chore(frontend): import pino as frontend logger #178
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes update the logging mechanism across the codebase by replacing direct console logging calls with a centralized logging utility. In several backend, API, component, hook, and utility files, calls like Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)(No sequence diagrams generated as there are no new control flow modifications.) Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool’s configuration or disable the tool if it’s a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
ERR_PNPM_OPTIONAL_DEPS_REQUIRE_PROD_DEPS Optional dependencies cannot be installed without production dependencies Tip ⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (30)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (30)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (1)
1-7: 💡 Verification agent🧩 Analysis chain
Address module import error in pipeline.
The GitHub Actions pipeline is failing because the 'codefox-common' module cannot be found.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if codefox-common package exists in node_modules if [ -d "backend/node_modules/codefox-common" ]; then echo "codefox-common is installed in node_modules" else echo "codefox-common is NOT installed in node_modules" fi # Check if it's defined as a dependency in package.json grep -rn "codefox-common" backend/package.json || echo "codefox-common not found in package.json"Length of output: 240
Module Import Error Due to Workspace Dependency Setup
The pipeline error stems from the module resolution for the workspace dependency "codefox-common". Although it's correctly declared in the backend’s package.json with
"workspace:*", the package isn’t being linked into the backend's node_modules as expected. Please review the workspace configuration and the CI pipeline’s install commands to ensure that workspace dependencies are correctly bootstrapped.
- Confirm that your package manager (e.g., Yarn or PNPM) is set up to install workspace packages.
- Adjust your GitHub Actions pipeline to run the appropriate install commands that support workspace linking.
- If "codefox-common" is intended to be an external dependency rather than a workspace-internal package, update its version accordingly.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and upload coverage
[error] 4-4: TS2307: Cannot find module 'codefox-common' or its corresponding type declarations.
🧹 Nitpick comments (10)
frontend/src/hooks/useModels.ts (1)
56-56: Consider using the appropriate log level for data.While this change moves away from console logging to a structured logger, consider whether
infois the appropriate level for this particular log. If this is purely for debugging during development, you might want to uselogger.debug()instead.frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx (1)
14-14: Use absolute imports for consistency.Other files in this PR use the
@/app/log/loggerabsolute import path. For consistency, consider using the same import pattern here.-import { logger } from '../log/logger'; +import { logger } from '@/app/log/logger';frontend/src/components/file-sidebar.tsx (1)
35-35: Consider adding context to log statement or removing if it's a debugging artifact.This log statement outputs three boolean values without context labels, making it difficult to interpret in logs. If this is meant for production, consider adding descriptive labels.
- logger.info(`${isCollapsed}, ${isMobile}, ${isSimple}`); + logger.info({ isCollapsed, isMobile, isSimple }, 'Sidebar state');If this was added for debugging purposes only, consider removing it before merging to production.
frontend/src/app/log/logger.ts (1)
1-19: LGTM: Well-configured logger utility.The Pino logger is properly configured with appropriate formatting options and transport settings.
Consider these improvements for enhanced production readiness:
- Add environment-based configuration to adjust log levels (e.g., 'info' in production, 'debug' in development)
- Add documentation comments explaining the logger configuration choices
import pino from 'pino'; +/** + * Application logger configured with Pino + * - Uses 'info' level in production, 'debug' in development + * - Formats logs with pino-pretty in development + * - Excludes unnecessary fields like pid and hostname + */ export const logger = pino({ - level: 'info', + level: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? 'info' : 'debug', timestamp: () => `,"time":"${new Date().toISOString()}"`, formatters: { level(label) { return { level: label.toUpperCase() }; }, }, transport: { + // Pretty printing is typically only needed in development + target: process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production' ? undefined : 'pino-pretty', - target: 'pino-pretty', options: { colorize: true, translateTime: 'yyyy-mm-dd HH:MM:ss', ignore: 'pid,hostname', }, }, });frontend/src/components/root/expand-card.tsx (1)
124-124: Consider removing unnecessary logging.This appears to be debugging information about the project image. If it's not needed for production, consider removing this log statement entirely rather than converting it to logger.info.
-logger.info(project.image);backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts (1)
107-107: Consistency in commented code.While this change maintains consistency by updating the commented-out logging statement, there's no functional impact since it's commented out. Consider either uncommenting it if the logging is useful or removing it entirely if it's not needed.
-// logger.warn(`Failed to read file: ${filePath}, attempt #${attempt}`); +// Uncomment if you want to log retry attemptsfrontend/src/components/pull-model-form.tsx (1)
139-139: Consider removing debug logThis appears to be a debug log statement that may not be necessary in production code. Consider removing this or making it more descriptive if it's intended to stay.
- logger.info('enter model');If it's meant to stay for debugging purposes, consider making it more descriptive:
- logger.info('enter model'); + logger.info('Initializing model pull form');frontend/src/hooks/useChatStream.ts (1)
131-131: Consider using logger.error instead of logger.info for error logging.While this successfully replaces console.log with the logger, error information should typically be logged using logger.error rather than logger.info to maintain correct log levels.
- logger.info(error); + logger.error(error);frontend/src/app/api/runProject/route.ts (1)
15-15: Note relative import path.The logger is imported using a relative path (
../../log/logger) instead of the module alias path (@/app/log/logger) used in other files. While this works, consider standardizing import paths for consistency.-import { logger } from '../../log/logger'; +import { logger } from '@/app/log/logger';frontend/src/utils/file-reader.ts (1)
81-98: Consider updating file parsing logic.The current implementation in
updateFile()attempts to parse the file content as JSON (line 91) which would fail for non-JSON files. Since this is a file reader/writer utility that might handle various file types, consider adding a check for content type or handling both JSON and raw text.public async updateFile(filePath: string, newContent: string): Promise<void> { if (filePath.includes('..')) { logger.error('[FileReader] Invalid file path detected:', filePath); throw new Error('Invalid file path'); } const fullPath = path.join(this.basePath, filePath); logger.info(`📝 [FileReader] Updating file: ${fullPath}`); try { - const content = JSON.parse(newContent); - await fs.writeFile(fullPath, content, 'utf-8'); + // Determine if the content is JSON or plain text + let content = newContent; + try { + // If it's valid JSON, parse it to ensure it's correctly formatted + JSON.parse(newContent); + // For JSON files, we might want to format it + // content = JSON.stringify(JSON.parse(newContent), null, 2); + } catch { + // If it's not valid JSON, treat it as plain text + } + await fs.writeFile(fullPath, content, 'utf-8'); logger.info('[FileReader] File updated successfully'); } catch (err) { logger.error(`[FileReader] Error updating file: ${fullPath}`, err); throw new Error(`Failed to update file: ${fullPath}`); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (32)
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts(1 hunks)frontend/container-state.json(1 hunks)frontend/next.config.mjs(1 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)frontend/port-state.json(1 hunks)frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/app/api/file/route.ts(2 hunks)frontend/src/app/api/media/[...path]/route.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/app/api/runProject/route.ts(14 hunks)frontend/src/app/api/screenshot/route.ts(5 hunks)frontend/src/app/log/logger.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/avatar-uploader.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/code-engine.tsx(6 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/project-context.tsx(20 hunks)frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/web-view.tsx(7 hunks)frontend/src/components/file-sidebar.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/image-embedder.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/pull-model-form.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/root/expand-card.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/root/nav.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/root/prompt-form.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/sidebar-item.tsx(3 hunks)frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/sign-in-modal.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/components/sign-up-modal.tsx(2 hunks)frontend/src/hooks/useChatStream.ts(4 hunks)frontend/src/hooks/useModels.ts(2 hunks)frontend/src/hooks/useProjectStatusMonitor.ts(2 hunks)frontend/src/hooks/useSpeechRecognition.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/lib/client.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/providers/AuthProvider.tsx(6 hunks)frontend/src/utils/file-reader.ts(4 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Actions: Run tests and upload coverage
backend/src/build-system/utils/files.ts
[error] 4-4: TS2307: Cannot find module 'codefox-common' or its corresponding type declarations.
🔇 Additional comments (57)
frontend/container-state.json (1)
1-2: Clarify the purpose of this new file in the context of logging changesThis file adds an empty JSON object structure. While the JSON is valid, could you explain how this empty state file relates to the logging implementation that's the focus of this PR?
frontend/port-state.json (1)
1-2: Clarify the purpose of this new state fileThis file adds an empty JSON array. Similar to
container-state.json, it's not immediately clear how this relates to the Pino logging implementation. Could you explain the purpose of these state files and why they're being added as part of this logging PR?frontend/next.config.mjs (1)
5-7: Server component configuration for Pino looks goodThe addition of Pino and pino-pretty to the
serverComponentsExternalPackagesarray is appropriate for making these packages available to server components in Next.js.frontend/package.json (1)
55-56:❌ Incorrect review comment
Verify Pino version compatibility
The added dependencies look appropriate for implementing structured logging, but I noticed the Pino version is specified as
^9.6.0. According to the official Pino documentation, the current stable version is 8.x. Version 9.6.0 doesn't appear to exist in the npm registry.
🌐 Web query:
What is the latest stable version of pino npm package?💡 Result:
The latest stable version of the pino npm package is v9.6.0, released on December 23, 2024[1][2][12]. This version includes several updates such as:
- Dependency upgrades (TypeScript 5.6.3 → 5.7.2)[1]
- New
streamWritehook for custom stream handling[1]- Expanded documentation for transports and GCP logging formatters[1]
Key facts about Pino's version status:
- Not deprecated[2]
- Actively maintained with recent updates to support Node.js v22 in CI testing[1]
- Follows semantic versioning with regular releases (9.x being the current major version)[7][12]
For production use, Pino v9.6.0 remains the recommended choice as of March 2025, with no critical issues reported in the latest release cycle[1][2][12]. Developers should monitor the official GitHub releases for future updates.
Citations:
- 1: https://github.com/pinojs/pino/releases
- 2: https://www.xeol.io/explorer/package/npm/pino
- 3: https://cloudsmith.com/navigator/npm/@types/pino
- 4: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pino/v/2.1.4?activeTab=versions
- 5: https://betterstack.com/community/guides/logging/how-to-install-setup-and-use-pino-to-log-node-js-applications/
- 6: https://github.com/pinojs/pino-clf
- 7: https://npm.io/package/pino
- 8: https://github.com/pinojs/pino-http/releases
- 9: https://endoflife.date/nodejs
- 10: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pino/v/1.0.3?activeTab=versions
- 11: https://www.npmjs.com/package/nestjs-pino
- 12: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pino
- 13: https://forum.serverless.com/t/packaging-pino-throws-an-error-at-runtime/20923
- 14: https://www.npmjs.com/pino-debug
- 15: https://www.npmjs.com/package/pino-pretty
- 16: https://github.com/pinojs/pino/blob/main/package.json
- 17: https://socket.dev/npm/package/pino
- 18: https://socket.dev/npm/package/hono-pino
Pino version validation complete
After verification, Pino version ^9.6.0 is confirmed as the latest stable release (released December 23, 2024) and is fully supported for production use. The earlier concern regarding version 9.6.0 not existing in the npm registry is incorrect. No changes are needed for the dependency in
frontend/package.json.Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.
frontend/src/hooks/useModels.ts (1)
7-7: LGTM! Import for logger utility.The addition of the logger import is a good step toward standardizing logging practices across the codebase.
frontend/src/hooks/useProjectStatusMonitor.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM! Import for logger utility.The addition of the logger import is a good step toward standardizing logging practices across the codebase.
54-54: LGTM! Proper error logging implementation.This is a good example of using the correct log level (
error) for error conditions, which maintains the semantic meaning of the log message.frontend/src/app/(main)/page.tsx (1)
36-36: LGTM! Proper error logging implementation.Good use of
logger.error()for logging an error condition with appropriate context.frontend/src/components/root/nav.tsx (2)
18-18: LGTM! Import for logger utility.The addition of the logger import is a good step toward standardizing logging practices across the codebase.
89-89: LGTM! Proper error logging implementation.Good replacement of
console.errorwithlogger.error, maintaining the semantic meaning of the log message.frontend/src/components/root/prompt-form.tsx (2)
33-33: LGTM: Appropriate logger import.The logger import is correctly added to replace console logging with structured logging.
90-90: LGTM: Proper replacement of console.error with logger.error.This change appropriately implements structured logging for error handling in the regenerateDescriptionMutation hook.
frontend/src/components/image-embedder.tsx (2)
7-7: LGTM: Appropriate logger import.The logger import is correctly added to replace console logging with structured logging.
35-35: LGTM: Proper replacement of console.error with logger.error.This change appropriately implements structured logging for error handling in the image conversion process.
frontend/src/components/file-sidebar.tsx (1)
21-21: LGTM: Appropriate logger import.The logger import is correctly added to replace console logging with structured logging.
frontend/src/components/sidebar-item.tsx (3)
25-25: Good standard logging implementation.Import of the central logger utility aligns with the PR objective of standardizing logging throughout the codebase.
58-60: Consistent error handling improvement.Replacing console.error with logger.error is a good change that provides more structured logging and aligns with the logging standardization.
72-74: Appropriate error logging implementation.This change ensures consistent error reporting across the error handling paths within the component.
frontend/src/hooks/useSpeechRecognition.ts (3)
1-1: Good import addition.Correctly imports the logger utility at the top of the file.
16-18: Appropriate error logging for unsupported API.Replaces console.error with the standardized logger, which helps with consistent error tracking and monitoring.
47-49: Consistent error handling for speech recognition errors.Using the logger utility for speech recognition errors will improve error tracking and debugging.
frontend/src/components/root/expand-card.tsx (2)
8-8: Good import addition.Correctly imports the logger utility.
45-47: Improved error logging for fetch operations.Using structured logging for API errors improves traceability and debugging.
frontend/src/components/sidebar.tsx (2)
27-27: Good addition: Logger import implementedThe logger import has been correctly added to replace console logging.
110-110: Console.error correctly replaced with logger.errorThe error logging has been standardized using the structured logger utility, which is consistent with the PR objective.
frontend/src/components/avatar-uploader.tsx (2)
10-10: Logger import properly implementedThe logger import has been correctly added to standardize logging throughout the component.
100-100: Error logging standardized with logger utilityThe error logging for avatar upload failures has been properly updated to use the structured logger, maintaining the same error information while improving log standardization.
frontend/src/components/pull-model-form.tsx (2)
19-19: Logger import correctly addedThe logger import has been properly implemented for standardizing logging.
127-127: Error logging standardized with logger utilityThe error handling during model pulling has been properly updated to use the structured logger.
frontend/src/components/sign-in-modal.tsx (2)
27-27: Logger import properly implementedThe logger import has been correctly added to standardize logging.
73-73: Login error logging standardizedThe login error handling has been properly updated to use the structured logger, consistent with the PR objective.
frontend/src/hooks/useChatStream.ts (3)
7-7: Successfully added logger import.The import of the Pino logger is correctly positioned in the import statements.
75-75: Good replacement of console.log with logger.info.This change maintains the same logging functionality while using the standardized logger.
145-145: Successfully replaced console.log with logger.info.This ensures proper logging of the input object.
frontend/src/components/sign-up-modal.tsx (2)
29-29: Successfully added logger import.The import of the Pino logger is correctly positioned in the import statements.
80-80: Good replacement of console.error with logger.error.This change correctly uses logger.error for error conditions, maintaining the appropriate log level.
frontend/src/app/api/media/[...path]/route.ts (3)
5-5: Successfully added logger import.The import of the Pino logger is correctly positioned in the import statements.
17-17: Good replacement of console.error with logger.error for security logging.Using the structured logger for security-related issues like directory traversal is a good practice and maintains the appropriate log level.
57-57: Good replacement of console.error with logger.error.This change correctly uses logger.error for error conditions, maintaining the appropriate log level.
frontend/src/providers/AuthProvider.tsx (3)
16-16: Successfully added logger import.The import of the Pino logger is correctly positioned in the import statements.
69-69: Good replacement of console.error with logger.error for authentication issues.These changes correctly use logger.error for authentication-related error conditions, maintaining the appropriate log level.
Also applies to: 83-83, 118-118
131-131: Good replacement of console.log with logger.info.These changes correctly use logger.info for informational messages about the authentication flow.
Also applies to: 153-153
frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/code-engine.tsx (2)
12-12: Great addition of the centralized logger.Adding a centralized logging utility improves the consistency and maintainability of the codebase.
53-53: Good replacement of console statements with logger.You've consistently replaced all console logging calls with their appropriate logger equivalents (error, warn, info). This standardization helps with:
- Consistent log formatting
- Potential log level filtering
- Better log aggregation and analysis
Also applies to: 91-91, 94-94, 140-140, 211-211, 273-273
frontend/src/lib/client.ts (2)
16-16: Good addition of the logger import.Adding the centralized logger to the Apollo client setup is appropriate.
46-54: Excellent standardization of GraphQL logging.The replacement of console logs with structured logging in the Apollo client middleware is valuable for debugging GraphQL requests, responses, and errors. This change will make troubleshooting API issues much easier.
Also applies to: 79-85
frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/project-context.tsx (2)
24-24: Good addition of the logger import.Adding the centralized logger to this complex component is appropriate.
83-89: Well-implemented logging standardization in a complex component.You've appropriately replaced all console logging statements with the proper logger methods (info, error, warn, debug) throughout this context provider. This is particularly beneficial in a complex component with many error handling and state management scenarios.
The appropriate use of different log levels (debug for polling, warn for background tasks, error for exceptions) shows good logging practices.
Also applies to: 205-205, 335-335, 350-350, 378-378, 395-395, 625-625, 634-634, 677-677, 729-729, 757-757, 788-788, 828-828, 857-864, 871-874
frontend/src/components/chat/code-engine/web-view.tsx (2)
15-15: Good addition of the logger import.Adding the centralized logger to the web view component is appropriate.
60-68: Well-implemented logging for service monitoring.The replacement of console statements with structured logging is particularly useful in this component which monitors service availability and readiness. The improved logging will help track initialization progress and diagnose preview loading issues more effectively.
Also applies to: 87-88, 98-99, 119-120, 128-130, 198-199, 205-206
frontend/src/app/api/file/route.ts (2)
6-6: Good addition of logging utility.The import of a centralized logger is a positive change that will help standardize logging throughout the application.
9-9: Good replacement of console calls with structured logger.Replacing console.log/error with logger.info/error is a good practice that provides more consistent logging and better integration with monitoring tools. The log messages maintain their descriptive nature while benefiting from the structured logging capabilities of Pino.
Also applies to: 15-15, 24-24, 30-30
frontend/src/app/api/screenshot/route.ts (2)
1-1: Good import placement.Proper import of the logger utility at the top of the file, following best practices.
11-11: Good standardization of logging.Systematically replaced all console logging statements with the structured logger throughout the puppeteer browser handling code. This ensures consistent logging for browser instance management and error handling.
Also applies to: 71-71, 78-78, 94-94, 108-108
frontend/src/app/api/runProject/route.ts (1)
101-103: Thorough logging implementation.All logging statements have been consistently replaced throughout this complex Docker container management code. This is a valuable improvement that will help with debugging and monitoring container operations in production.
The log messages maintain their descriptive nature and contextual information while benefiting from structured logging capabilities.
Also applies to: 105-105, 138-138, 261-261, 266-268, 275-275, 277-277, 297-297, 300-300, 303-303, 356-356, 358-358, 380-382, 427-427, 452-454, 457-457, 469-469, 483-485, 533-535, 558-558
frontend/src/utils/file-reader.ts (2)
4-4: Good addition of logging utility.The import of a centralized logger is a positive change that will help standardize logging throughout the FileReader utility.
37-37: Well-implemented logging standardization.All console logging statements have been systematically replaced with the appropriate logger methods across the FileReader class. This maintains the context and meaning of the original log messages while providing the benefits of structured logging.
Also applies to: 60-60, 76-76, 83-83, 88-88, 94-94, 96-96
| if (data?.getAvailableModelTags) { | ||
| updateCache(data.getAvailableModelTags); | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| if (error) { | ||
| console.log(error); | ||
| logger.info(error); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Use logger.error() for error conditions.
Since this is logging an error condition, it would be more semantically correct to use logger.error() rather than logger.info().
- logger.info(error);
+ logger.error(error);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| logger.info(error); | |
| logger.error(error); |
Sma1lboy
changed the title
<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> - **New Features** - Introduced a centralized logging utility across the application to improve error reporting and operational monitoring. - **Chores** - Updated configuration settings with experimental support for external packages. - Added new dependencies that enhance log readability and performance. These changes streamline logging and error tracking without altering core functionalities. <!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai --> --------- Co-authored-by: Sma1lboy <541898146chen@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: autofix-ci[bot] <114827586+autofix-ci[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores
These changes streamline logging and error tracking without altering core functionalities.