Advanced Web3 / Blockchain

[DIVYANSHUSINGHNIYA]

Select Topic Area

Question

Body

How can I implement gasless transactions on Ethereum using meta-transactions without compromising security?

[DIVYANSHUSINGHNIYA]

i think this the answer of my question

[RamprakashRP]

You can implement gasless transactions on Ethereum using meta-transactions without compromising security by relying on a trusted relayer network and a secure smart contract standard like EIP-2771. This approach ensures that the user's identity is preserved and the transaction is protected against replay attacks and other vulnerabilities.

Understanding the Core Components
A meta-transaction is a two-step process that decouples the user from the entity that pays for the transaction. The user signs an off-chain message, and a third party, called a relayer, submits this message as a transaction on-chain. The relayer pays the gas fee and receives compensation for it, either from the dApp owner or by some other mechanism.

User: Creates a transaction message with a unique identifier (a nonce) and signs it with their private key. The user does not need to hold ETH for gas.

Relayer: A third-party service that receives the signed message. It wraps the user's signed message into a standard Ethereum transaction, pays the gas fee, and sends it to a special smart contract.

Smart Contract: The target contract on the blockchain. It verifies the user's signature and nonce to ensure the message is authentic and has not been used before, then executes the requested action.

The Role of EIP-2771 for Security
To ensure security, meta-transactions must adhere to a standard that protects against common attacks, most notably replay attacks.

EIP-2771 (Secure Protocol for Native Meta-Transactions) is a widely adopted standard for this. It addresses security concerns by:

A "Trusted Forwarder" Model: EIP-2771 introduces a TrustedForwarder contract. The dApp's main contract only trusts transactions coming from this specific forwarder.

Secure Signature Verification: The TrustedForwarder contract verifies the user's signature and the nonce of the transaction to prevent the same signed message from being replayed.

Preserving msg.sender: To make the process seamless for developers, contracts adhering to EIP-2771 inherit from a special contract that modifies the _msgSender() function. This ensures that the original user's address (and not the relayer's address) is returned when the contract calls msg.sender, preserving the original transaction context.

How to Implement It Securely
Instead of building a relayer network from scratch, which is complex and risky, the safest and most common approach is to use a pre-built solution like the Gas Station Network (GSN) or OpenZeppelin Defender.

Use a Pre-built Framework: The GSN is a decentralized network of relayers that automatically handle the complexities of relaying, paying for gas, and managing transaction logic.

Modify Your Smart Contract: Your target smart contract must be made "meta-transaction aware." You can do this easily by inheriting from the ERC2771Context or BaseRelayRecipient contracts provided by libraries like OpenZeppelin Contracts.

Replace msg.sender: Wherever your contract uses msg.sender, you must replace it with the _msgSender() function. This is a critical step to ensure that the contract correctly identifies the user who signed the message, not the relayer who sent it.

Integrate Client-Side: On the front end, you'll use a library to sign the off-chain message and send it to the relayer network. The relayer will then submit the transaction to your smart contract. This provides the user with a gasless experience while the dApp sponsor (or the relayer) covers the cost.