move autodiff from EnzymeAD/Enzyme to our rust-lang/Enzyme soft-fork #139225
+1
−1
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum. Use |
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
This is moving to a |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
Rollup of 14 pull requests Successful merges: - rust-lang#135295 (Check empty SIMD vector in inline asm) - rust-lang#138003 (Add the new `amx` target features and the `movrs` target feature) - rust-lang#138823 (rustc_target: RISC-V: add base `I`-related important extensions) - rust-lang#138913 (Remove even more instances of `@ts-expect-error` from search.js) - rust-lang#138941 (Do not mix normalized and unnormalized caller bounds when constructing param-env for `receiver_is_dispatchable`) - rust-lang#139060 (replace commit placeholder in vendor status with actual commit) - rust-lang#139102 (coverage: Avoid splitting spans during span extraction/refinement) - rust-lang#139191 (small opaque type/borrowck cleanup) - rust-lang#139200 (Skip suggest impl or dyn when poly trait is not a real trait) - rust-lang#139208 (fix dead link netbsd.md) - rust-lang#139210 (chore: remove redundant backtick) - rust-lang#139212 (Update mdbook to 0.4.48) - rust-lang#139214 (Tell rustfmt to use the 2024 edition in ./x.py fmt) - rust-lang#139225 (move autodiff from EnzymeAD/Enzyme to our rust-lang/Enzyme soft-fork) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#139225 - EnzymeAD:rust-lang-enzyme, r=jieyouxu move autodiff from EnzymeAD/Enzyme to our rust-lang/Enzyme soft-fork In rust-lang/team#1665 we decided to have a soft-fork of Enzyme, to be able to merge e.g. CI, docs, or cmake improvements if upstream is not interested in them. We don't intend to merge logic/code changes. It also seems generally preferable if we clone submodules from a rust-lang repo, instead of an external org. We don't build or checkout Enzyme yet by default, so this should be a safe rollup.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In rust-lang/team#1665 we decided to have a soft-fork of Enzyme, to be able to merge e.g. CI, docs, or cmake improvements if upstream is not interested in them. We don't intend to merge logic/code changes. It also seems generally preferable if we clone submodules from a rust-lang repo, instead of an external org. We don't build or checkout Enzyme yet by default, so this should be a safe rollup.