Skip to content

Conversation

@jloisel
Copy link
Owner

@jloisel jloisel commented May 25, 2014

No description provided.

akarnokd and others added 30 commits April 24, 2014 16:12
…to merge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…nto merge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…to merge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…rge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…Java into merge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…erge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
…rge-prs

Conflicts:
	rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/Observable.java
... oxymoronic commit here ... adding some safety to unsafeSubscribe.
... fixes #1090
…andling

Handle Thrown Errors with UnsafeSubscribe
Somehow this got lost in the refactorings over the past few weeks.
…-onCreate

Restore ObservableExecutionHook.onCreate
benjchristensen and others added 28 commits May 20, 2014 10:47
- Fixes #1116
- These should never have been added, the subscribeOn operator already provides this functionality
Remove Ambiguous Subscribe Overloads with Scheduler
- as per Java 8 Stream naming conventions in discussion #678
As per discussion at #678

Code like this is now supported:

```java
Observable.from(1, 2, 3).forEach(System.out::println);
Observable.from(1, 2, 3).toBlocking().forEach(System.out::println);
```
Adopt Limit and ForEach Java 8 Naming Conventions
also some improvements to javadocs for share()
…ervable

Deprecate toBlockingObservable in favor of toBlocking
CompositeSubscription with atomic field updater
Performance increase from 7.7m to 8.8m ops/second

Before:

Benchmark                              (size)   Mode   Samples         Mean   Mean error    Units
r.u.PerfTransforms.mapTransformation        1  thrpt         5  7714453.187   362218.633    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.mapTransformation        1  thrpt         5  7527144.767   497816.471    ops/s

After:

Benchmark                              (size)   Mode   Samples         Mean   Mean error    Units
r.u.PerfTransforms.mapTransformation        1  thrpt         5  8853534.333   183494.242    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.mapTransformation        1  thrpt         5  8806958.403   452595.219    ops/s
Remove Subscription Wrapper from Observable.subscribe
For code like `Observable.from(1)` Improve performance from ~3.9m to 4.5+m ops/second

Before;

```
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom        1  thrpt         5  3923845.687    46657.660    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom     1024  thrpt         5     8924.953     1983.161    ops/s

r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom        1  thrpt         5  3623228.857   490894.492    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom     1024  thrpt         5     9176.330      923.929    ops/s
```

After:

```
Benchmark                                       (size)   Mode   Samples         Mean   Mean error    Units
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom        1  thrpt         5  4052364.587   100971.234    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom     1024  thrpt         5    11682.783      496.656    ops/s

Benchmark                                       (size)   Mode   Samples         Mean   Mean error    Units
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom        1  thrpt         5  4700583.987    77742.037    ops/s
r.u.PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom     1024  thrpt         5    12588.803       58.935    ops/s
```

Using this test:

```
../gradlew benchmarks '-Pjmh=-f 1 -tu s -bm thrpt -wi 5 -i 5 -r 5 -prof GC .*PerfTransforms.flatMapTransformsUsingFrom*'
```
Observable.from(T) using Observable.just(T)
Update docs for "apply" and add an example
Fixed testConcurrentOnNextFailsValidation
jloisel added a commit that referenced this pull request May 25, 2014
@jloisel jloisel merged commit 2ddb164 into jloisel:master May 25, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants