Skip to content

Simplify usage of Content/Blob's base64-encoded data. #209

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 20, 2023

Conversation

maleadt
Copy link
Collaborator

@maleadt maleadt commented Dec 5, 2022

Currently, the .contents field only contains base64-encoded data, which isn't very useful.

@maleadt maleadt force-pushed the tb/decoded_content branch from 8d429f4 to e147c33 Compare December 5, 2022 09:13
@maleadt maleadt force-pushed the tb/decoded_content branch from c8d7305 to 456eb1b Compare December 5, 2022 09:37
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 5, 2022

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 56.69%. Comparing base (fcf068f) to head (456eb1b).
Report is 9 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #209      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   56.39%   56.69%   +0.30%     
==========================================
  Files          37       37              
  Lines         860      866       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits          485      491       +6     
  Misses        375      375              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@maleadt maleadt changed the title Add a convenience function to access a Content object's actual contents. Simplify usage of Content/Blob's base64-encoded data. Dec 5, 2022
@maleadt maleadt merged commit ec83ea9 into master Feb 20, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants