-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
✨ update CRD if already present #696
✨ update CRD if already present #696
Conversation
Welcome @pires! |
Hi @pires. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
a4fcb71
to
8848476
Compare
@pires: Cannot trigger testing until a trusted user reviews the PR and leaves an In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
8848476
to
913d6ed
Compare
913d6ed
to
6848bd2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
add a log line to this warning about it (and switch the title to say "update CRD if already present" to make it more likely that people'll notice it in the release notes), then I think we're good here. I think it'd be fine even without, but better to provide feedback than give someone a debugging headache. |
6848bd2
to
25548b5
Compare
Done, PTAL. |
did the test change disappear? I seem to recall that there was a change to the existing test here before... otherwise lgtm |
Rebased Added tests:
|
25548b5
to
8b11cd9
Compare
As is tradition around here, I forgot to include two new files and that's why I force-pushed. Need caffeine. OK, I'll need help understanding why the second test fails. I tried it in many forms and haven't been able to get it to work. Also the tests usually yield different results on my side with MacOS 1.15.x, Go 1.13.5 and kind 0.6.1. |
heh, definitely had those days. Need a lint that checks if we've had caffeine yet for the day :-P As for the test, did some poking around, and found the failure. It's another caffeine error :-P Commented inline. |
c93b37f
to
d3247ac
Compare
79c06b1
to
a0a84b7
Compare
Are we good @DirectXMan12? |
Signed-off-by: Pires <pjpires@gmail.com>
a0a84b7
to
5fc0586
Compare
/lgtm |
/approve |
/assign @DirectXMan12 looks like everything has been addressed - I reviewed the code and nothing else stands out. thanks @pires |
Added a bit more of a PR description -- in general, I prefer to see a bit of a description beyond the bugs it fixes and the title, even if it's relatively minimal. otherwise looks good :-) /lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: DirectXMan12, gerred, pires The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Also, since this is a bit of a behavioral change, I've made it a feature instead of a bugfix, just to play it safe |
/retest |
🏃 Download git-lfs directly on OSX
In testenv, update the CRD if it's already present on the cluster instead of failing to continue.
Fixes #342
Closes #457