Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make std/src/num mirror core/src/num #137574

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

tgross35
Copy link
Contributor

The float modules in std are currently top-level but for core, they are nested within the num directory and referenced by #[path = ...]. For consistency, adjust std to use the same structure as core.

Also change the f16 and f128 gates from outer attributes to inner attributes like core has.

The float modules in `std` are currently top-level but for `core`, they
are nested within the `num` directory and referenced by `#[path = ...]`.
For consistency, adjust `std` to use the same structure as `core`.

Also change the `f16` and `f128` gates from outer attributes to inner
attributes like `core` has.
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Feb 25, 2025

r? @workingjubilee

rustbot has assigned @workingjubilee.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 25, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors commented Mar 21, 2025

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #138768) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

??? why didn't I see this in my queue on previous checks?

@workingjubilee
Copy link
Member

workingjubilee commented Mar 24, 2025

oh wait, I see, I remember...

...uh, can we just pub use $path in appropriate locations?

I think I withheld comment because I was going to take a closer look to validate whether that was doable before I left the review comment, but that was an inappropriate delay and I should have left the comment, then doublechecked if I had spare energy. Sorry.

@workingjubilee workingjubilee added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants