-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 698
ELECFREAKS Pico:ed have a display but also Alligator Clip #1028
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Should we consider a 7x17 LED matrix to be a display? I believe only LCD or OLED display should be tagged as having a display. However I added the Alligator Clip friendly as it looks like a Micro:bit.
|
I think @deshipu would say that LED matrices are displays. They are low-resolution, but they can be used for gaming and scrolling text display. |
|
One could say that the 5x5 from Micro:bit is a display... so it is hard to put a limit. My idea was that OLED or LCDs are screen, and a bunch of LEDs is not. I did see the pewpew from @deshipu and I did not react the same way as for Pico:ed or the two mixgo_ce_* so I am obviously biased, maybe the joystic presence made it clear to me that this was a "screen". Maybe for display it is not such a big deal, if it is visible in the picture, and not the kind of display the user expect, it will be discarded. For other feature, if a board pretending to have Wifi, but wifi that is not supported by CircuitPython... then I would prefer to have that feature not tagged for that board (and it is the case for the only offender I know off, the Wio Terminal). If we decide this board has a screen, then I still need to add the "Solder-Free Alligator Clip" but it can be another PR. |
Generally that's true. We should probably add the display feature to the micro:bit as well. A lot of the example code uses that as one, albeit an extremely low resolution display. Because one of our goals was to keep the feature list to a minimum, I think we should err on the side of calling a bunch of LEDs arranged in a matrix a display rather than create a new category. The way I think about it is if somebody is filtering for boards with displays for some project and they saw a few with LEDs would they be okay with having that as an option? |
Feel free to discard/close the PR not matching that or maybe let's put the question as "In the Weed" and wait for a decision there. |
|
I'd like to think about this some more before closing or merging. |
By discussion on the 20220829 meeting, this is also a display... however I keep the PR for the Aligator Clip
|
For the terms, let's go with: "External Display Connector "could be added to the bare metal Raspberry Pi SBCs and similar boards as well. |
|
Keeping the PR open for the Aligator Clip feature that was missing, but not removing the Display as discussion on 20220829 decided those LED matrix are small display. |
|
I'll create a new issue for the Display name thing. |
|
Actually, I'll use #1032. |
|
@makermelissa If you could review this change, that "ELECFREAKS Pico:ed" has a "Display" but is missing Alligator Clip feature until merged. |
makermelissa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh right, looks good.
Should we consider a 7x17 LED matrix to be a display?
I believe only LCD or OLED display should be tagged as having a display.
However I added the Alligator Clip friendly as it looks like a Micro:bit.