Skip to content

Drop JSR305 support in favor of JSpecify #45591

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
philwebb opened this issue May 16, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Drop JSR305 support in favor of JSpecify #45591

philwebb opened this issue May 16, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement A general enhancement
Milestone
4.0.x

Comments

@philwebb
Copy link
Member

We should see what breaks if we remove "com.google.code.findbugs:jsr305"
@philwebb philwebb added type: enhancement A general enhancement for: team-meeting An issue we'd like to discuss as a team to make progress labels May 16, 2025
@philwebb philwebb added this to the 4.0.x milestone May 16, 2025
@philwebb philwebb removed the for: team-meeting An issue we'd like to discuss as a team to make progress label May 21, 2025
@snicoll snicoll changed the title Consider dropping jsr305 support Drop JSR305 support in favor of JSpecify May 22, 2025
@dmytrodanilenkov
Copy link
Contributor

in scope of this issue do you want just drop or replace jsr305?

@philwebb philwebb added the status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed label May 26, 2025
@philwebb
Copy link
Member Author

We're not totally sure yet. I've added the "pending design work" label to make it clearer that we're not ready to accept contributions yet for this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
status: pending-design-work Needs design work before any code can be developed type: enhancement A general enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
4.0.x
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@philwebb @dmytrodanilenkov