Add missing fields to API Gateway request context: #93
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
added 5 commits
July 28, 2019 17:01
Contributor
|
@lucasam is this PR still relevant given that APIGatewayV2ProxyRequestEvent was added? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #, if available:
#88
#76#71#41
Description of changes:
Adds to ProxyRequestContext missing fields from normal API Gateway calls. Plus fields related to Websockets.
Field Names:
* connectionId* routeKey* messageId* eventType* messageDirection* connectedAtWebsocket related fields were adressed at #92
By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.