-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove NtExpr
and NtLiteral
#138478
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Remove NtExpr
and NtLiteral
#138478
Conversation
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
1b55759
to
7f6b06c
Compare
Could not assign reviewer from: |
@bors try @rust-timer queue |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
…try> Remove `NtExpr` and `NtLiteral` The next part of rust-lang#124141. r? `@petrochenkov`
@rustbot ready |
☀️ Try build successful - checks-actions |
Finished benchmarking commit (2f5db75): comparison URL. Overall result: ❌✅ regressions and improvements - please read the text belowBenchmarking this pull request likely means that it is perf-sensitive, so we're automatically marking it as not fit for rolling up. While you can manually mark this PR as fit for rollup, we strongly recommend not doing so since this PR may lead to changes in compiler perf. Next Steps: If you can justify the regressions found in this try perf run, please indicate this with @bors rollup=never Instruction countThis is the most reliable metric that we have; it was used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment. However, even this metric can sometimes exhibit noise.
Max RSS (memory usage)Results (primary 1.6%, secondary -4.3%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
CyclesResults (primary 1.7%, secondary 8.5%)This is a less reliable metric that may be of interest but was not used to determine the overall result at the top of this comment.
Binary sizeThis benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric. Bootstrap: missing data |
The perf regressions have been seen previously in #124141, with the @rustbot label: +perf-regression-triaged |
7f6b06c
to
37af248
Compare
Thanks for the review. I have added two new commits addressing the comments. @rustbot ready |
940f8ca
to
bf56100
Compare
I rebased. @bors r=petrochenkov |
…etrochenkov Remove `NtExpr` and `NtLiteral` The next part of rust-lang#124141. r? `@petrochenkov`
⌛ Testing commit bf56100 with merge 8eca53eb16abd601c3b76002f3df69bc464a67f7... |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Seems unrelated to this PR. @bors retry |
…etrochenkov Remove `NtExpr` and `NtLiteral` The next part of rust-lang#124141. r? `@petrochenkov`
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
This is the same failure as the previous time (maybe due to OOM?), but let's try again. |
…etrochenkov Remove `NtExpr` and `NtLiteral` The next part of rust-lang#124141. r? `@petrochenkov`
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
|
💔 Test failed - checks-actions |
The next part of #124141.
r? @petrochenkov