rustdoc-json: Add test for #[automatically_derived] attribute #110406
+14
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
rustbot
added
A-rustdoc-json
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
fbstj
reviewed
Apr 16, 2023
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
rdj-derived-impl-attr
branch
from
283bcf0 to
46e1841
Compare
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
rust-cloud-vms
bot
force-pushed
the
rdj-derived-impl-attr
branch
from
46e1841 to
5d42b16
Compare
|
The job Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot) |
|
@aDotInTheVoid any updates on this? thanks |
|
still blocked on changing json path implementation. this is something i’d like to do, but low priority |
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2025
…uillaumeGomez jsondocck: Replace `jsonpath_lib` with `jsonpath-rust` The current jsonpath implementation we use isn't spec-compliant, and is buggy. See freestrings/jsonpath#91 To solve it, it's replaced with https://github.com/besok/jsonpath-rust. This is spec-compiant, and doesn't have a really awkward bug we need to always dance around. Unfortunately, this requires rewriting almost every test, as the behaviour of `[?(`@`,` which is *extremely* common was changed. (But the new behaviour makes way more sense, and isn't buggy with tripply nested selectors) Unblocks rust-lang#110406. Makes rust-lang#100515 much easier as we don't need to explain the broken JSONPath implementation Best reviewed commit-by-commit. The first does the replacement. The next two rewrite the test-suite mechanically. The last rewrites the test-suite by hand. r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2025
…uillaumeGomez jsondocck: Replace `jsonpath_lib` with `jsonpath-rust` The current jsonpath implementation we use isn't spec-compliant, and is buggy. See freestrings/jsonpath#91 To solve it, it's replaced with https://github.com/besok/jsonpath-rust. This is spec-compiant, and doesn't have a really awkward bug we need to always dance around. Unfortunately, this requires rewriting almost every test, as the behaviour of `[?(``@`,`` which is *extremely* common was changed. (But the new behaviour makes way more sense, and isn't buggy with tripply nested selectors) Unblocks rust-lang#110406. Makes rust-lang#100515 much easier as we don't need to explain the broken JSONPath implementation Best reviewed commit-by-commit. The first does the replacement. The next two rewrite the test-suite mechanically. The last rewrites the test-suite by hand. r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
matthiaskrgr
added a commit
to matthiaskrgr/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2025
…uillaumeGomez jsondocck: Replace `jsonpath_lib` with `jsonpath-rust` The current jsonpath implementation we use isn't spec-compliant, and is buggy. See freestrings/jsonpath#91 To solve it, it's replaced with https://github.com/besok/jsonpath-rust. This is spec-compiant, and doesn't have a really awkward bug we need to always dance around. Unfortunately, this requires rewriting almost every test, as the behaviour of `[?(```@`,``` which is *extremely* common was changed. (But the new behaviour makes way more sense, and isn't buggy with tripply nested selectors) Unblocks rust-lang#110406. Makes rust-lang#100515 much easier as we don't need to explain the broken JSONPath implementation Best reviewed commit-by-commit. The first does the replacement. The next two rewrite the test-suite mechanically. The last rewrites the test-suite by hand. r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
rust-timer
added a commit
to rust-lang-ci/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2025
Rollup merge of rust-lang#138763 - aDotInTheVoid:two-years-later, r=GuillaumeGomez jsondocck: Replace `jsonpath_lib` with `jsonpath-rust` The current jsonpath implementation we use isn't spec-compliant, and is buggy. See freestrings/jsonpath#91 To solve it, it's replaced with https://github.com/besok/jsonpath-rust. This is spec-compiant, and doesn't have a really awkward bug we need to always dance around. Unfortunately, this requires rewriting almost every test, as the behaviour of `[?(```@`,``` which is *extremely* common was changed. (But the new behaviour makes way more sense, and isn't buggy with tripply nested selectors) Unblocks rust-lang#110406. Makes rust-lang#100515 much easier as we don't need to explain the broken JSONPath implementation Best reviewed commit-by-commit. The first does the replacement. The next two rewrite the test-suite mechanically. The last rewrites the test-suite by hand. r? ```@GuillaumeGomez```
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Will fail CI due to freestrings/jsonpath#91, but I wrote the test and don't want to forget it.
We should look into fixing the freestrings impl, or moving to a different one, so we can test things like this. Zulip Disussion
r? @ghost
@rustbot blocked