bug fix to annotation example: restoring an accidently deleted figure creation line #5255
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The inadvertent deletion was here: |
|
Looks good to me, @LiamConnors all good for you too? |
|
Thanks for catching that. Looks good to me @rl-utility-man |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The line that created the figure in #4873 got deleted during the revision process. Currently, the "Specifying Source Lines or Figure Notes on the Bottom of a Figure" example adds its annotations to the fig from the prior example code block, with unintended results. This PR adds the intended figure to the example by restoring the missing line. The inserted line is nearly identical to a line from the first commit to #4873.