Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Backport 8.17] esutil: Add failure_store key to bulk response item (#948) #950

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 6, 2025

Conversation

Anaethelion
Copy link
Contributor

Backport of #948

@Anaethelion Anaethelion changed the title esutil: Add failure_store key to bulk response item (#948) [Backport 8.17] esutil: Add failure_store key to bulk response item (#948) Feb 6, 2025
@Anaethelion Anaethelion merged commit 419ddf2 into 8.17 Feb 6, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
@Anaethelion Anaethelion deleted the backport_948_to_8.17 branch February 6, 2025 13:14
Anaethelion added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
Co-authored-by: Kostiantyn Masliuk <1pkg@protonmail.com>
Anaethelion added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2025
* bump to 8.19.0

* esutil: Add failure_store key to bulk response item (#948) (#950)

Co-authored-by: Kostiantyn Masliuk <1pkg@protonmail.com>

* Bump elastictransport to 8.6.1 (#954) (#955)

* Bump elastictransport to 8.6.1

* go mod tidy

* Update internal go modules

* Update examples go modules

* Update changelog

Co-authored-by: Laurent Saint-Félix <laurent.saintfelix@elastic.co>

* Generator: exclude statically implemented params from loading

* Update API to v8.19.0 (4ac5dd1)

* Update TypedAPI to v8.19.0 (0f6f369)

* Propagate transport update

* Update skip list

---------

Co-authored-by: Kostiantyn Masliuk <1pkg@protonmail.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants