Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method #134154

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor

@oriongonza oriongonza commented Dec 10, 2024

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without ()

r? estebank
Fixes #67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Dec 10, 2024
@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@compiler-errors compiler-errors left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please address the nits, then I can approve.

And also fix the test file to not mention "issue". It's redundant -- leave a comment inside saying // Regression test for <...> if you want.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Also please give this a more descriptive error message. This is approximately the most generic message that could exist currently 😆

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Whoops I misspoke in the last comment--I meant that this needs a better PR title :)

@oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Oh I was actually changing the error message :P

@oriongonza oriongonza changed the title Fix confusing error message suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method Dec 11, 2024
@oriongonza
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now that I'm on it, do you think that
"attempted to access {field}on type{expr_t} as a field when it's a method",
is better than
"attempted to access field {field}on type{expr_t}",
?

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

I think the error message is fine as-is

@rust-log-analyzer

This comment has been minimized.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 11, 2024

📌 Commit 014363e has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 11, 2024
jieyouxu added a commit to jieyouxu/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…mpiler-errors

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without `()`

r? estebank
Fixes rust-lang#67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122003 (link libunwind dynamically and allow controlling it via `crt-static` on gnullvm targets)
 - rust-lang#133122 (Add unpolished, experimental support for AFIDT (async fn in dyn trait))
 - rust-lang#133859 (Move some alloc tests to the alloctests crate)
 - rust-lang#134070 (Some asm! diagnostic adjustments and a papercut fix)
 - rust-lang#134095 ([CI] Use a lockfile for installing the `datadog` package)
 - rust-lang#134144 (Properly consider APITs for never type fallback ascription fix)
 - rust-lang#134152 (Simplify `rustc_mir_dataflow::abs_domain`.)
 - rust-lang#134154 (suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method)
 - rust-lang#134155 (Forbid `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for Hurd)
 - rust-lang#134173 (allow `symbol_intern_string_literal` lint in test modules)
 - rust-lang#134178 (Stabilize the Rust 2024 prelude)
 - rust-lang#134179 (Remove outdated consteval note from `<*mut T>::align_offset` docs.)
 - rust-lang#134187 (Remove `PErr`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
…iaskrgr

Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#122003 (link libunwind dynamically and allow controlling it via `crt-static` on gnullvm targets)
 - rust-lang#133859 (Move some alloc tests to the alloctests crate)
 - rust-lang#134070 (Some asm! diagnostic adjustments and a papercut fix)
 - rust-lang#134144 (Properly consider APITs for never type fallback ascription fix)
 - rust-lang#134152 (Simplify `rustc_mir_dataflow::abs_domain`.)
 - rust-lang#134154 (suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method)
 - rust-lang#134155 (Forbid `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` for Hurd)
 - rust-lang#134173 (allow `symbol_intern_string_literal` lint in test modules)
 - rust-lang#134178 (Stabilize the Rust 2024 prelude)
 - rust-lang#134179 (Remove outdated consteval note from `<*mut T>::align_offset` docs.)
 - rust-lang#134187 (Remove `PErr`.)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 1d78422 into rust-lang:master Dec 12, 2024
6 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.85.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
rust-timer added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2024
Rollup merge of rust-lang#134154 - dev-ardi:field-expr-generics, r=compiler-errors

suppress field expr with generics error message if it's a method

Don't emit "field expressions may not have generic arguments" if it's a method call without `()`

r? estebank
Fixes rust-lang#67680

Is this the best way to go? It's by far the simplest I could come up with.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Confusing hint on missing parentheses after collect<>
6 participants