Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

2.x: Remove some dead code #4581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2016
Merged

2.x: Remove some dead code #4581

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 22, 2016

Conversation

vanniktech
Copy link
Collaborator

Also what about IntFunction it's right now in the public API however not used. So the question is does Rx want to expose that interface?

Copy link
Member

@akarnokd akarnokd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
@Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
@Documented
@Target({ElementType.METHOD, ElementType.TYPE})
@SuppressWarnings("unused") // Part of Public API.
public @interface SchedulerSupport {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess IntelliJ complains about this? Now Eclipse will.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well IO & NEW_THREAD are unused since they are not used internally. However they're part of the public API so I suppressed that warning that they're not used. Why will Eclipse complain about this one?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because it doesn't see anything, like a private method that is not in use.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh that's really bad. You want me to remove this one or leave it as is?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove this.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

@akarnokd akarnokd added this to the 2.0 RC 3 milestone Sep 22, 2016
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Sep 22, 2016

Current coverage is 78.01% (diff: 100%)

Merging #4581 into 2.x will decrease coverage by <.01%

@@                2.x      #4581   diff @@
==========================================
  Files           552        552          
  Lines         36164      36156     -8   
  Methods           0          0          
  Messages          0          0          
  Branches       5575       5574     -1   
==========================================
- Hits          28215      28208     -7   
+ Misses         5934       5929     -5   
- Partials       2015       2019     +4   

Powered by Codecov. Last update a5a4729...fd62a9e

@akarnokd akarnokd merged commit 115a095 into ReactiveX:2.x Sep 22, 2016
@vanniktech vanniktech deleted the 2.x_cleanup branch September 22, 2016 17:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants