Skip to content

[DOC] Improve readability of modelgen examples 2. #1902

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Mar 22, 2017
Merged

Conversation

tsalo
Copy link
Member

@tsalo tsalo commented Mar 22, 2017

No description provided.

tsalo added 3 commits March 16, 2017 08:53
Also, add blank lines between consecutive if/else statements for
clarity and restructure several description fields.

The changes to FIX seem to be automatic, but they just remove trailing
whitespace, so I decided to keep them.
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Mar 22, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #1902 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 84.21%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1902   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.92%   72.92%           
=======================================
  Files        1061     1061           
  Lines       53749    53749           
  Branches     7728     7728           
=======================================
  Hits        39194    39194           
  Misses      13341    13341           
  Partials     1214     1214
Flag Coverage Δ
#smoketests 72.92% <84.21%> (ø) ⬆️
#unittests 70.36% <78.94%> (ø) ⬆️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
nipype/interfaces/fsl/fix.py 63.79% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
nipype/algorithms/modelgen.py 73.36% <72.72%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cf2b1f8...f20b07f. Read the comment docs.

@satra
Copy link
Member

satra commented Mar 22, 2017

much better.

@satra satra merged commit 05ad4a1 into nipy:master Mar 22, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants