Conversation
doc/STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Nit: Perhaps this should link to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dash#Em_dash instead?
372f293 to
0312e28
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
those the commits -> those commits?
gibfahn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Assorted nits (many from the existing text, but while you're here...)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I didn't realise this was in the guide, I remember @MylesBorins suggested we remove it in the original PR, as it will get out of date every few months.
As this info is basically duplicated in the LTS schedule, maybe link to that in ## Staging branches and remove the whole ### Active staging branches section.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about:
(v4.xandv6.x as of March 2017) -> (see the [LTS Plan][]) and then remove Please see the [LTS Plan][] for more information. from the next line.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
that a backport is needed. -> requesting that a backport pull request be made
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think this should be done until the PR lands.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Moved it out of the numbered list, PTAL.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All backport PRs are reviewed, what exactly is your meaning here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is maybe just me, but I feel like a. b. c. is more natural than another set of numbers.
|
@gibfahn PTAL |
gibfahn
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Mostly done, one nit and one thing I just noticed we don't specify.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
While you're here, could you add a note saying that you should run CI as well? Just node-test-pull-request with the default settings.
Refs: #13835 (comment)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[] seems reasonable, but why require the #PR NUMBER? That seems like noise, especially if you have the commit message in the PR description (the PR-URL is a clickable link so more useful). Also doesn't work for multiple PRs backported together.
doc/STYLE_GUIDE.md
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
[] seems reasonable, but why require the #PR NUMBER? That seems like noise, especially if you have the commit message in the PR description (the PR-URL is a clickable link so more useful). Also doesn't work for multiple PRs backported together.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe we better use v6.x in all the examples instead of v7.x? The latter is in the maintenance phase, there will be hardly any backports for it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
😄 just had the same idea!
fcb21b9 to
e673666
Compare
|
@gibfahn @vsemozhetbyt PTAL |
vsemozhetbyt
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
But I think this also needs to be reviewed by some collaborators that bear LTS releases.
|
@addaleax @MylesBorins You've been requesting backports, PTAL?... |
* also update STYLE_GUIDE comment about Em dashes PR-URL: nodejs#13749 Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
e673666 to
e3ea0fc
Compare
* also update STYLE_GUIDE comment about Em dashes PR-URL: #13749 Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>
* also update STYLE_GUIDE comment about Em dashes PR-URL: #13749 Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Vse Mozhet Byt <vsemozhetbyt@gmail.com>


Checklist
make -j4 test(UNIX), orvcbuild test(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
doc