lib: restate the code to use primordials#36552
Conversation
dfa522c to
07855be
Compare
aduh95
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Can you also replace those please:
node/lib/internal/validators.js
Line 66 in f28715d
node/lib/internal/validators.js
Line 201 in f28715d
|
@aduh95 - yes, I modified the changes. PTAL |
|
Commit message should indicate where we are using more primordials. Maybe this? |
|
Removed |
It looks like the benchmark is for |
Trott
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
LGTM if no benchmark or CI issues.
|
@Trott - Thanks for the review. without fully knowing it, I left the default values in jenkins interface. |
|
Benchmark result : https://ci.nodejs.org/view/Node.js%20benchmark/job/benchmark-node-micro-benchmarks/782/console is this performance result within allowable limits? |
81f7df1 to
5188055
Compare
PR-URL: nodejs#36552 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
64fbf93 to
0538749
Compare
|
Landed in 0538749 |
PR-URL: #36552 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes