Skip to content

Conversation

lightclient
Copy link
Member

Alternative to #32747.

This requires less repeated code.

Copy link
Member

@MariusVanDerWijden MariusVanDerWijden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, I think I like this better than the other approach
I do not like this new requirement on the timestamp though. In the beginning of the engine api, we thought of versions different from forks, now it seems like we introduce both notions. The idea of having them be two separate things was flawed from the beginning in hindsight

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants