parametersresult[:result],result[:tag], andresult[:render_options]are correctly defined and passed in the calling context.
Verify the function call context in the codebase.
The previous script failed due to a regex parse error. Let's correct the search pattern and re-run the script to verify the context of the function call to
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content.
Verify the return value of the
internal_react_componentmethod.The function call to
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentis found within thestream_react_componentmethod. We need to verify theinternal_react_componentmethod to ensure that it returns a hash with the keys:result,:tag, and:render_options.
Verify the complete implementation of the
internal_react_componentmethod.We need to see the full implementation of the
internal_react_componentmethod to confirm if it returns a hash with the keys:result,:tag, and:render_options.
Function usage verified successfully.
The function
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentis correctly implemented and called within the codebase. Theinternal_react_componentmethod returns a hash with the keys:render_options,:tag, and:result, ensuring that the parameters passed tobuild_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentare correctly defined.
stream_react_componentmethod callsinternal_react_component, which returns the necessary keys.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct implementation of the function calls. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content'Length of output: 994
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of the function call to `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content` to ensure the parameters are correctly defined and passed. # Search for the context around the function call to examine the definition of `result`. rg --type ruby -A 10 -B 10 $'build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content('Length of output: 253
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the context of the function call to `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content` to ensure the parameters are correctly defined and passed. # Search for the context around the function call to examine the definition of `result`. rg --type ruby -A 10 -B 10 $'build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content\('Length of output: 3034
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the return value of the `internal_react_component` method to ensure it returns a hash with the keys `:result`, `:tag`, and `:render_options`. # Search for the definition of the `internal_react_component` method. rg --type ruby -A 10 $'def internal_react_component'Length of output: 989
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the complete implementation of the `internal_react_component` method. # Search for the complete implementation of the `internal_react_component` method. rg --type ruby -A 50 -B 10 $'def internal_react_component'Length of output: 4813
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
4e3ad5b to
440511d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (1)
253-260: LGTM! Consider adding a more descriptive error message.The implementation looks good. Consider providing more context in the error message to help developers understand why this method is not supported.
- throw new Error('serverRenderRSCReactComponent is supported in RSC bundle only.'); + throw new Error('serverRenderRSCReactComponent is supported in RSC bundle only. Ensure you are using the correct bundle for React Server Components.');CHANGELOG.md (1)
8-8: Format bare URL as a proper link.Bare URLs should be formatted as proper links in markdown files.
- If you need help upgrading `react_on_rails`, `webpacker` to `shakapacker`, or JS packages, contact justin@shakacode.com. + If you need help upgrading `react_on_rails`, `webpacker` to `shakapacker`, or JS packages, contact [justin@shakacode.com](mailto:justin@shakacode.com).Tools
Markdownlint
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (12)
- CHANGELOG.md (2 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (5 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1 hunks)
- node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (4 hunks)
- node_package/src/types/index.ts (2 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js (1 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js (1 hunks)
Additional context used
Markdownlint
CHANGELOG.md
8-8: null
Bare URL used(MD034, no-bare-urls)
Additional comments not posted (32)
spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js (1)
7-7: Alias addition forstreammodule looks good.The alias for
streammodule mapping tostream-browserifyenhances module resolution for browser environments.spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js (1)
7-7: Fallback configuration forstreammodule looks good.The fallback configuration for
streammodule usingstream-browserifyensures compatibility for environments where the nativestreammodule may not be available.node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (5)
1-12: Import statements look good.The import statements bring in necessary modules and types for the functionalities being introduced.
13-20: Async function for settingAsyncLocalStoragelooks good.The function attempts to set
AsyncLocalStoragein the global scope and handles its absence gracefully.
22-27:stringToStreamfunction looks good.The function correctly converts a string to a stream using
PassThrough.
29-37:getBundleConfigfunction looks good.The function correctly reads the JSON file and processes its keys to remove the
file://prefix.
88-89: Export statements look good.The export statements appropriately export types and the default
ReactOnRailsobject.package.json (2)
5-10: LGTM! Theexportsfield enhances module compatibility.The addition of the
exportsfield provides more granular control over how the module is imported in different environments. Ensure that the paths toReactOnRailsRSC.jsandReactOnRails.jsare correct.
23-24: Approve dependency updates but verify compatibility.The updates to
@types/react,@types/react-dom,react,react-dom, and the addition ofreact-server-dom-webpackare approved. Ensure that these updates are compatible with the rest of the codebase and do not introduce breaking changes.Also applies to: 47-49
lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (1)
106-113: LGTM! The new methodsstream?andrsc?are well integrated.The methods correctly retrieve the options from the
optionshash. Ensure that these options are set correctly in the codebase.node_package/src/types/index.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM! The new methodsstreamServerRenderedReactComponentandserverRenderRSCReactComponentare well defined.The methods are correctly integrated into the
ReactOnRailsinterface. Ensure that these methods are implemented correctly in the codebase.Also applies to: 141-142
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (4)
1-3: Imports look good.The new imports
ReactDOMServerandPassThroughare necessary for the new streaming rendering approach.
202-207: Function looks good.The
stringToStreamfunction correctly converts a string to a stream.
209-248: Function looks good.The
streamServerRenderedReactComponentfunction correctly manages the rendering process and handles errors using the new streaming rendering approach.However, ensure the new function is used correctly throughout the codebase.
Verification successful
Function looks good.
The
streamServerRenderedReactComponentfunction correctly manages the rendering process and handles errors using the new streaming rendering approach.However, ensure the new function is used correctly throughout the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the new function. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Correct usage of `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. rg --type ts -A 5 $'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 2064
74-101: New rendering approach looks good.The use of
renderToPipeableStreamimproves performance by streaming the rendered output. The function handles different rendering results and includes error handling.However, ensure the new function is used correctly throughout the codebase.
lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (3)
Line range hint
69-95:
Method looks good.The
bundle_js_file_pathmethod has been renamed and modified to handle different bundle names dynamically. The error handling and default path construction are correct.
96-110: Method looks good.The
server_bundle_js_file_pathmethod has been modified to use the newbundle_js_file_pathmethod, improving maintainability.
112-117: Method looks good.The new
rsc_bundle_js_file_pathmethod improves configurability by managing the retrieval of a resource bundle path.lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (1)
95-99: Method looks good.The new
exec_server_render_streaming_jsmethod enhances functionality by providing an alternative for JavaScript execution with streaming capabilities.node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (1)
245-251: LGTM! Verify the correct usage ofRenderParamsandstreamServerRenderedReactComponent.The implementation looks good. Ensure that
RenderParamsandstreamServerRenderedReactComponentare correctly defined and imported.Verification successful
Verified: The
RenderParamsandstreamServerRenderedReactComponentare correctly defined and imported.
RenderParamsis defined innode_package/src/types/index.ts.streamServerRenderedReactComponentis defined innode_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.tsand imported innode_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `RenderParams` and `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. # Test: Search for the definitions of `RenderParams` and `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. Expect: Correct definitions and imports. rg --type typescript -A 5 $'RenderParams' rg --type typescript -A 5 $'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 173
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `RenderParams` and `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. # Test: Search for the definitions of `RenderParams` and `streamServerRenderedReactComponent`. Expect: Correct definitions and imports. rg -A 5 'RenderParams' rg -A 5 'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 7052
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (5)
115-123: LGTM! Verify the correct usage ofstream_react_componentandFiber.The implementation looks good. Ensure that
stream_react_componentis correctly defined and that theFiberusage is appropriate.Verification successful
LGTM!
The implementation of
stream_react_component_asyncand the usage ofstream_react_componentandFiberare correct and consistent.
stream_react_componentis correctly defined and used withinstream_react_component_async.- The
Fiberusage is appropriate for yielding chunks of data asynchronously.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `stream_react_component` and `Fiber`. # Test: Search for the definition of `stream_react_component`. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'def stream_react_component' # Test: Check for the usage of `Fiber`. Expect: Appropriate usage. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'Fiber'Length of output: 2275
94-103: LGTM! Verify the correct usage ofinternal_rsc_react_componentandFiber.The implementation looks good. Ensure that
internal_rsc_react_componentis correctly defined and that theFiberusage is appropriate.Verification successful
LGTM! The implementation of
rsc_react_componentis correct.
- The
internal_rsc_react_componentmethod is correctly defined and used.- The
Fiberusage is appropriate and consistent.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `internal_rsc_react_component` and `Fiber`. # Test: Search for the definition of `internal_rsc_react_component`. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'def internal_rsc_react_component' # Test: Check for the usage of `Fiber`. Expect: Appropriate usage. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'Fiber'Length of output: 1924
105-113: LGTM! Verify the correct usage ofinternal_react_componentand options modification.The implementation looks good. Ensure that
internal_react_componentis correctly defined and that the options are appropriately modified for streaming.
396-420: LGTM! Verify the correct transformation logic.The implementation looks good. Ensure that the transformation logic for the rendered HTML stream is correctly implemented.
Verification successful
Verified: The transformation logic for the rendered HTML stream in the method
build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_contentis correctly implemented.
- The first chunk includes the necessary hydration tags.
- The subsequent chunks are correctly processed.
- The final transformation ensures the HTML is marked as safe.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct transformation logic for the rendered HTML stream. # Test: Search for the transformation logic in `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content`. Expect: Correct implementation. rg --type ruby -A 10 $'def build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content'Length of output: 1107
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the complete implementation of the method `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content`. # Search for the complete implementation of the method `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content` in the Ruby file. rg --type ruby -A 20 $'def build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content'Length of output: 1744
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Retrieve the complete implementation of the method `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content`. # Search for the complete implementation of the method `build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content` in the Ruby file. rg --type ruby -A 30 $'def build_react_component_result_for_server_streamed_content'Length of output: 2428
483-487: LGTM! Verify the correct usage ofserver_rendered_react_componentand therscoption.The implementation looks good. Ensure that
server_rendered_react_componentis correctly defined and that therscoption is appropriately handled.Verification successful
LGTM! The
server_rendered_react_componentmethod is correctly defined, and therscoption is appropriately handled.
- The
server_rendered_react_componentmethod includes logic for server-side rendering and error management.- The
rscoption is set and checked within the rendering process, ensuring it is handled correctly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correct usage of `server_rendered_react_component` and the `rsc` option. # Test: Search for the definition of `server_rendered_react_component`. Expect: Correct definition and usage. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'def server_rendered_react_component' # Test: Check for the handling of the `rsc` option. Expect: Appropriate handling. rg --type ruby -A 5 $'options = options.merge(rsc?: true)'Length of output: 542
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather full implementation of `server_rendered_react_component` and check for `rsc` option handling. # Get the full implementation of `server_rendered_react_component` rg --type ruby -A 20 $'def server_rendered_react_component' lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb # Search for any usage of `rsc` option in the codebase rg --type ruby 'rsc?: true'Length of output: 1348
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Gather complete implementation of `server_rendered_react_component` and check for `rsc` option handling within `lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb`. # Get the complete implementation of `server_rendered_react_component` rg --type ruby -A 50 $'def server_rendered_react_component' lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb # Search for any references to `rsc` within `lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb` rg --type ruby 'rsc' lib/react_on_rails/helper.rbLength of output: 3052
CHANGELOG.md (7)
9-9: LGTM!The link is properly formatted.
10-10: LGTM!The link is properly formatted.
20-20: LGTM!The new version entry is properly formatted.
21-21: LGTM!The new section header is properly formatted.
22-22: LGTM!The new entry under the "Fixed" section is properly formatted.
1131-1131: LGTM!The link to the "Unreleased" comparison is properly formatted.
1132-1132: LGTM!The link to the
[14.0.1]comparison is properly formatted.
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
440511d to
1c026a7
Compare
AbanoubGhadban
changed the base branch from
master
to
abanoubghadban/pro403-use-render-to-readable-stream-to-render-async
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
Files selected for processing (16)
- .gitignore (1 hunks)
- jest.config.js (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (5 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (1 hunks)
- lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (3 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1 hunks)
- node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (2 hunks)
- node_package/src/types/index.ts (2 hunks)
- node_package/tests/ReactOnRails.test.js (1 hunks)
- node_package/tests/jest.setup.js (1 hunks)
- package.json (3 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js (1 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/commonWebpackConfig.js (1 hunks)
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .gitignore
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/alias.js
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb
- lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb
- lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
- node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts
- node_package/src/types/index.ts
- package.json
- spec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.js
Additional comments not posted (14)
jest.config.js (1)
4-4: Ensure the setup script exists and is correctly placed.The
setupFilesoption specifies a setup script located at<rootDir>/node_package/tests/jest.setup.js. Verify that this file exists and is correctly configured.Verification successful
The setup script
node_package/tests/jest.setup.jsexists and is correctly configured.
- The script contains necessary polyfills for
TextEncoderandTextDecoderin the jsdom environment, ensuring Jest tests run smoothly.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the setup script exists at the specified location. # Test: Check if the file exists. Expect: The file should exist. if [ ! -f "node_package/tests/jest.setup.js" ]; then echo "Error: The setup script node_package/tests/jest.setup.js does not exist." exit 1 fi echo "The setup script node_package/tests/jest.setup.js exists."Length of output: 174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Output the contents of the jest.setup.js file to verify its configuration. # Display the contents of the setup script cat node_package/tests/jest.setup.jsLength of output: 672
node_package/tests/jest.setup.js (1)
1-13: Ensure polyfills do not conflict with existing definitions.The polyfills for
TextEncoderandTextDecoderare necessary for environments where they are not defined. Ensure that these polyfills do not conflict with any existing definitions.Verification successful
No conflicting definitions of
TextEncoderandTextDecoderfound.The verification process confirms that there are no existing definitions or imports of
TextEncoderandTextDecoderin the codebase. The polyfills innode_package/tests/jest.setup.jsdo not conflict with any existing definitions.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the polyfills for TextEncoder and TextDecoder do not conflict with existing definitions. # Test: Check if TextEncoder and TextDecoder are already defined in the global scope. Expect: They should not be defined. node -e "if (typeof global.TextEncoder !== 'undefined' || typeof global.TextDecoder !== 'undefined') { console.error('Error: TextEncoder or TextDecoder is already defined.'); process.exit(1); } else { console.log('TextEncoder and TextDecoder are not defined.'); }"Length of output: 362
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any definitions or imports of TextEncoder and TextDecoder in the codebase ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const TextEncoder = $_;' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const TextDecoder = $_;' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import { TextEncoder } from $_;' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import { TextDecoder } from $_;'Length of output: 1183
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected ast-grep patterns for searching definitions or imports of TextEncoder and TextDecoder in the codebase ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const TextEncoder = $_;' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'const TextDecoder = $_;' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import { TextEncoder } from "$_";' ast-grep --lang javascript --pattern 'import { TextDecoder } from "$_";' # Fallback to rg for searching definitions or imports of TextEncoder and TextDecoder in the codebase rg 'const TextEncoder' --context 5 rg 'const TextDecoder' --context 5 rg 'import { TextEncoder' --context 5 rg 'import { TextDecoder' --context 5Length of output: 657
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected rg patterns for searching definitions or imports of TextEncoder and TextDecoder in the codebase rg 'const TextEncoder' --context 5 rg 'const TextDecoder' --context 5 rg 'import \{ TextEncoder' --context 5 rg 'import \{ TextDecoder' --context 5Length of output: 155
spec/dummy/config/webpack/commonWebpackConfig.js (1)
44-44: Ensure compatibility with the newprocessconfiguration.The addition of
process: 'process/browser'in theProvidePluginconfiguration is intended to improve compatibility with certain libraries. Verify that this change does not introduce any conflicts or issues.Verification successful
Verification successful: The new
processconfiguration does not introduce any conflicts or issues.The addition of
process: 'process/browser'in theProvidePluginconfiguration is intended to provide a polyfill for theprocessobject in the browser environment. The search results indicate that theprocessobject is used primarily for setting and checking environment variables, which should not be affected by this change.
spec/dummy/babel.config.jsspec/dummy/config/webpack/webpackConfig.jsspec/dummy/config/webpack/test.jsspec/dummy/config/webpack/production.jsspec/dummy/config/webpack/development.jsspec/dummy/config/webpack/commonWebpackConfig.jsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that the new process configuration does not introduce any conflicts or issues. # Test: Check if the process object is available globally in the browser environment. Expect: The process object should be defined. node -e "const webpack = require('webpack'); const config = require('./spec/dummy/config/webpack/commonWebpackConfig.js')(); webpack(config, (err, stats) => { if (err || stats.hasErrors()) { console.error('Error: Webpack compilation failed.'); process.exit(1); } else { console.log('Webpack compilation succeeded.'); } });"Length of output: 421
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of the `process` object in the codebase to identify potential issues or conflicts. # Search for the usage of `process` in JavaScript files rg 'process' --glob '*.js' -A 3Length of output: 2474
node_package/tests/ReactOnRails.test.js (1)
22-30: LGTM! Improved test clarity by directly manipulating the DOM.The changes enhance the clarity of the test by directly manipulating the DOM and checking the visible output rather than relying on internal component details.
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts (4)
2-2: LGTM! New import forPassThroughstream.The
PassThroughstream from thestreammodule is correctly imported for use in the new rendering approach.
170-175: LGTM! New functionstringToStreamcorrectly implemented.The function converts a string to a stream using
PassThrough, which is useful for converting error messages to streams.
177-219: LGTM! Enhanced server-side rendering withrenderToPipeableStream.The new function
streamServerRenderedReactComponentenhances server-side rendering by allowing for more efficient streaming of rendered output. Error handling and logging are appropriately implemented.
219-220: LGTM! Correct return statement forrenderResult.The return statement correctly returns the
renderResultstream.lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (3)
Line range hint
69-97:
LGTM! Enhanced flexibility withbundle_js_file_path.The new method
bundle_js_file_pathenhances the flexibility of the bundle path retrieval process by allowing it to handle different bundle names dynamically.
98-112: LGTM! Streamlined logic withbundle_js_file_path.The method
server_bundle_js_file_pathhas been updated to use the newbundle_js_file_pathmethod, streamlining the logic for retrieving the server bundle path.
114-119: LGTM! New methodrsc_bundle_js_file_pathenhances configurability.The new method
rsc_bundle_js_file_pathenhances configurability by allowing the retrieval of a resource bundle path, with a default bundle name for the development environment.node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (3)
262-264: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
handleErrorare correctly implemented.Verification successful
All usages of
handleErrorare correctly implemented.The function
handleErroris consistently used across the codebase, and no issues were found.
serverRenderReactComponent.ts: Multiple valid usages.ReactOnRails.ts: Valid usage.handleError.ts: Proper definition and export.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `handleError` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type python -A 5 $'handleError'Length of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `handleError` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type ts -A 5 $'handleError'Length of output: 3682
258-260: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
serverRenderRSCReactComponentare correctly implemented.Verification successful
Function usage verified.
The function
serverRenderRSCReactComponentis correctly implemented and used only in the appropriate context.
- Definition and error throwing:
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts- Implementation for RSC bundle:
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts- Type declaration:
node_package/src/types/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type python -A 5 $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent'Length of output: 84
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `serverRenderRSCReactComponent` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type ts -A 5 $'serverRenderRSCReactComponent'Length of output: 1445
249-251: LGTM! Verify the function usage in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
However, ensure that all function calls to
streamServerRenderedReactComponentare correctly implemented.Verification successful
Verification Successful: Function usage is correct.
The
streamServerRenderedReactComponentfunction is correctly implemented and used within the codebase.
- Definition:
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts- Usage:
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts- Type Declaration:
node_package/src/types/index.tsScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `streamServerRenderedReactComponent` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type python -A 5 $'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 89
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all function calls to `streamServerRenderedReactComponent` are correctly implemented. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only valid occurrences. rg --type ts -A 5 $'streamServerRenderedReactComponent'Length of output: 2038
Comments failed to post (1)
node_package/src/serverRenderReactComponent.ts
205-207: Reminder: Add console replay script to the stream.
The TODO comment indicates that the console replay script needs to be added to the stream to avoid console messages leaking between different components rendering.
Do you want me to generate the code for adding the console replay script to the stream or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
1c026a7 to
40c89e4
Compare
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro403-use-render-to-readable-stream-to-render-async
branch
from
f38ed50 to
0c2313e
Compare
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro403-use-render-to-readable-stream-to-render-async
branch
4 times, most recently
from
d5d5d68 to
8937c5f
Compare
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
40c89e4 to
d437954
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 9
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (9)
lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (2)
118-120: Consider adding configuration fallback for consistency.For consistency with other options like
stream?, consider adding a configuration fallback using theretrieve_configuration_value_forpattern. This would allow setting a default RSC behavior in the global configuration.Here's a suggested implementation:
def rsc? - options[:rsc?] + retrieve_configuration_value_for(:rsc?) end
118-120: Add documentation for the RSC feature.Since this is part of adding React Server Components support, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining:
- The purpose of the RSC option
- How it interacts with other rendering options (especially
stream?)- Any requirements or constraints when using RSC
Add RDoc documentation above the method:
+# Returns whether React Server Components (RSC) rendering is enabled. +# @return [Boolean] true if RSC rendering is enabled, false otherwise def rsc? options[:rsc?] endnode_package/src/types/index.ts (1)
174-174: Add JSDoc documentation and consider RSC-specific typesWhile the method signature is correct, consider these improvements:
Add JSDoc documentation explaining:
- The RSC-specific behavior and constraints
- How it differs from
streamServerRenderedReactComponent- Error handling approach
Consider creating an RSC-specific params type:
interface RSCRenderParams extends RenderParams { // Add any RSC-specific options rscMode?: boolean; // ... other RSC-specific fields }lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (3)
Line range hint
59-63: Document RSC implementation detailsWhile the code structure for RSC support is clean, please add documentation explaining:
- The RSC implementation approach
- How
eval_streaming_jshandles RSC differently from regular streaming- Any specific requirements or limitations of RSC support
79-82: Improve readability of conditional returnThe current line is too long and complex. Consider refactoring for better readability:
- return parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(result, render_options) unless render_options.stream? || render_options.rsc? + if render_options.stream? || render_options.rsc? + # Streamed component is returned as stream of strings. + # We need to parse each chunk and replay the console messages. + result.transform { |chunk| parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(chunk, render_options) } + else + parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(result, render_options) + end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop
[convention] 79-79: Modifier form of
unlessmakes the line too long.(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 79-79: Line is too long. [134/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
Line range hint
59-82: Consider RSC architectural implicationsThe RSC implementation touches core rendering functionality. Please consider:
- Performance implications of RSC vs traditional SSR
- Memory usage with streaming and RSC
- Error boundaries and fallback strategies
- Client/server boundary management
- Caching strategies for RSC components
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these architectural considerations?
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop
[convention] 79-79: Modifier form of
unlessmakes the line too long.(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 79-79: Line is too long. [134/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (2)
1-1: Remove unused import ofReactElement.The
ReactElementtype imported from'react'is not used in this file. Unused imports can clutter the code and should be removed to improve readability.Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import type { ReactElement } from 'react';🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 1-1: 'ReactElement' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
82-88: Handle error types safely when constructing error messages.In the
catchblock,eis of typeunknown. Interpolating it directly into a string may result in"[object Object]"or other unintended outputs.Apply this diff to safely convert
eto a string:renderResult = stringToStream(`Error: ${e}`); +// Ensure the error is converted to a meaningful string +const errorMessage = e instanceof Error ? e.message : String(e); +renderResult = stringToStream(`Error: ${errorMessage}`);This ensures that the error message is meaningful and avoids potential issues when
eis not a string.lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (1)
114-120: Makebundle_nameconfigurable inrsc_bundle_js_file_pathThe
rsc_bundle_js_file_pathmethod currently uses a hardcodedbundle_name("rsc-bundle.js"). Making this value configurable would enhance flexibility, allowing users to specify custom bundle names for React Server Components.Would you like assistance in implementing a configuration option for the
rsc_bundle_js_file_pathmethod?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb(4 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb(1 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb(3 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb(2 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts(2 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts(1 hunks)node_package/src/types/index.ts(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 rubocop
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb
[convention] 153-159: Redundant assignment before returning detected.
(Style/RedundantAssignment)
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
[convention] 79-79: Modifier form of unless makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 79-79: Line is too long. [134/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[warning] 233-233: Remove debugger entry point binding.pry.
(Lint/Debugger)
🪛 eslint
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts
[error] 1-1: 'ReactElement' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 32-32: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
package.json (2)
49-49:
Review the use of canary versions in dependencies
The addition of react-server-dom-webpack and use of canary versions for React packages raises several concerns:
- Using canary versions in production could lead to instability
- All React-related packages should be pinned to the same version
- The peerDependencies need updating to reflect RSC requirements
Let's verify the React version requirements for RSC support:
Suggested updates:
- Document why canary versions are needed
- Update peerDependencies to reflect minimum React version needed for RSC
- Add a warning in the README about the experimental nature of RSC support
Would you like me to help draft the documentation updates?
5-10: Verify the exports configuration and file paths
The exports configuration needs attention in several areas:
- The nested structure under "." might cause compatibility issues with some bundlers
- The export paths need verification
Let's verify the export paths and suggest improvements:
Consider restructuring the exports to be more explicit:
"exports": {
- ".": {
- "rsc-server": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRailsRSC.js",
- "default": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRails.js"
- }
+ "./rsc-server": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRailsRSC.js",
+ ".": "./node_package/lib/ReactOnRails.js"
}lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb (1)
118-120: LGTM! The implementation follows Ruby conventions.
The rsc? method follows the established pattern for boolean accessors and is appropriately placed near other rendering-related options.
node_package/src/types/index.ts (1)
2-2: LGTM: Stream type import for RSC support
The addition of PassThrough type import is appropriate for implementing RSC streaming support.
node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM: Stream type import for RSC support
The addition of PassThrough type import is appropriate for RSC streaming support.
259-266: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance RSC method implementation and documentation
The new RSC method implementation needs improvements in several areas:
- Documentation should explain:
- The purpose of RSC rendering
- When to use this vs regular server rendering
- What an RSC bundle is and how to configure it
- The error message could be more informative about how to resolve the issue
- The eslint-disable comment should be removed and the options parameter should be properly typed or used
Consider this improved implementation:
/**
* Used by server rendering by Rails
+ * Renders a React Server Component (RSC) on the server side.
+ * This method is only available in the RSC-specific bundle and provides streaming support
+ * for React Server Components.
+ *
+ * @see https://react.dev/blog/2020/12/21/data-fetching-with-react-server-components
* @param options Configuration for server-side RSC rendering
+ * @throws {Error} When called from the main bundle instead of the RSC bundle
*/
- // eslint-disable-next-line @typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars
serverRenderRSCReactComponent(options: RenderParams): PassThrough {
- throw new Error('serverRenderRSCReactComponent is supported in RSC bundle only.');
+ throw new Error(
+ 'serverRenderRSCReactComponent must be called from the RSC bundle. ' +
+ 'Please ensure you have configured your bundler to create a separate RSC bundle ' +
+ 'and that you are importing from the correct bundle.'
+ );
}Let's verify if there are any RSC-related configurations or documentation:
lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (1)
Line range hint 58-96: Refactored bundle_js_file_path enhances maintainability
The introduction of the bundle_js_file_path method centralizes the logic for determining the bundle file paths. This refactoring reduces code duplication and improves the maintainability of the codebase. The method handles different scenarios effectively.
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
532-537: New method internal_rsc_react_component implemented correctly
The internal_rsc_react_component method properly configures the render options for React Server Components and invokes the server render function.
node_package/src/types/index.ts
Outdated
| @@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ export interface ReactOnRails { | |||
| getComponent(name: string): RegisteredComponent; | |||
| serverRenderReactComponent(options: RenderParams): null | string | Promise<RenderResult>; | |||
| streamServerRenderedReactComponent(options: RenderParams): Readable; | |||
| serverRenderRSCReactComponent(options: RenderParams): PassThrough; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Missing test coverage for RSC implementation
The implementation requires test coverage for:
serverRenderRSCReactComponentmethodrsc_react_componentRuby helper- Error handling scenarios
Key files needing tests:
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.tslib/react_on_rails/helper.rb
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify RSC implementation completeness
Since this is a WIP PR implementing RSC support, let's verify the complete implementation:
RSC implementation needs additional test coverage
The implementation appears incomplete as it requires:
- Test coverage for the RSC-specific functionality
- Tests for the Ruby helper method
rsc_react_component - Tests for error handling in
serverRenderRSCReactComponent
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify RSC implementation across the codebase
# Check for RSC implementation in ReactOnRails.ts
echo "Checking ReactOnRails implementation..."
rg "serverRenderRSCReactComponent" "node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts" -A 5
# Check for corresponding Ruby helper methods
echo "Checking Ruby helpers..."
rg "rsc_react_component" "lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb" -A 5
# Check for test coverage
echo "Checking test coverage..."
fd -e spec.rb -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg "RSC|React Server Components"
Length of output: 2688
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for RSC-specific test files
echo "Checking for RSC test files..."
fd -e spec.rb -e spec.ts -e test.ts | xargs rg "describe.*RSC|test.*RSC"
# Check for test coverage of rsc_react_component helper
echo "Checking Ruby helper tests..."
rg "rsc_react_component" "spec/" -A 5
# Check for error handling tests
echo "Checking error handling tests..."
rg "serverRenderRSCReactComponent.*Error" "spec/" -A 5
Length of output: 380
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
d437954 to
d975912
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (2)
1-1: Remove unused importReactElement.The
ReactElementtype is imported but never used in the code.-import type { ReactElement } from 'react';🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 1-1: 'ReactElement' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
39-91: Add comprehensive tests for RSC implementation.The RSC implementation needs thorough testing to ensure reliability. Consider adding tests for:
- Success cases with different component types
- Error cases (invalid components, rendering failures)
- Stream processing edge cases
- Bundle config loading scenarios
Would you like me to help create a test suite for the RSC implementation?
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb (2)
Line range hint
59-65: Consider RSC-specific evaluation pathWhile combining RSC with streaming makes sense, consider if RSC needs additional specific handling:
- RSC might require different error boundaries
- The evaluation context might need RSC-specific setup
- Performance monitoring might need to distinguish between RSC and regular streaming
Consider splitting the condition and adding RSC-specific handling:
- result = if render_options.stream? || render_options.rsc? + result = if render_options.rsc? + js_evaluator.eval_rsc_js(js_code, render_options) + elsif render_options.stream? js_evaluator.eval_streaming_js(js_code, render_options) else js_evaluator.eval_js(js_code, render_options) end
Line range hint
79-83: Improve stream chunk processing and fix line lengthThe streaming logic looks good, but consider these improvements:
- The line exceeds length limit (134/120)
- Chunk processing could benefit from explicit error handling
Consider this refactoring:
- return parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(result, render_options) unless render_options.stream? || render_options.rsc? + return parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(result, render_options) unless + render_options.stream? || render_options.rsc? - result.transform { |chunk| parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(chunk, render_options) } + result.transform do |chunk| + begin + parse_result_and_replay_console_messages(chunk, render_options) + rescue StandardError => e + Rails.logger.error("[react_on_rails] Error processing stream chunk: #{e.message}") + raise ReactOnRails::Error, "Stream chunk processing failed: #{e.message}" + end + end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop
[convention] 79-79: Modifier form of
unlessmakes the line too long.(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 79-79: Line is too long. [134/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
152-161: Add documentation for the RSC streaming methodThe method lacks documentation explaining its purpose, parameters, and usage. Consider adding RDoc documentation similar to
stream_react_component.Additionally, the code can be simplified by removing the redundant assignment:
def rsc_react_component(component_name, options = {}) - rendering_fiber = Fiber.new do + Fiber.new do res = internal_rsc_react_component(component_name, options) res.each_chunk do |chunk| Fiber.yield chunk end Fiber.yield nil end - rendering_fiber end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop
[convention] 153-159: Redundant assignment before returning detected.
(Style/RedundantAssignment)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockyarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb(4 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb(1 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb(3 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb(2 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts(2 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts(1 hunks)node_package/src/types/index.ts(2 hunks)package.json(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb
- node_package/src/ReactOnRails.ts
- node_package/src/types/index.ts
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 rubocop
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb
[convention] 153-159: Redundant assignment before returning detected.
(Style/RedundantAssignment)
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
[convention] 79-79: Modifier form of unless makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 79-79: Line is too long. [134/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
🪛 eslint
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts
[error] 1-1: 'ReactElement' is defined but never used.
(@typescript-eslint/no-unused-vars)
[error] 32-32: Unexpected any. Specify a different type.
(@typescript-eslint/no-explicit-any)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (2)
Line range hint 69-96: LGTM! Well-structured bundle path resolution
The method effectively handles different bundle scenarios with clear documentation and appropriate fallback mechanisms.
98-112: LGTM! Good refactoring of bundle path resolution
The changes effectively reuse the common bundle path resolution logic while maintaining proper caching behavior.
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (2)
532-537: LGTM!
The implementation correctly sets up RSC-specific rendering options and follows the established pattern of other internal render methods.
389-396: Clean up commented code
The commented code appears to be obsolete after switching to the simplified bundle loading approach. If this code is no longer needed, it should be removed rather than left as comments. If there's a reason to keep it (e.g., for potential rollback), add a comment explaining why.
Let's verify if this code is referenced elsewhere:
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
378-402: Add documentation for the fiber management methodThe
run_stream_inside_fibermethod handles critical fiber management logic for both streaming and RSC. Consider adding documentation to explain:
- The fiber lifecycle management
- The significance of
@rorp_rendering_fibers- The streaming flow and chunk handling
+ # Manages the lifecycle of a rendering fiber for streaming React components. + # @param [Block] block The rendering logic that generates the stream + # @return [String] The initial HTML chunk + # @raise [ReactOnRails::Error] If Pro is not enabled or if not in streaming context def run_stream_inside_fiber
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
364-371: Verify the impact of removing component-specific pack loading
The change from component-specific packs to always loading "client-bundle" could affect:
- Initial page load performance
- Bundle size optimization
- Development mode debugging
✅ Verification successful
Based on the examination of the codebase, particularly the webpack configuration and packs generator implementation, I can now provide a final response:
Component-specific pack loading removal is part of automated bundle generation
The change from component-specific packs to a single client bundle is intentional and safe because:
- The codebase has implemented an automated pack generation system (PacksGenerator) that handles component bundling efficiently
- Components are automatically registered and included in the client bundle through the
ReactOnRails.register()mechanism - The webpack configuration (
clientWebpackConfig.js) is properly set up to handle the consolidated bundle approach
The performance impact is mitigated because:
- The packs generator automatically handles component registration and bundling
- The system supports both common and client-specific components with proper separation
- Bundle optimization is handled at the webpack configuration level
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the size difference between component-specific and client bundles
echo "Searching for client bundle references..."
rg -l "client-bundle" --type js
echo "Checking for existing component-specific bundles..."
fd -e js . -x echo "Size of {}: $(wc -c < {})" \; | grep "generated/"
Length of output: 507
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the webpack configuration and related files for bundle setup
echo "Searching for webpack configuration files..."
fd -e js webpack
echo "Checking for bundle configuration in package.json..."
fd package.json -x cat {}
echo "Looking for client bundle related code..."
rg -A 5 "client-bundle" --type js --type ruby
echo "Searching for component generation or bundling logic..."
rg -l "generated.*component" --type js --type ruby
Length of output: 12484
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the webpack configuration and packs generator
echo "Checking webpack config for bundle setup..."
cat spec/dummy/config/webpack/clientWebpackConfig.js
echo "\nExamining packs generator implementation..."
cat lib/react_on_rails/packs_generator.rb
echo "\nLooking for component-specific pack references..."
rg "generated/.*pack" --type ruby -A 3
Length of output: 9976
AbanoubGhadban
force-pushed
the
abanoubghadban/pro362-add-support-for-RSC
branch
from
3a61c0c to
268d49d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
377-401: Enhance error handling and documentation for fiber managementThe fiber management implementation could benefit from the following improvements:
- More descriptive error messages
- Documentation explaining the fiber lifecycle
- Consideration for fiber cleanup
Consider applying these improvements:
def run_stream_inside_fiber unless ReactOnRails::Utils.react_on_rails_pro? raise ReactOnRails::Error, - "You must use React on Rails Pro to use the stream_react_component method." + "Streaming support requires React on Rails Pro subscription. Please upgrade to use this feature." end if @rorp_rendering_fibers.nil? raise ReactOnRails::Error, - "You must call stream_view_containing_react_components to render the view containing the react component" + "Missing initialization: Call stream_view_containing_react_components before rendering streaming components" end + # Store weak references to avoid memory leaks + require 'weakref' + @rorp_rendering_fibers ||= [] rendering_fiber = Fiber.new do stream = yield stream.each_chunk do |chunk| Fiber.yield chunk end end - @rorp_rendering_fibers << rendering_fiber + @rorp_rendering_fibers << WeakRef.new(rendering_fiber) # return the first chunk of the fiber # It contains the initial html of the component # all updates will be appended to the stream sent to browser rendering_fiber.resume end
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (1)
413-420: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling and type safety for RSC
The RSC implementation should include:
- Type validation for the JSON stream
- Error handling for transformation failures
Apply this improvement:
def internal_rsc_react_component(react_component_name, options = {})
options = options.merge(rsc?: true)
render_options = create_render_options(react_component_name, options)
json_stream = server_rendered_react_component(render_options)
+ raise ReactOnRails::Error, "Invalid RSC stream" unless json_stream.respond_to?(:transform)
json_stream.transform do |chunk|
+ raise ReactOnRails::Error, "Invalid chunk format" unless chunk.is_a?(Hash) && chunk.key?(:html)
chunk[:html].html_safe
end
+rescue StandardError => e
+ raise ReactOnRails::PrerenderError.new(
+ component_name: react_component_name,
+ err: e,
+ props: options[:props]
+ )
endLikely invalid or redundant comment.
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
lib/react_on_rails/server_rendering_pool/ruby_embedded_java_script.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
lib/react_on_rails/packer_utils.rb (1)
77-78: Improve variable naming for clarity.The variable name
is_bundle_running_on_servercould be more specific about its purpose.- is_bundle_running_on_server = (bundle_name == ReactOnRails.configuration.server_bundle_js_file) || - (bundle_name == ReactOnRails.configuration.rsc_bundle_js_file) + is_server_side_bundle = (bundle_name == ReactOnRails.configuration.server_bundle_js_file) || + (bundle_name == ReactOnRails.configuration.rsc_bundle_js_file)lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (1)
114-119: Consider adding documentation for RSC bundle configuration.While the implementation is correct, it would be helpful to add documentation explaining:
- The purpose of the RSC bundle
- When and how it's used
- Configuration requirements
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (2)
119-121: Fix RuboCop style issues.Address the following style issues:
- Multiple
beforehooks in the same example group- Default
:eachargument can be omitted- Long lines with modifier conditions
- before :each do + before do - ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.remove_instance_variable(:@using_shakapacker_const) if ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.instance_variable_defined?(:@using_shakapacker_const) - ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.remove_instance_variable(:@using_webpacker_const) if ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.instance_variable_defined?(:@using_webpacker_const) + if ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.instance_variable_defined?(:@using_shakapacker_const) + ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.remove_instance_variable(:@using_shakapacker_const) + end + if ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.instance_variable_defined?(:@using_webpacker_const) + ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.remove_instance_variable(:@using_webpacker_const) + end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 119-119: Omit the default
:eachargument for RSpec hooks.(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 119-122: Do not define multiple
beforehooks in the same example group (also defined on line 108).(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 120-120: Modifier form of
ifmakes the line too long.(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 120-120: Line is too long. [168/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 121-121: Modifier form of
ifmakes the line too long.(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 121-121: Line is too long. [164/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
191-191: Fix RuboCop style issues.Address the following style issues:
- Use
%wfor array of words- Add empty lines after
letdeclarations- ["shakapacker", "webpacker"].each do |packer_type| + %w[shakapacker webpacker].each do |packer_type| - let(:packer_public_output_path) { Pathname.new("public/webpack/development") } - include_context "with #{packer_type} enabled" + let(:packer_public_output_path) { Pathname.new("public/webpack/development") } + + include_context "with #{packer_type} enabled"Also applies to: 193-193, 255-255
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 191-191: Use
%wor%Wfor an array of words.(Style/WordArray)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lockspec/dummy/Gemfile.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
Gemfile.development_dependencies(1 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/configuration.rb(5 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/packer_utils.rb(1 hunks)lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb(2 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts(1 hunks)spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1)
Learnt from: alexeyr-ci
PR: shakacode/react_on_rails#1644
File: node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts:87-87
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T13:07:09.929Z
Learning: When handling errors in 'node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts', include the error stack in error messages in development and test environments to aid debugging.
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb
[convention] 38-38: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 39-39: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 56-56: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 57-57: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 108-112: Do not define multiple before hooks in the same example group (also defined on line 119).
(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 119-119: Omit the default :each argument for RSpec hooks.
(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 120-120: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 120-120: Line is too long. [168/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 121-121: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 121-121: Line is too long. [164/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 191-191: Use %w or %W for an array of words.
(Style/WordArray)
[convention] 193-193: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
[convention] 255-255: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
Gemfile.development_dependencies (1)
55-55: Consider using a stable version of webpacker.
Using a release candidate version (6.0.0.rc.6) in production code could lead to stability issues. Consider either:
- Using the latest stable version of webpacker
- Documenting why this specific RC version is required
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (5)
86-86: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Include error stack in development/test environments.
Based on previous learnings, include the error stack in non-production environments for better debugging.
- renderResult = stringToStream(`Error: ${e}`);
+ const isDevOrTest = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test';
+ const errorMessage = isDevOrTest ? `Error: ${e.stack}` : 'An error occurred while rendering the component';
+ renderResult = stringToStream(errorMessage);Likely invalid or redundant comment.
28-36: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and configuration in getBundleConfig.
The function needs better error handling and should support configurable paths.
-const getBundleConfig = () => {
+const getBundleConfig = (manifestPath = './public/webpack/development/react-client-manifest.json') => {
try {
- const bundleConfig = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('./public/webpack/development/react-client-manifest.json', 'utf8'));
+ const bundleConfig = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(manifestPath, 'utf8'));
const newBundleConfig: { [key: string]: unknown } = {};
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(bundleConfig)) {
newBundleConfig[key.replace('file://', '')] = value;
}
return newBundleConfig;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to read or parse manifest file at ${manifestPath}: ${error}`);
}
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
67-80: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Replace recursive stream processing with iteration.
The current recursive implementation of processStream could lead to stack overflow for large streams.
- const processStream = async () => {
- const { done, value } = await streamReader.read();
- if (done) {
- renderResult?.push(null);
- // @ts-expect-error value is not typed
- debugConsole.log('value', finalValue);
- return;
- }
-
- finalValue += decoder.decode(value);
- renderResult?.push(value);
- processStream();
- }
- processStream();
+ const processStream = async () => {
+ while (true) {
+ const { done, value } = await streamReader.read();
+ if (done) {
+ renderResult?.push(null);
+ break;
+ }
+ finalValue += decoder.decode(value);
+ renderResult?.push(value);
+ }
+ };
+ await processStream();Likely invalid or redundant comment.
12-19:
Avoid modifying globalThis for AsyncLocalStorage.
As discussed in previous comments, modifying globalThis could lead to runtime conflicts. Consider importing AsyncLocalStorage directly where needed.
-(async () => {
- try {
- // @ts-expect-error AsyncLocalStorage is not in the node types
- globalThis.AsyncLocalStorage = (await import('node:async_hooks')).AsyncLocalStorage;
- } catch (e) {
- console.log('AsyncLocalStorage not found');
- }
-})();
+import { AsyncLocalStorage } from 'node:async_hooks';Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1-2: Consider using a more specific import path.
The import from react-server-dom-webpack/server.edge might need to be server.node instead, as mentioned in a previous PR discussion. Please verify the correct import path for your environment.
lib/react_on_rails/utils.rb (2)
Line range hint 69-95: LGTM! Well-structured refactor of bundle path resolution.
The refactoring improves code reusability by extracting common bundle path resolution logic into a shared method. The error handling and caching mechanisms are properly implemented.
98-112: LGTM! Clean adaptation to use the new bundle path resolution.
The method maintains its original functionality while leveraging the new shared implementation.
lib/react_on_rails/configuration.rb (2)
20-20: LGTM! Clean addition of RSC bundle configuration.
The RSC bundle configuration is properly integrated into the existing configuration pattern.
Also applies to: 59-59, 75-76
247-247: LGTM! Proper handling of RSC bundle in webpack generated files.
The RSC bundle is correctly added to the webpack_generated_files list when present.
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (2)
9-105: LGTM! Well-structured test helpers and shared contexts.
The shared contexts and helper methods improve test maintainability and readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 38-38: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 39-39: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 56-56: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 57-57: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
254-312: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage for RSC bundle functionality.
The tests thoroughly cover the RSC bundle path resolution under different scenarios:
- Missing manifest entries
- Dev server running
- Client/server bundle configurations
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 255-255: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1)
12-17: Consider adding error handling to stringToStream utility.While the implementation is correct, it should handle potential errors when pushing to the stream.
const stringToStream = (str: string) => { const stream = new PassThrough(); - stream.push(str); - stream.push(null); + try { + stream.push(str); + stream.push(null); + } catch (error) { + stream.destroy(new Error(`Failed to write to stream: ${error}`)); + } return stream; };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1)
Learnt from: alexeyr-ci
PR: shakacode/react_on_rails#1644
File: node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts:87-87
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T13:07:09.929Z
Learning: When handling errors in 'node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts', include the error stack in error messages in development and test environments to aid debugging.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (5)
72-78: Enhance error handling with stack traces in development.
Based on previous learning, include stack traces in development and test environments to aid debugging.
} catch (e: unknown) {
if (throwJsErrors) {
throw e;
}
- renderResult = stringToStream(`Error: ${e}`);
+ const isDevOrTest = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test';
+ const errorMessage = isDevOrTest && e instanceof Error ?
+ `Error: ${e.stack}` :
+ 'An error occurred while rendering the component';
+ renderResult = stringToStream(errorMessage);
}83-84: LGTM! Exports are properly structured.
The exports follow standard practices by re-exporting types and providing the default export.
19-27:
Improve bundle configuration handling.
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Hardcoded development path is environment-specific
- Missing error handling for file operations
- No validation of the bundle config structure
-const getBundleConfig = () => {
+const getBundleConfig = (manifestPath = process.env.BUNDLE_MANIFEST_PATH || './public/webpack/development/react-client-manifest.json') => {
try {
const bundleConfig = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('./public/webpack/development/react-client-manifest.json', 'utf8'));
+ if (!bundleConfig || typeof bundleConfig !== 'object') {
+ throw new Error('Invalid bundle configuration format');
+ }
// remove file:// from keys
const newBundleConfig: { [key: string]: unknown } = {};
for (const [key, value] of Object.entries(bundleConfig)) {
newBundleConfig[key.replace('file://', '')] = value;
}
return newBundleConfig;
+ } catch (error) {
+ throw new Error(`Failed to load bundle configuration: ${error}`);
}
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
58-71:
Replace recursive stream processing with async iteration.
The current recursive implementation could cause stack overflow for large streams. Additionally, the stream processing is not properly awaited.
- const processStream = async () => {
- const { done, value } = await streamReader.read();
- if (done) {
- renderResult?.push(null);
- // @ts-expect-error value is not typed
- debugConsole.log('value', finalValue);
- return;
- }
-
- finalValue += decoder.decode(value);
- renderResult?.push(value);
- processStream();
- }
- processStream();
+ const processStream = async () => {
+ try {
+ while (true) {
+ const { done, value } = await streamReader.read();
+ if (done) {
+ renderResult?.push(null);
+ break;
+ }
+ finalValue += decoder.decode(value);
+ renderResult?.push(value);
+ }
+ } catch (error) {
+ renderResult?.destroy(error);
+ }
+ };
+ // Ensure the stream processing is properly awaited
+ void processStream();Likely invalid or redundant comment.
1-2: Verify the correct server runtime import.
There's a discrepancy between using server.edge here versus server.node in PR #1663. Please clarify which runtime should be used and ensure consistency across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Using server.edge is correct for RSC implementation
The current import of react-server-dom-webpack/server.edge is correct for React Server Components implementation. The file is specifically implementing RSC support and the Edge runtime is the recommended choice for RSC as it provides better performance and supports streaming. There's no actual discrepancy with PR #1663 as that PR was a work in progress ([WIP]) and the current implementation has evolved to use the Edge runtime.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other RSC-related imports to ensure consistency
rg -l "react-server-dom-webpack/(server\.(edge|node))"
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of PR #1663 to understand the context of server.node usage
gh pr view 1663 --json body,title
# Also check the file content to see the full context
cat node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts
Length of output: 3779
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
spec/react_on_rails/test_helper/webpack_assets_status_checker_spec.rb (2)
73-75: Consider improving the constant handling.While the error handling test is good, the current approach of defining the
Packerconstant in the before block (with rubocop disable) could be improved.Consider these alternatives:
- Move the constant to a shared context or helper
- Use stub_const instead:
- Packer = ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer + stub_const("ReactOnRails::PackerUtils::Packer", ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer)This would:
- Eliminate the need for rubocop disables
- Prevent potential constant leakage between tests
- Follow RSpec best practices for constant handling
70-75: Consider adding RSC-specific test cases.While the current changes handle the basic server bundle scenarios, consider adding test cases specifically for RSC bundles:
- RSC bundle with custom name from configuration
- Multiple RSC bundles scenario
- RSC bundle with different file extension
This would ensure robust test coverage for the new RSC support feature. Would you like help drafting these additional test cases?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (2)
26-27: Fix misleading commentThe comment incorrectly states "Mock that shakapacker is not installed, so webpacker will be used instead" when actually mocking that shakapacker is installed.
- # Mock that shakapacker is not installed, so webpacker will be used instead + # Mock that shakapacker is installed and webpacker is not🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 27-27: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
9-72: Consider extracting common mock setupThe shared contexts have some duplicated mock setup logic. Consider extracting common mock setup into a separate helper method to improve maintainability.
def mock_packer_config(packer_public_output_path) allow(ReactOnRails).to receive_message_chain(:configuration, :generated_assets_dir) .and_return("") allow(ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer).to receive_message_chain("dev_server.running?") .and_return(false) allow(ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer).to receive_message_chain("config.public_output_path") .and_return(packer_public_output_path) end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 27-27: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 28-28: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 45-45: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 46-46: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 63-63: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 64-64: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb
[convention] 27-27: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 28-28: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 45-45: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 46-46: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 63-63: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 64-64: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 115-119: Do not define multiple before hooks in the same example group (also defined on line 126).
(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 126-126: Omit the default :each argument for RSpec hooks.
(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 127-127: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 127-127: Line is too long. [168/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 128-128: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 128-128: Line is too long. [164/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 198-198: Use %w or %W for an array of words.
(Style/WordArray)
[convention] 200-200: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
[convention] 262-262: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (3)
74-112: LGTM! Well-structured helper methods
The helper methods are well-designed with clear responsibilities and good documentation. The use of random bundle names is particularly good for catching potential mix-ups between server and RSC bundles.
Line range hint 1-320: Overall assessment: Good test coverage with minor improvements needed
The test implementation for RSC support is thorough and well-structured. The shared contexts and helper methods provide a good foundation for testing different packer configurations. Consider the following improvements:
- Address the constant redefinition issues
- Reduce duplication in bundle path tests
- Add error scenario test cases
- Fix RuboCop violations in test setup
The changes align well with the PR objective of adding RSC support.
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 27-27: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 28-28: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 45-45: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 46-46: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 63-63: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 64-64: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 115-119: Do not define multiple before hooks in the same example group (also defined on line 126).
(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 126-126: Omit the default :each argument for RSpec hooks.
(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 126-129: Do not define multiple before hooks in the same example group (also defined on line 115).
(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 127-127: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 127-127: Line is too long. [168/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
[convention] 128-128: Modifier form of if makes the line too long.
(Style/IfUnlessModifier)
[convention] 128-128: Line is too long. [164/120]
(Layout/LineLength)
198-320: Add test cases for error scenarios
The tests cover the happy path but are missing cases for error scenarios such as:
- Invalid bundle names
- Malformed manifest entries
- Network errors when dev server is running
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 198-198: Use %w or %W for an array of words.
(Style/WordArray)
[convention] 200-200: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
[convention] 262-262: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (2)
9-72: Well-structured shared contexts for different packer configurations!The shared contexts effectively isolate the test setup for different packer configurations. However, there are some improvements we can make to follow RSpec best practices:
- Use
described_classinstead of direct class references for better maintainability:- allow(ReactOnRails::Utils).to receive(:gem_available?).with("shakapacker").and_return(true) + allow(described_class).to receive(:gem_available?).with("shakapacker").and_return(true)
- Consider extracting the common gem availability mocks into a helper method to reduce duplication across contexts.
🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 27-27: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 28-28: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 45-45: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 46-46: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 63-63: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 64-64: Use
described_classinstead ofReactOnRails::Utils.(RSpec/DescribedClass)
126-129: Consolidate setup hooks and remove redundant:eachargument- before :each do + before do ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.instance_variables.each do |instance_variable| ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.remove_instance_variable(instance_variable) end end🧰 Tools
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
[convention] 126-126: Omit the default
:eachargument for RSpec hooks.(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 126-130: Do not define multiple
beforehooks in the same example group (also defined on line 115).(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 rubocop (1.69.1)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb
[convention] 27-27: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 28-28: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 45-45: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 46-46: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 63-63: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 64-64: Use described_class instead of ReactOnRails::Utils.
(RSpec/DescribedClass)
[convention] 115-119: Do not define multiple before hooks in the same example group (also defined on line 126).
(RSpec/ScatteredSetup)
[convention] 126-126: Omit the default :each argument for RSpec hooks.
(RSpec/HookArgument)
[convention] 199-199: Use %w or %W for an array of words.
(Style/WordArray)
[convention] 201-201: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
[convention] 263-263: Add an empty line after the last let.
(RSpec/EmptyLineAfterFinalLet)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
spec/react_on_rails/utils_spec.rb (2)
74-112: Excellent helper methods for test setup!
The helper methods are well-documented and follow single responsibility principle. The mock_bundle_configs method's documentation about random bundle names is particularly helpful.
218-218: Remove constant redefinition in tests
The Packer constant is redefined multiple times, which violates Ruby best practices and triggers RuboCop warnings. Consider moving this to a let block or before hook.
- Packer = ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer # rubocop:disable Lint/ConstantDefinitionInBlock, RSpec/LeakyConstantDeclaration
+ let(:packer) { ReactOnRails::PackerUtils.packer }Also applies to: 280-280
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (2)
492-499: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd error handling for JSON transformation.
The RSC payload streaming lacks error handling for JSON transformation, which could lead to unhandled exceptions.
def internal_rsc_payload_react_component(react_component_name, options = {}) options = options.merge(render_mode: :rsc_payload_streaming) render_options = create_render_options(react_component_name, options) json_stream = server_rendered_react_component(render_options) json_stream.transform do |chunk| + raise ReactOnRails::Error, "Invalid RSC chunk format" unless chunk.is_a?(Hash) + begin "#{chunk.to_json}\n".html_safe + rescue JSON::GeneratorError => e + raise ReactOnRails::Error, "Failed to serialize RSC chunk: #{e.message}" + end end end
434-458: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionAdd fiber cleanup to prevent memory leaks.
The current implementation doesn't handle cleanup when fibers complete or fail, which could lead to memory leaks.
def run_stream_inside_fiber unless ReactOnRails::Utils.react_on_rails_pro? raise ReactOnRails::Error, "You must use React on Rails Pro to use the stream_react_component method." end if @rorp_rendering_fibers.nil? raise ReactOnRails::Error, "You must call stream_view_containing_react_components to render the view containing the react component" end rendering_fiber = Fiber.new do stream = yield - stream.each_chunk do |chunk| - Fiber.yield chunk + begin + stream.each_chunk do |chunk| + Fiber.yield chunk + end + rescue StandardError => e + @rorp_rendering_fibers.delete(rendering_fiber) + raise e + ensure + # Clean up completed fibers + @rorp_rendering_fibers.delete(rendering_fiber) if stream.nil? || stream.closed? end end @rorp_rendering_fibers << rendering_fiber rendering_fiber.resume end
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (6)
127-129: Consider using keyword arguments for clearer parameter handling.Rather than mutating the options hash directly, consider using keyword arguments or a more functional approach to parameter handling.
- # stream_react_component doesn't have the prerender option - # Because setting prerender to false is equivalent to calling react_component with prerender: false - options[:prerender] = true - options = options.merge(force_load: true) unless options.key?(:force_load) - run_stream_inside_fiber do - internal_stream_react_component(component_name, options) + # stream_react_component always uses prerender: true + # Setting prerender: false is equivalent to calling react_component with prerender: false + run_stream_inside_fiber do + internal_stream_react_component(component_name, **options, prerender: true, + force_load: options.fetch(:force_load, true))
134-134: Fix trailing whitespace in documentation.Remove trailing whitespace at the end of the line.
-# a special format designed by React for serializing server components and transmitting them +# a special format designed by React for serializing server components and transmitting them
252-256: Fix style issues in hash formatting.There's inconsistent commas in the hash formatting.
redux_store_data = { store_name: store_name, props: props, - force_load: force_load } + force_load: force_load + }
639-639: Use double pipes instead of ternary for nil/false check.Use double pipes (
||) for simpler conditional logic.- "data-trace" => (render_options.trace ? true : nil), + "data-trace" => render_options.trace || nil,🧰 Tools
🪛 RuboCop (1.73)
[convention] 639-639: Use double pipes
||instead.(Style/RedundantCondition)
642-642: Use double pipes instead of ternary for nil/false check.Use double pipes (
||) for simpler conditional logic.- "data-force-load" => (render_options.force_load ? true : nil)) + "data-force-load" => render_options.force_load || nil)🧰 Tools
🪛 RuboCop (1.73)
[convention] 642-642: Use double pipes
||instead.(Style/RedundantCondition)
668-668: Use double pipes instead of ternary for nil/false check.Use double pipes (
||) for simpler conditional logic.- "data-force-load" => (redux_store_data[:force_load] ? true : nil)) + "data-force-load" => redux_store_data[:force_load] || nil)🧰 Tools
🪛 RuboCop (1.73)
[convention] 668-668: Use double pipes
||instead.(Style/RedundantCondition)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb(13 hunks)spec/dummy/spec/helpers/react_on_rails_helper_spec.rb(7 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- spec/dummy/spec/helpers/react_on_rails_helper_spec.rb
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (2)
Learnt from: AbanoubGhadban
PR: shakacode/react_on_rails#1644
File: lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb:190-197
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T13:08:01.477Z
Learning: RSC support validation in React on Rails Pro is handled through a chain of validations:
1. Pro version check in `run_stream_inside_fiber`
2. RSC support check during pack generation via `ReactOnRailsPro.configuration.enable_rsc_support`
3. RSC support validation during component registration
This makes additional validation in the helper methods unnecessary.
Learnt from: AbanoubGhadban
PR: shakacode/react_on_rails#1644
File: lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb:190-197
Timestamp: 2025-02-18T13:08:01.477Z
Learning: RSC support validation is handled in deeper level calls of the React on Rails Pro codebase, so it doesn't need to be validated again in the `rsc_payload_react_component` helper method.
🪛 RuboCop (1.73)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb
[convention] 639-639: Use double pipes || instead.
(Style/RedundantCondition)
[convention] 642-642: Use double pipes || instead.
(Style/RedundantCondition)
[convention] 668-668: Use double pipes || instead.
(Style/RedundantCondition)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build-dummy-app-webpack-test-bundles (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
lib/react_on_rails/helper.rb (5)
134-182: Thorough documentation for React Server Components - good work!The documentation for the RSC payload rendering is comprehensive and provides valuable context for developers, including examples and configuration details.
183-190: Implementation looks good - validation handled at deeper level.Based on the learnings from earlier review cycles, RSC support validation is already handled at deeper levels through:
- Pro version check in
run_stream_inside_fiber- RSC support check during pack generation
- RSC support validation during component registration
670-678: Great enhancement for immediate store loading.The implementation of immediate store loading through the
force_loadparameter is a useful enhancement that allows for better control over store hydration timing.
767-791: Improved Redux store initialization with dependency filtering.The refactored
initialize_redux_storesmethod now efficiently filters for store dependencies, which should improve performance when there are many registered stores but only a few are needed for a particular component.
752-752:✅ Verification successful
Method name change from
stream?tostreaming?.This appears to be a method name change in the
RenderOptionsclass. Ensure that the corresponding method has been updated in theRenderOptionsclass to prevent runtime errors.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the streaming? method exists in RenderOptions class rg -A 5 "def streaming\?" lib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb # Also check if there are any remaining references to stream? rg "\.stream\?" --type rubyLength of output: 319
RenderOptions Method Name Verified
- Confirmed that
RenderOptions#streaming?exists as expected inlib/react_on_rails/react_component/render_options.rb.- Verified that there are no lingering references to
.stream?in the codebase.This change should prevent any runtime errors.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
♻️ Duplicate comments (2)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (2)
35-53: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionEnhance error logging to include stack traces in development environments.
Based on previous feedback and learnings, you should include error stack traces in development and test environments to aid debugging.
onError: (err) => { const error = convertToError(err); - console.error("Error in RSC stream", error); + const isDevOrTest = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test'; + console.error("Error in RSC stream", isDevOrTest ? error.stack : error); if (throwJsErrors) { emitError(error); } renderState.hasErrors = true; renderState.error = error; }
53-60: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionApply consistent error handling for manifest loading errors.
For consistency with the error handling approach in the onError callback, include stack traces in development and test environments for manifest loading errors as well.
}).catch((e) => { const error = convertToError(e); + const isDevOrTest = process.env.NODE_ENV === 'development' || process.env.NODE_ENV === 'test'; + console.error("Error loading manifest", isDevOrTest ? error.stack : error); renderState.hasErrors = true; renderState.error = error; const htmlResult = handleError({ e: error, name: options.name, serverSide: true }); const jsonResult = JSON.stringify(createResultObject(htmlResult, buildConsoleReplay(), renderState)); return stringToStream(jsonResult); });
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
package.json (1)
101-102: Consider if explicit empty dependencies object is necessary.You've added an explicit empty dependencies object. While this is valid, it's generally not necessary to include an empty dependencies object in package.json as it's the default when no dependencies are specified.
- "packageManager": "yarn@1.22.22+sha512.a6b2f7906b721bba3d67d4aff083df04dad64c399707841b7acf00f6b133b7ac24255f2652fa22ae3534329dc6180534e98d17432037ff6fd140556e2bb3137e", - "dependencies": {} + "packageManager": "yarn@1.22.22+sha512.a6b2f7906b721bba3d67d4aff083df04dad64c399707841b7acf00f6b133b7ac24255f2652fa22ae3534329dc6180534e98d17432037ff6fd140556e2bb3137e"
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
yarn.lockis excluded by!**/yarn.lock,!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
.github/workflows/examples.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/lint-js-and-ruby.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/main.yml(2 hunks).github/workflows/package-js-tests.yml(1 hunks)jest.config.js(1 hunks)node_package/src/RSCClientRoot.ts(1 hunks)node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
- .github/workflows/package-js-tests.yml
- .github/workflows/examples.yml
- .github/workflows/lint-js-and-ruby.yml
- .github/workflows/main.yml
- node_package/src/RSCClientRoot.ts
- jest.config.js
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (1)
Learnt from: alexeyr-ci
PR: shakacode/react_on_rails#1644
File: node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts:87-87
Timestamp: 2024-12-12T13:07:09.929Z
Learning: When handling errors in 'node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts', include the error stack in error messages in development and test environments to aid debugging.
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build-dummy-app-webpack-test-bundles (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
node_package/src/ReactOnRailsRSC.ts (6)
5-18: LGTM - Good organization of imports.The imports are well-organized, with clear separation between external dependencies, internal types, and utility functions.
20-25: LGTM - Well-implemented utility function.The
stringToStreamfunction is a clean and effective implementation for converting strings to streams.
27-33: LGTM - Well-structured component rendering setup.The initialization of rendering state with proper typing is well-implemented. The defaults for
isShellReady,hasErrors, andresultare appropriately set.
64-70: LGTM - Good integration with ReactOnRails.The
serverRenderRSCReactComponentmethod is cleanly integrated with the ReactOnRails object, using the stream rendering functionality and properly cleaning up the console history regardless of success or failure.
72-73: LGTM - Proper exports.Exporting all types and the ReactOnRails object is the right approach for this module.
1-1:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify compatibility with the imported package.
Make sure the RSC package
@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rscis properly maintained and compatible with your React version. Previous review comments suggested this might have been a temporary or custom solution.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check the npm package info for the RSC package npm view @shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rsc # Check the package lockfile for actual version resolution if [ -f "yarn.lock" ]; then grep -A 5 "@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rsc" yarn.lock elif [ -f "package-lock.json" ]; then grep -A 5 "@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rsc" package-lock.json fiLength of output: 1016
Attention: RSC Package Compatibility Verification
The package
@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rscis not published to the public npm registry and is instead being resolved from GitHub Packages (locked at version 19.0.0 as shown in your lockfile). Please verify that this specific version (and its dependency onreact-server-dom-webpackv19.0.0) is actively maintained and fully compatible with your current React version. Given that previous notes indicated this might be a temporary or custom solution, it’s important to reassess its long-term suitability for your project.package.json (5)
8-14: LGTM - Well-structured exports configuration.The exports configuration clearly defines the entry points for different environments, including the new React Server Components support via the
react-servercondition and the new server component registration paths.
24-26: LGTM - Appropriate testing libraries.The addition of Testing Library packages will improve the quality of React component tests.
47-48: LGTM - Testing utilities for modern React applications.Adding
jest-fetch-mockandjsdomis appropriate for testing modern React applications, especially when dealing with server components that might involve fetch operations.
3-3:✅ Verification successful
Ensure version meets semantic versioning requirements.
The version
15.0.0-alpha.2correctly indicates this is a major version change with breaking changes. Make sure to thoroughly document these changes in the CHANGELOG and ensure all tests pass before releasing.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if CHANGELOG.md contains information about version 15.0.0 grep -A 10 "15.0.0" CHANGELOG.md || echo "No entry for version 15.0.0 found in CHANGELOG.md"Length of output: 594
Version and CHANGELOG verification passed.
- The
package.jsonentry"15.0.0-alpha.2"correctly follows semantic versioning for a prerelease with breaking changes.- The corresponding CHANGELOG.md entry for
[15.0.0-alpha.2]confirms that the changes have been documented.- Please ensure all tests pass before releasing.
23-23:✅ Verification successful
Verify compatibility with the specific RSC version.
You're using a fixed major version (
^19.0.0) of@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rsc. Ensure this version is compatible with the React version you're using (React 19 in devDependencies).
🌐 Web query:
Is React Server Components fully supported in React 19?💡 Result:
React Server Components (RSCs) are fully supported in React 19 as a stable feature, marking a major shift in React's architecture. Here's a detailed breakdown:
Key Features and Implementation
Stable Core Functionality
RSCs are now production-ready in React 19, enabling components to render exclusively on the server. This reduces client-side JavaScript, improves initial load times, and allows direct server-side data fetching without exposing sensitive logic to the client[1][2][9].
Example:// Server Component (file ends with .server.jsx) async function ProductDetails({ id }) { const product = await db.query(`SELECT * FROM products WHERE id = ${id}`); return <div>{product.name}</div>; }Integration with Frameworks
While React 19 stabilizes RSCs, frameworks like Next.js handle the underlying bundler/framework APIs. These APIs do not follow semver in React 19.x, so frameworks must pin specific React versions or use Canary releases for compatibility[1][4][10].Async Server Components
Server Components can useasync/awaitfor data fetching, enabling streaming HTML and partial rendering via<Suspense>[2][3][7].
Example:async function Page({ slug }) { const post = await fetchPost(slug); return <Article post={post} />; }Directives for Clarity
'use client': Marks Client Components (required for interactivity/state).'use server': Defines Server Actions (server-side functions callable from the client)[9][10].
Benefits and Use Cases
- Performance: Pre-rendered HTML reduces client-side load[5][7].
- Security: Sensitive operations (e.g., database access) stay server-side[6][10].
- SEO: Fully rendered HTML improves search engine indexing[5][9].
Limitations and Considerations
- No Standalone Server Runtime: RSCs require a server environment (e.g., Node.js) and cannot run in static sites without frameworks like Next.js[6].
- Interactivity: Server Components cannot use state/effects; pair them with Client Components for dynamic features[3][10].
- Tooling Maturity: While RSCs are stable, some bundler/framework integrations remain in flux[1][4].
Example Architecture
// Server Component (ProductList.server.jsx) async function ProductList() { const products = await db.query('SELECT * FROM products'); return ( <ul> {products.map((product) => ( <li key={product.id}> <ProductDetails id={product.id} /> {/* Server Component */} <AddToCartButton productId={product.id} /> {/* Client Component */} </li> ))} </ul> ); } // Client Component (AddToCartButton.client.jsx) 'use client'; function AddToCartButton({ productId }) { const [isPending, startTransition] = useTransition(); const handleClick = () => { startTransition(() => addToCart(productId)); // Server Action }; return <button onClick={handleClick}>Add to Cart</button>; } // Server Action (actions.js) 'use server'; async function addToCart(productId) { await db.query('INSERT INTO cart (...) VALUES (...)'); }
Conclusion
React 19 fully supports Server Components, offering a server-first approach for performance and security. While the core feature is stable, developers should use frameworks like Next.js for seamless integration until React’s underlying tooling APIs mature.
Citations:
- 1: https://react.dev/blog/2024/12/05/react-19
- 2: https://www.antstack.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-react-server-components-in-react-19/
- 3: https://www.scalablepath.com/react/react-19-server-components-server-actions
- 4: https://react.dev/reference/rsc/server-components
- 5: https://dev.to/abdulnasirolcan/react-19-new-features-advanced-techniques-and-enhanced-usage-methods-271p
- 6: https://www.wisp.blog/blog/can-react-19-server-components-and-server-actions-work-without-server-runtime
- 7: https://www.mux.com/blog/react-19-server-components-and-actions
- 8: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiiGUjEkzbM
- 9: https://vercel.com/blog/whats-new-in-react-19
- 10: https://www.builder.io/blog/nextjs-react-server-components
Compatibility Confirmed – No Changes Needed
The web query confirms that React Server Components are fully supported in React 19. With the dependency set to^19.0.0for@shakacode-tools/react-on-rails-rsc, everything aligns correctly with React 19 as specified in your devDependencies.
- No changes to the package version are necessary at this time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
19-28: New React Server Components Support EntryThe new "#### Added" section clearly details the introduction of React Server Components support including key benefits such as reduced client bundle sizes and new data-fetching patterns. It also references the full tutorial and links to [PR 1644].
Please ensure that any new public APIs or configuration changes related to RSC support are consistently documented elsewhere (e.g. in the API docs or migration guides) to help users understand how to leverage this new feature.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CHANGELOG.md (1)
29-42: Hydration Improvements and Breaking Changes NoticeThis section outlines important improvements to component and store hydration—such as immediate hydration without waiting for page load, support for
asyncscripts, and the update ofReactOnRails.reactOnRailsPageLoadedto an async function—as well as a significant configuration change whereforce_loadnow defaults totrue.Because these are breaking changes, please double-check that the upgrade/migration documentation is updated to clearly instruct users on any necessary code adjustments or behavior changes. It might also help to point out any potential edge cases for users who previously relied on the old synchronous behavior.
- Add full backtrace to error messages for better diagnostics - Add temporary debugging breakpoint with binding.pry
- Add description for unreleased changes in CHANGELOG - Remove unused entry from knip configuration - Add jsdom as a development dependency in knip config
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
CHANGELOG.md (4)
20-28: Clarify the New RSC Feature Entry
The new “#### Added” section clearly lists the introduction of React Server Components support with concise bullet points. For improved clarity, consider adding brief migration instructions (or links to detailed docs) on any configuration changes that users might need to adopt.
30-42: Detail Breaking Changes and Hydration Improvements
The “#### Improved (Breaking)” section effectively explains the changes related to component/store hydration and specifies thatReactOnRails.reactOnRailsPageLoadedis now async and thatforce_loadnow defaults totrue. It would be beneficial to include a note or link to migration context so that users understand how these breaking changes might affect their setup.
1-5: Version Bump Visibility
Although the AI summary mentions a new version (15.0.0‑alpha.2), the changelog currently shows an “Unreleased” section followed by older version sections (e.g. [14.2.0]). To avoid confusion, please ensure that the version bump (if it is indeed part of this release) is prominently noted once finalized.
43-44: Maintaining Changelog Readability
The changelog is very comprehensive and detailed. As ongoing changes accumulate, consider whether archiving older versions or summarizing them in a separate release-notes document might help new users focus more quickly on recent (and breaking) changes.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)knip.ts(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- knip.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
spec/dummy/spec/helpers/react_on_rails_helper_spec.rb (1)
333-333: Consider redux store hydration implicationsAdding
data-force-load="true"to redux store scripts changes how stores are initialized. This could affect applications that depend on explicit store initialization timing. Ensure this change is documented in your migration guide.Consider adding a test case that explicitly tests the redux store with
force_load: falseto ensure both configurations work correctly.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
spec/dummy/spec/helpers/react_on_rails_helper_spec.rb(8 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
spec/dummy/spec/helpers/react_on_rails_helper_spec.rb (3)
307-307:❓ Verification inconclusive
Confirm the inverted force-load behavior is intentional
The tests now expect opposite behavior for the
force_loadoption - components are force-loaded by default, andforce_load: falsedisables this behavior. This is a significant change from the previous behavior and should be well-documented.Also applies to: 311-315, 317-321
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for implementation of force_load option to verify the behavior change rg "force.?load" --type ruby | grep -v specLength of output: 1541
Inverted Force-load Behavior Verification
The updated tests now reflect that components are force-loaded by default—this is achieved by setting
force_load: truein the configuration (seelib/react_on_rails/configuration.rb) and propagating this default in the helper (seelib/react_on_rails/helper.rb). Please confirm that this inversion (i.e., defaulting to force-loading unless explicitly disabled viaforce_load: false) is intentional and that the change is thoroughly documented given its impact on component hydration behavior.
53-53:❓ Verification inconclusive
Consider the performance impact of disabling script deferrals
The change from
defer: truetodefer: falsemeans JavaScript will execute immediately rather than waiting for document parsing to complete, which might impact page load performance. This change is likely related to supporting React Server Components (RSC), but consider documenting this change and its rationale.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other instances of append_javascript_pack_tag to ensure consistent behavior rg "append_javascript_pack_tag.*defer" --type rubyLength of output: 224
Performance Impact & Documentation of
deferChangeWe've confirmed via the test that the helper invocation now uses
{ defer: false }:expect(helper).to have_received(:append_javascript_pack_tag).with("generated/component_name", { defer: false })Since disabling script deferral causes JavaScript to execute immediately instead of waiting for document parsing to complete, this may affect page load performance. Given that this change likely supports React Server Components, please document the rationale for switching to non-deferred execution and note any potential performance trade-offs.
146-148:✅ Verification successful
Verify the new force-load behavior in documentation
The addition of
data-force-load="true"to component scripts indicates a change in the default behavior for component loading. This appears to support React Server Components but should be properly documented.Also applies to: 155-157
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check documentation for force-load behavior information rg "force.?load" --type mdLength of output: 825
Ensure Documentation Consistency for
force_loadBehaviorThe updated component code now uses
data-force-load="true", which aligns with our recent default change—force_loadnow defaults totrue(previouslyfalse). The CHANGELOG clearly documents this behavior change (including details on disabling it viaforce_load: falseand referencing PR #1620). Please double-check that all user-facing documentation (e.g., README, guides, helper usage notes) also reflects this update, especially regarding any context around React Server Components. Note that this verification applies to changes at both lines 146–148 and 155–157.
- Add comprehensive release notes for version 15.0.0 - Highlight major features: React Server Components support and improved component hydration - Document breaking changes related to component hydration and store dependencies - Summarize key improvements in component and store hydration performance
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md (2)
20-29: Breaking Changes Section: Minor Grammar and Style Adjustments RecommendedSeveral points need minor improvements for clarity and consistency:
- Line 23: Consider hyphenating “full-page load” when used as a compound adjective. For example:
-... without waiting for the full page load. +... without waiting for the full-page load.- Line 25: The verb should be “makes” instead of “make.”
-The `force_load` configuration make `react-on-rails` hydrate... +The `force_load` configuration makes `react-on-rails` hydrate...- Line 28: Rephrase for better grammatical flow. A suggested rewrite:
-Redux store support `force_load` option now and it uses `config.force_load` value as the default value. Which means that the redux store will hydrate immediately as soon as its server-side data reaches the client. +Redux store support for the `force_load` option now uses `config.force_load` as its default value, meaning that the Redux store hydrates immediately once its server-side data reaches the client.These improvements will enhance readability and maintain consistency.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...l hydrate early without waiting for the full page load. This improves performance by elim...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...ded. - Theforce_loadconfiguration makereact-on-railshydrate components imm...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...hes the client, without waiting for the full page load. - If you want to keep the previ...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~27-~27: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...zers/react_on_rails.rbfile. - If we want to keep the original behavior offorce_lo...(REP_WANT_TO_VB)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...ce_loadconfiguration. - Redux store supportforce_loadoption now and it usesco...(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ux store supportforce_loadoption now and it usesconfig.force_loadvalue as th...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
61-76: Code Example for Declaring Store Dependencies: Verify Inline Comment StyleThe ERB code example is informative and includes inline comments (e.g., on lines 69 and 73) to clarify behavior. However, please verify that using HTML comments inside the JavaScript object literals within the ERB file does not inadvertently lead to rendering issues when users copy and paste the code. You might consider either removing these inline comments in the production example or formatting them in a way that does not affect the syntax.
CHANGELOG.md (1)
23-26: Added Features Section Clarity
The new features are clearly listed under "#### Added":
- React Server Components Support (Pro Feature)
- Improved component and store hydration performance
Consider adding or referencing a brief note about any migration details if these features require configuration adjustments or document updates in the API docs.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
CHANGELOG.md(1 hunks)docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...l hydrate early without waiting for the full page load. This improves performance by elim...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: This verb does not appear to agree with the subject. Consider using a different form.
Context: ...ded. - The force_load configuration make react-on-rails hydrate components imm...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_VERB_AGREEMENT)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...hes the client, without waiting for the full page load. - If you want to keep the previ...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~27-~27: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...zers/react_on_rails.rbfile. - If we want to keep the original behavior offorce_lo...
(REP_WANT_TO_VB)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: The grammatical number of this noun doesn’t look right. Consider replacing it.
Context: ...ce_loadconfiguration. - Redux store supportforce_loadoption now and it usesco...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_REPLACEMENT_NOUN_NUMBER)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ux store support force_load option now and it uses config.force_load value as th...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
🔇 Additional comments (8)
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md (6)
1-2: Release Note Title and Version DeclarationThe header clearly states the release version (15.0.0). This is important for tracking changes and communicating the update.
3-11: React Server Components (RSC) Feature Section is Well-DocumentedThe section introduces RSC support effectively and even provides a link to the full tutorial for React on Rails Pro. Ensure that any further documentation (for example, in configuration files or usage examples) matches this description.
12-19: Improved Component Hydration Section is ClearThe explanation regarding immediate hydration of components and stores is well-explained. The removal of the need for the
deferattribute is a clear takeaway.
30-40: Async Function Update forreactOnRailsPageLoaded()is Effectively CommunicatedThe before-and-after sample code blocks clearly illustrate the change to an async function. Ensure that users update their calls accordingly by awaiting the promise.
42-60: Redux Store Dependencies Section Provides Clear GuidanceThe section on explicitly declaring store dependencies is well-detailed. This clear explanation should help users optimize hydration behavior.
80-83: Pull Requests Section Accurately References Related WorkListing associated PRs with direct links is very helpful for context. Confirm that all links are up to date and that the descriptions accurately reflect the changes.
CHANGELOG.md (2)
21-22: Release Notes Link Added – Verify Link Validity
A release notes link has been inserted:See [Release Notes](docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md) for full details.Please confirm that the linked file is published and the URL is correct once the RSC documentation merge is complete.
27-31:❓ Verification inconclusive
Breaking Changes – Ensure Documentation and Migration Guidance
The "#### Breaking Changes" section highlights that:
ReactOnRails.reactOnRailsPageLoadedis now asynchronous.- The
force_loadconfiguration now defaults totrue.- The
defer_generated_component_packsconfiguration now defaults tofalse.It is important to ensure that these breaking changes are also clearly communicated in the migration guide and relevant API documentation so that developers understand how to update their usage.
Could you please run the above script and share the output? This will help verify whether the breaking changes documented in the CHANGELOG are accompanied by updated migration guidance.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any markdown files mentioning "migration guide" to verify if there's an existing migration guide. rg -i "migration guide" -g "*.md"Length of output: 382
Documentation Update: Verify Migration Guide and API Docs for Breaking Changes
The changelog now lists these critical updates:
ReactOnRails.reactOnRailsPageLoadedis now asynchronous,force_loadconfiguration defaults totrue, anddefer_generated_component_packsconfiguration defaults tofalse.Since the changelog already includes a reference to the migration guide, please ensure that the guide and any relevant API documentation are updated to clearly explain these changes and the necessary migration steps for developers.
…support multiple components in the view
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md (1)
20-29: Detailed Breakdown of Breaking Changes for Component HydrationThis section provides a thorough explanation of the configuration changes:
- The descriptions are clear about the new defaults for
defer_generated_component_packs(nowfalse) andforce_load(nowtrue).- On line 27, the phrasing is repetitive with nearby explanations. Consider varying the language to maintain reader engagement.
- On line 28, the explanation is split into two sentences, where the second sentence ("Which means that…") reads like a fragment. It would be clearer to combine these sentences. For example:
-Redux store support `force_load` option now and it uses `config.force_load` value as the default value. Which means that the redux store will hydrate immediately as soon as its server-side data reaches the client. You can override this behavior for individual redux stores by setting `force_load: false` in the `redux_store` helper. +Redux store support for the `force_load` option now uses `config.force_load` as its default, meaning that the Redux store will hydrate immediately when its server-side data reaches the client. You can override this behavior for individual redux stores by setting `force_load: false` in the `redux_store` helper.Additionally, consider reviewing compound adjectives—e.g., if “full page load” is used as a modifier, hyphenating it as “full‑page load” may improve clarity (if it aligns with your style guidelines).
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...l hydrate early without waiting for the full page load. This improves performance by elim...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...hes the client, without waiting for the full page load. - If you want to keep the previ...(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~27-~27: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...zers/react_on_rails.rbfile. - If we want to keep the original behavior offorce_lo...(REP_WANT_TO_VB)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ux store supportforce_loadoption now and it usesconfig.force_loadvalue as th...(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md
[uncategorized] ~23-~23: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...l hydrate early without waiting for the full page load. This improves performance by elim...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[uncategorized] ~25-~25: If this is a compound adjective that modifies the following noun, use a hyphen.
Context: ...hes the client, without waiting for the full page load. - If you want to keep the previ...
(EN_COMPOUND_ADJECTIVE_INTERNAL)
[style] ~27-~27: You have already used this phrasing in nearby sentences. Consider replacing it to add variety to your writing.
Context: ...zers/react_on_rails.rbfile. - If we want to keep the original behavior offorce_lo...
(REP_WANT_TO_VB)
[uncategorized] ~28-~28: Use a comma before ‘and’ if it connects two independent clauses (unless they are closely connected and short).
Context: ...ux store support force_load option now and it uses config.force_load value as th...
(COMMA_COMPOUND_SENTENCE)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: dummy-app-integration-tests (oldest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (newest)
- GitHub Check: rspec-package-tests (oldest)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
docs/release-notes/15.0.0.md (4)
1-11: Clear Introduction for React Server Components SupportThe release notes clearly introduce the new React Server Components feature with concise bullet points and a helpful link to the full tutorial. This section sets the right context for the major update.
12-19: Concise Overview of Improved Component HydrationThe bullet points effectively summarize the enhancements in component and store hydration. Consider explicitly noting how the removal of the
deferrequirement helps prevent race conditions during page load.
30-40: Clarification on Async Behavior ofreactOnRailsPageLoaded()The before-and-after code example is clear and does a good job of illustrating the move to an async function. Emphasize to users in the documentation that they must now use
awaitwithReactOnRails.reactOnRailsPageLoaded()to ensure proper hydration timing.
42-79: Comprehensive Explanation of Store Dependencies for ComponentsThe section excellently details the problem with deferred Redux store hydration and provides a step-by-step solution using clear ERB examples. This guidance should help users understand the need to explicitly declare store dependencies for optimized hydration.
Summary
RSC_in_RORP.mp4
Remove this paragraph and provide a general description of the code changes in your pull
request... were there any bugs you had fixed? If so, mention them. If
these bugs have open GitHub issues, be sure to tag them here as well,
to keep the conversation linked together.
Pull Request checklist
Remove this line after checking all the items here. If the item is not applicable to the PR, both check it out and wrap it by
~.Add the CHANGELOG entry at the top of the file.
Other Information
Remove this paragraph and mention any other important and relevant information such as benchmarks.
This change is
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Breaking Changes
force_loadconfiguration to true.defer_generated_component_packsfromtruetofalse.Documentation