Skip to content

Conversation

@untitaker
Copy link
Member

Fix #430

@reupen could you try this one out? I assume it will fix your problem but maybe your issue with 0.10 is something entirely else

@untitaker untitaker requested a review from mitsuhiko July 13, 2019 16:02
@untitaker untitaker requested review from HazAT and kamilogorek July 13, 2019 16:06
@untitaker
Copy link
Member Author

Adding @HazAT and @kamilogorek just so they've seen the memory issues with long-running transactions once...

@reupen
Copy link

reupen commented Jul 13, 2019

@untitaker I tried the same trace as in #430 and Sentry is not in the top 20 (or 50 for that matter). So, yes, it does fix the problem described in #430.

@untitaker
Copy link
Member Author

Trimming has been removed again because we do not know what to do with trimmed data. Instead the only change here is that un-sampled transactions don't build a list of spans.

@untitaker untitaker merged commit 520158d into master Jul 15, 2019
@untitaker untitaker deleted the fix/tracing-memory-usage branch July 15, 2019 15:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Accumulating memory usage with 0.10.x

4 participants