doc: remove default parameter value from header#33752
Closed
Trott wants to merge 0 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Closed
doc: remove default parameter value from header#33752Trott wants to merge 0 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Trott wants to merge 0 commit intonodejs:masterfrom
Conversation
addaleax
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2020
lpinca
approved these changes
Jun 5, 2020
trivikr
approved these changes
Jun 7, 2020
Trott
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2020
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the list below the header. There is one exception where we use default parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs instead. I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though, let's get the docs consistent. PR-URL: #33752 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Member
Author
|
Landed in 55d9833 |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 18, 2020
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the list below the header. There is one exception where we use default parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs instead. I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though, let's get the docs consistent. PR-URL: #33752 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2020
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the list below the header. There is one exception where we use default parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs instead. I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though, let's get the docs consistent. PR-URL: #33752 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 9, 2020
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the list below the header. There is one exception where we use default parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs instead. I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though, let's get the docs consistent. PR-URL: #33752 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 14, 2020
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the list below the header. There is one exception where we use default parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs instead. I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though, let's get the docs consistent. PR-URL: #33752 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Trivikram Kamat <trivikr.dev@gmail.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In the docs, we specify the default value of function parameters in the
list below the header. There is one exception where we use default
parameter notation. Change that instance to be like the rest of the docs
instead.
I rather like the default parameter notation, and I get why we didn't
use it to begin with. (The notation didn't exist in JavaScript at the
time.) I wouldn't mind switching to it, but that would result in big
churn. That can be a separate topic of discussion. For now, though,
let's get the docs consistent.
Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passes