Skip to content

Conversation

yoichi
Copy link
Contributor

@yoichi yoichi commented May 9, 2017

FluentHandler does receive buffer_overflow_handler, and its value
should be a callable.
Since logging.Handler example already has handler module in the scope,
it will construct FluentHandler with meaningless buffer overflow
handler (TypeError is raised and ignored).
This change renames the example handler and cause NameError if there
is no handler definition.

FluentHandler does receive buffer_overflow_handler, and its value
should be a callable.
Since logging.Handler example already has handler module in the scope,
it will construct FluentHandler with meaningless buffer overflow
handler (TypeError is raised and ignored).
This change renames the example handler and cause NameError if there
is no handler definition.
@repeatedly
Copy link
Member

Sorry for the delay.
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants