Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue with ppx and await. #7262

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

Fix issue with ppx and await. #7262

merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

cristianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

Fix issue where attributes on an application were not preserved by the AST conversion for ppx.

Fixes #7261

@cristianoc cristianoc requested a review from cknitt January 30, 2025 09:07
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Performance Alert ⚠️

Possible performance regression was detected for benchmark 'Syntax Benchmarks'.
Benchmark result of this commit is worse than the previous benchmark result exceeding threshold 1.05.

Benchmark suite Current: 931570c Previous: e1b7fb7 Ratio
Parse RedBlackTree.res - time/run 1.3556831999999999 ms 1.2123143266666667 ms 1.12
Parse Napkinscript.res - time/run 41.936134839999994 ms 39.28006235333333 ms 1.07
Parse HeroGraphic.res - time/run 6.342258433333333 ms 5.13472718 ms 1.24

This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.

Copy link
Member

@cknitt cknitt left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the very quick fix! I can confirm that it resolves the problem. 🎉

Fix issue where attributes on an application were not preserved by the AST conversion for ppx.

Fixes #7261
@cristianoc cristianoc merged commit bb663bd into master Jan 30, 2025
20 checks passed
@cristianoc cristianoc deleted the await-ppx branch January 30, 2025 09:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect type for await result when using PPX
2 participants