Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

remove ignore in res_scanner #7280

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025
Merged

remove ignore in res_scanner #7280

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

tsnobip
Copy link
Contributor

@tsnobip tsnobip commented Feb 6, 2025

Apply recommendation from #7279 (comment)

@tsnobip tsnobip force-pushed the remove-ignore-scanner branch from 0788fee to 39eddf6 Compare February 6, 2025 08:47
@tsnobip tsnobip requested review from cknitt, chenglou and shulhi and removed request for chenglou February 6, 2025 08:48
@tsnobip tsnobip force-pushed the remove-ignore-scanner branch from 39eddf6 to 0b04268 Compare February 6, 2025 08:51
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Syntax Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.05.

Benchmark suite Current: 0b04268 Previous: e1b7fb7 Ratio
Parse RedBlackTree.res - time/run 1.36870282 ms 1.2123143266666667 ms 1.13
Parse Napkinscript.res - time/run 42.59252720666667 ms 39.28006235333333 ms 1.08
Parse HeroGraphic.res - time/run 5.739099826666666 ms 5.13472718 ms 1.12

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

@cknitt cknitt merged commit 5ce146f into master Feb 8, 2025
20 checks passed
@cknitt cknitt deleted the remove-ignore-scanner branch February 8, 2025 07:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants