test: address coverity issue

[mhdawson]

Coverity is reporting issues with negative
returns. I think that is because

size_t page = GetPageSize();

will always result in page being positive even if GetPageSize fails and returns -1 since size_t cannot be negative. This then would result n the check right afterwards not catching the failure.

Fix by converting to size_t after we do the check.

Signed-off-by: Michael Dawson mdawson@devrus.com

[mhdawson]

Reports from coverity

---

*** CID 278353:  Error handling issues  (NEGATIVE_RETURNS)
/test/cctest/test_crypto_clienthello.cc: 57 in OverrunGuardedBuffer<(unsigned long)5>::OverrunGuardedBuffer()()
51         size_t page = GetPageSize();
52         EXPECT_GE(page, N);
53     #endif
54     #ifdef USE_MPROTECT
55         // Place the packet right before a guard page, which, when accessed, causes
56         // a segmentation fault.
>>>     CID 278353:  Error handling issues  (NEGATIVE_RETURNS)
>>>     "page" is passed to a parameter that cannot be negative.
57         alloc_base = static_cast<uint8_t*>(aligned_alloc(page, 2 * page));
58         EXPECT_NE(alloc_base, nullptr);
59         uint8_t* second_page = alloc_base + page;
60         EXPECT_EQ(mprotect(second_page, page, PROT_NONE), 0);
61         data_base = second_page - N;
62     #elif defined(USE_VIRTUALPROTECT)

[nodejs-github-bot]

CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/46862/

[tniessen]

I might be missing something but I don't see how this helps. GoogleTest's EXPECT_GE does not stop execution, it just logs an error. (I didn't know this at first, which is why I used EXPECT_GE in GetPageSize(), see #44795.)

[tniessen]

size_t page = GetPageSize();

will always result in page being positive even if GetPageSize fails and returns -1 since size_t cannot be negative. This then would result n the check right afterwards not catching the failure.

Fix by converting to size_t after we do the check.

That's kind of exactly what GetPageSize() does internally: assign to an int first, check that it is positive, then cast to size_t :)

[mhdawson]

@tniessen I can't remember what I was thinking at this point, but I see your point so closing.