Merge pull request #75359 from hborla/unavailable-sendable-restated

[Concurrency] Don't warn about re-stating inherited unavailable conformances to `Sendable`.

Author: hborla

Diff for: lib/Sema/TypeCheckConcurrency.cpp

@@ -6219,7 +6219,11 @@ bool swift::checkSendableConformance(
     return false;
 
   // If this is an always-unavailable conformance, there's nothing to check.
-  if (auto ext = dyn_cast<ExtensionDecl>(conformanceDC)) {
+  // We always use the root conformance for this check, because inherited
+  // conformances need to walk back to the original declaration for the
+  // superclass conformance to find an unavailable attribute.
+  if (auto ext = dyn_cast<ExtensionDecl>(
+          conformance->getRootConformance()->getDeclContext())) {
     if (AvailableAttr::isUnavailable(ext))
       return false;
   }

Diff for: test/Concurrency/concurrent_value_checking.swift

@@ -381,6 +381,14 @@ final class C7<T>: Sendable { }
 
 class C9: Sendable { } // expected-warning{{non-final class 'C9' cannot conform to 'Sendable'; use '@unchecked Sendable'}}
 
+@available(*, unavailable)
+extension HasUnavailableSendable : @unchecked Sendable { }
+
+class HasUnavailableSendable {
+}
+
+class NoRestated: HasUnavailableSendable {} // okay
+
 @globalActor
 struct SomeActor {
   static let shared = A1()