docs: ✏️ [ARTICLE] Crypto Tokens: ERC20, ERC777, ERC721, and ERC1155

[dpkreativ]

I wrote an article explaining the features of ERC20, ERC721, and ERC1155
tokens. I also added my bio details and picture.

✅ Closes: #6

[uF4No]

Hi @dpkreativ

Nice article. I think it's a good introduction for readers that are not familiar with these concepts. I just have a few small notes :

• Add a section at the beginning with the definition/difference of "fungible" and "non-fungible" so it's easier for readers to understand all the different tokens
• Add a few examples for each type of token. For example, for ERC20 you could mention USDC or UNI. Something like: "Examples of ERC20 tokens are USDC, a stablecoin pegged to the dollar, or UNI the governance token used in Uniswap to vote on changes on the platform." For ERC721, you can mention some famous collections and if they have other uses apart from just holding it, like the Developer DAO NFTs that give you access to the community, or ENS names. Also try to find some examples of ERC1155 (I found some in this article)
• Add links to the project names mentioned in ERC721A
• Add links to Twitter profiles or personal websites of the token authors like Dieter Shirley, Jacob Evans, Natassia Sachs, Witek Radomski, etc...

[dpkreativ]

Okay @uF4No
Thanks for these suggestions.
I'm on it.

[Genesis3800]

I wrote an article explaining the features of ERC20, ERC721, and ERC1155 tokens. I also added my bio details and picture.

✅ Closes: #6

Hey @dpkreativ

Great write-up.
In my experience, even good developers often lack knowledge of these different standards, and the differences between them. Your article fits in perfectly.
Antonio covered everything nicely, but In addition to @uF4No 's comments I would like to add just 2 more suggestions-

1. Maybe you could cover more token standards like ERC-777 and ERC-4626. These are standards people typically haven't heard of, and might be nice to add.
   I am myself ignorant of what 4626 does, but maybe I could learn from your article?

2. The conclusion seems a little bit short in my opinion. Is it possible that you could expand a little more on it. Maybe dive a little more into the importance of these standards in the conclusion, since you explained them in detail above.

[uF4No]

1. Maybe you could cover more token standards like ERC-777 and ERC-4626. These are standards people typically haven't heard of, and might be nice to add.
   I am myself ignorant of what 4626 does, but maybe I could learn from your article?

777 could be a nice to have, as it introduced some additional features over ERC20 that are very useful for DeFi apps. Here is some info.
No need for ERC4626, actually we already have an article specific to that in our blog 😊

2. The conclusion seems a little bit short in my opinion. Is it possible that you could expand a little more on it. Maybe dive a little more into the importance of these standards in the conclusion, since you explained them in detail above.

That'd be nice

[dpkreativ]

Thanks for the suggestions @uF4No & @Genesis3800

I'm currently updating the content!

[dpkreativ]

Hi @uF4No
I've updated the article based on the suggestions. Please check it out. Thanks 🤗

[uF4No]

All good 🙌

[dpkreativ]

Hey @uF4No any updates on this?

[uF4No]

Yes. Merged.
We'll start the process to get it published in the blog and get you paid. Let's chat on Discord 🤙

[dpkreativ]

Awesome! 🚀