Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Nit fix the missing include of thread #8988

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

qlzh727
Copy link

@qlzh727 qlzh727 commented Mar 19, 2025

Notice this in our internal build system. std::this_thread::yield() would require the include of thread.

Notice this in our internal build system. `std::this_thread::yield()` would require the include of thread.
Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented Mar 19, 2025

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/pytorch/vision/8988

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link

Hi @qlzh727!

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community.

Action Required

In order to merge any pull request (code, docs, etc.), we require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have one on file for you.

Process

In order for us to review and merge your suggested changes, please sign at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need to sign the corporate CLA.

Once the CLA is signed, our tooling will perform checks and validations. Afterwards, the pull request will be tagged with CLA signed. The tagging process may take up to 1 hour after signing. Please give it that time before contacting us about it.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@meta.com. Thanks!

@qlzh727
Copy link
Author

qlzh727 commented Mar 19, 2025

Not sure why the cla check failed, I have contributed to pytorch/pytorch project and the CLA should be under Google. Could any maintainer help me check for that? Thanks.

@NicolasHug
Copy link
Member

Hi @qlzh727 , I don't recommend that you keep relying on the torchvision video decoder - we're deprecating it in favor of torchcodec: https://github.com/pytorch/torchcodec

@qlzh727
Copy link
Author

qlzh727 commented Mar 20, 2025

Hi @qlzh727 , I don't recommend that you keep relying on the torchvision video decoder - we're deprecating it in favor of torchcodec: https://github.com/pytorch/torchcodec

Ah, thanks for the information. Will keep that in mind. We don't actively rely on it, we just host it as a framework team, and need to make sure it is building correctly.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants