Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make untagged variants understand payloads defined as records. #6208

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 26, 2023

Conversation

cristianoc
Copy link
Collaborator

When a payload A(t) is a type t defined as a record, consider A as an object case, not an unknown case.

(unless t is an unboxed record)

When a payload `A(t)` is a type `t` defined as a record, consider `A` as an object case, not an unknown case.

(unless t is an unboxed record)
@cristianoc cristianoc force-pushed the untagged_variant_record branch from 9467674 to df9b01a Compare April 26, 2023 08:27
@cristianoc cristianoc added this to the v11.0 milestone Apr 26, 2023
@cristianoc cristianoc requested a review from zth April 26, 2023 08:27
@cristianoc cristianoc merged commit cfdfc1e into master Apr 26, 2023
@cristianoc cristianoc deleted the untagged_variant_record branch April 26, 2023 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant