Feat(bcakend) more detail ux structure #62
Conversation
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> ## Summary by CodeRabbit ## Release Notes - **New Features** - Introduced a new template for React applications using TypeScript and Vite, including essential setup files. - Added a main HTML entry point for the application. - Configured ESLint for improved code quality and best practices in TypeScript and React environments. - **Documentation** - Added a README file outlining setup instructions and recommended configurations for the template. - **Configuration** - New TypeScript and Vite configuration files created to optimize the development environment. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 eslint
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.tsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 ESLint couldn't find the plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier". (The package "eslint-plugin-prettier" was not found when loaded as a Node module from the directory "/backend".) It's likely that the plugin isn't installed correctly. Try reinstalling by running the following: The plugin "eslint-plugin-prettier" was referenced from the config file in "backend/.eslintrc.js". If you still can't figure out the problem, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/prompt.ts (2)
Line range hint
2-6: Fix typo in method name: "Structre" should be "Structure"The method name contains a typo:
generateUXSiteMapStructrePromptshould begenerateUXSiteMapStructurePrompt.- generateUXSiteMapStructrePrompt: ( + generateUXSiteMapStructurePrompt: (
Line range hint
7-58: Improve prompt readability and consistencyThe prompt content has several areas for improvement:
- Grammatical errors (e.g., "analyzing" should be "analyze" in rule 1)
- Inconsistent formatting (mixing numbered lists with different formats: "1," vs "1.")
- Redundant content between sections 4 and 6
Consider consolidating the redundant sections and applying these fixes:
- 1, Your job is to analyzing how the ui element should be layed out + 1. Your job is to analyze how the UI elements should be laid out - 2, You need to ensure all features + 2. Ensure all features - 3, You need to identify + 3. IdentifyAlso consider merging sections 4 and 6 since they cover similar points about page structure and content.
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts (3)
73-74: Usecontext.modelinstead ofModelProvider.getInstance()for consistencyTo maintain consistency with the existing codebase, consider using
context.modelinstead of directly accessingModelProvider.getInstance().Apply this diff to align with the existing pattern:
- const modelProvider = ModelProvider.getInstance(); + const modelProvider = context.model;
101-101: Avoid logging potentially large documents to prevent performance issuesLogging the entire
refinedDocumentmay lead to performance issues and cluttered logs if the document is large. Consider removing this log statement or logging a summary instead.Apply this diff to modify the log statement:
- this.logger.log(refinedDocument); + this.logger.log('Level 2 UX Sitemap Structure Document generated successfully.');
22-22: Address the TODO commentsThere are TODO comments indicating that certain values need to be updated.
- Line 22:
// TODO: change later- Line 81:
// TODO: Replace with dynamic platform if necessaryWould you like assistance in implementing these changes or opening a GitHub issue to track these tasks?
Also applies to: 81-81
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.ts(0 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/prompt.ts(2 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- backend/src/build-system/node/frontend-file-structure/index.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
backend/src/build-system/node/ux-sitemap-structure/index.ts
[error] 121-121: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
| return `You are an expert UX Designer. | ||
| Your task is to analyze and improve a specific part of a page in the provided UX Structure Document. | ||
| The goal is to refine the design, layout, and interaction to ensure a seamless user experience and facilitate frontend implementation. | ||
| The output should address all aspects of user interaction, content layout, based on the following inputs: | ||
|
|
||
| - Project name: ${projectName} | ||
| - Sitemap Documentation: ${sitemapDoc} | ||
| - UX Structure document: ${UXStructure} | ||
| - Platform: ${platform} | ||
|
|
||
| Follow these guidelines to analyze requirements from a UX perspective: | ||
|
|
||
| ### Instructions and Rules: | ||
|
|
||
| 1, Analyze the Target Section: | ||
| Focus on the specific part of the page provided in the UX Structure document. | ||
| Identify ways to enhance its layout, interactions, and functionality. | ||
| 2, Improve UX Details: | ||
| Add clarity to component placement and hierarchy. | ||
| Specify interactions, behaviors, and dynamic content updates. | ||
| Ensure the section aligns with user goals and their journey. | ||
| 3, You need to identify and define every page/screen required for the application. | ||
| 4, Detailed Breakdown for Each Page/Screen: | ||
| Page Purpose: Clearly state the user goal for the page. | ||
| Core Elements: | ||
| List all components (e.g., headers, buttons, sidebars) and explain their role on the page. | ||
| Include specific interactions and behaviors for each element. | ||
| Content Display: | ||
| Identify the information that needs to be visible on the page and why it’s essential for the user. | ||
| Navigation and Routes: | ||
| Specify all frontend routes required to navigate to this page. | ||
| Include links or actions that lead to other pages or states. | ||
| Restrictions: | ||
| Note any restrictions or conditions for accessing the page (e.g., login required, specific user roles). | ||
|
|
||
| 5, Focus on Detail: | ||
| Provide a component-level breakdown for each page, including layouts. | ||
| Explain how the design supports user goals and aligns with their journey. | ||
|
|
||
| 6. For each page/screen in the sitemap: | ||
| - How the block should be place on the view? | ||
| - What information does the user need to see? | ||
| - What elements should be on the page? | ||
| - What are all the routes require for the frontend? | ||
| - What dynamic content needs to be displayed? | ||
| - What are the restriction for the page? | ||
|
|
||
| 7. Consider: | ||
| - User goals on each page | ||
| - User journy | ||
| - Element purposes | ||
| - Content that needs to be displayed | ||
|
|
||
| Your reply must start with: "\`\`\`UXStructureMap" and end with "\`\`\`". | ||
|
|
||
| Focus on describing the UX Structure from a user experience perspective. For each page: | ||
| 1. What element appear on each page and why | ||
| 2. What information needs to be displayed and why | ||
| 3. How the element supports user goals | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reduce duplication by extracting common prompt content
There's significant duplication between the two prompt templates. The only unique content is in the initial section (points 1-2). Consider extracting the common content into a shared template.
Create a shared template function:
const getCommonUXPromptTemplate = () => `
### Instructions and Rules:
4. Detailed Breakdown for Each Page/Screen:
Page Purpose: ...
[rest of common content]
`;
const prompts = {
generateUXSiteMapStructurePrompt: (projectName: string, sitemapDoc: string, platform: string): string => {
return `You are an expert UX Designer...
${getCommonUXPromptTemplate()}
`;
},
generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt: (projectName: string, UXStructure: string, sitemapDoc: string, platform: string): string => {
return `You are an expert UX Designer...
[Level 2 specific content]
${getCommonUXPromptTemplate()}
`;
}
};This will:
- Reduce code duplication
- Make maintenance easier
- Ensure consistency between prompts
| generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt: ( | ||
| projectName: string, | ||
| UXStructure: string, | ||
| sitemapDoc: string, | ||
| platform: string, | ||
| ): string => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in second method name: "Structre" should be "Structure"
The same typo appears in the second method name.
- generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt: (
+ generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt: (📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt: ( | |
| projectName: string, | |
| UXStructure: string, | |
| sitemapDoc: string, | |
| platform: string, | |
| ): string => { | |
| generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt: ( | |
| projectName: string, | |
| UXStructure: string, | |
| sitemapDoc: string, | |
| platform: string, | |
| ): string => { |
|
|
||
| // extract relevant data from the context | ||
| const projectName = | ||
| context.getData('projectName') || 'Default Project Name'; | ||
|
|
||
| const prompt = prompts.generateUXDataMapPrompt( | ||
| const prompt = prompts.generateUXSiteMapStructrePrompt( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Correct the typo in method names: 'Structre' should be 'Structure'
The method names generateUXSiteMapStructrePrompt and generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt contain a typo. "Structre" should be "Structure". Please correct the method names to prevent any potential issues.
Apply this diff to fix the method names:
// At line 19
- const prompt = prompts.generateUXSiteMapStructrePrompt(
+ const prompt = prompts.generateUXSiteMapStructurePrompt(
// At line 77
- const prompt = prompts.generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructrePrompt(
+ const prompt = prompts.generateLevel2UXSiteMapStructurePrompt(Also applies to: 77-77
| while ((match = regex.exec(text)) !== null) { | ||
| const title = match[1].trim(); | ||
| const content = match[2].trim(); | ||
| sections.push({ title, content }); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor to avoid assignment within the while loop condition
Assigning within the while loop condition can lead to less readable code and is generally discouraged. Refactor the loop to improve clarity and maintainability.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
let match;
- while ((match = regex.exec(text)) !== null) {
+ match = regex.exec(text);
+ while (match !== null) {
const title = match[1].trim();
const content = match[2].trim();
sections.push({ title, content });
+ match = regex.exec(text);
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| while ((match = regex.exec(text)) !== null) { | |
| const title = match[1].trim(); | |
| const content = match[2].trim(); | |
| sections.push({ title, content }); | |
| } | |
| let match; | |
| match = regex.exec(text); | |
| while (match !== null) { | |
| const title = match[1].trim(); | |
| const content = match[2].trim(); | |
| sections.push({ title, content }); | |
| match = regex.exec(text); | |
| } |
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 121-121: The assignment should not be in an expression.
The use of assignments in expressions is confusing.
Expressions are often considered as side-effect free.
(lint/suspicious/noAssignInExpressions)
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Level2UXSitemapStructureHandlerclass for enhanced UX sitemap generation.Improvements
Bug Fixes