Unit test generated by RoostGPT #21

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open

harishagrawal wants to merge 1 commit into main from roost-d3b7352c-f939-477d-8827-7791f3d0b226

AI Code Reviewer/requirements.txt

-Original file line number
+Diff line change
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
-    ast
-    pycodestyle
+    AI_Code_Reviewer
+    pycodestyle
+    pytest

AI Code Reviewer/test_CodeReviewerAnalyzePythonCode.py

-Original file line number
+Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
+    # ********RoostGPT********
+    """
+    Test generated by RoostGPT for test python-ai-codereviewer using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4-turbo
+    ROOST_METHOD_HASH=analyze_python_code_d3e4d47a3c
+    ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=analyze_python_code_9a11aca9e3
+    ### Scenario 1: Valid Python Code with Proper Indentation and Definitions
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_valid_python_code_no_feedback
+      Description: Ensure that properly formatted Python code with correct indentation, defined variables, and good comments does not generate any feedback.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a valid Python code snippet.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the code snippet.
+      Assert: Check that the feedback list remains empty.
+    Validation:
+      Validates that the function correctly identifies well-formatted code and that no unnecessary feedback is given, aligning with the function's purpose to find issues.
+    ### Scenario 2: Python Code with Syntax Errors
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_syntax_error_handling
+      Description: Verify that the function correctly identifies syntax errors and provides appropriate feedback.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a Python code snippet with a deliberate syntax error.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the erroneous code.
+      Assert: Check that the feedback contains a message about the syntax error.
+    Validation:
+      Ensures that syntax errors are caught and reported, which is crucial for a code analysis tool to prevent runtime errors.
+    ### Scenario 3: Indentation Errors in Function Definitions
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_indentation_error_in_function
+      Description: Check if indentation errors within Python functions are detected and reported.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a Python code snippet where a function's body is incorrectly indented.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the code.
+      Assert: Check that the feedback includes an indentation error message for the function.
+    Validation:
+      Tests the ability of the function to detect common logical errors in Python code, ensuring code quality and maintainability.
+    ### Scenario 4: Undefined Variable Usage
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_undefined_variable_usage
+      Description: Verify that the use of undefined variables is detected and reported.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a Python code snippet that uses a variable before it is defined.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the code.
+      Assert: Check that the feedback includes a message about the undefined variable.
+    Validation:
+      Critical for ensuring that all variables are defined before use, which is a basic requirement for functional code.
+    ### Scenario 5: Code Style Issues Detected by pycodestyle
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_code_style_issues_detection
+      Description: Ensure that code style issues are detected using pycodestyle and appropriate feedback is given.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a Python code snippet with style issues like missing whitespace around operators.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the code.
+      Assert: Check that feedback includes a message about code style issues.
+    Validation:
+      Validates the integration with pycodestyle and the ability to enforce PEP 8 code style standards, promoting better code readability and maintainability.
+    ### Scenario 6: Inadequate Comment Style
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_inadequate_comment_style
+      Description: Test if comments without space after the '#' or empty comments are flagged.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Provide a Python code snippet with one or more poorly formatted comments.
+      Act: Call the `analyze_python_code` function with the code.
+      Assert: Check that feedback includes messages pointing out the specific comment issues.
+    Validation:
+      Ensures that comments in the code meet a basic standard of readability and formatting, which is important for code maintainability.
+    These scenarios collectively ensure comprehensive testing of the `analyze_python_code` function, covering typical errors and style issues that developers might encounter.
+    """
+    # ********RoostGPT********
+    import pytest
+    from AI_Code_Reviewer.ai_code_reviewer import CodeReviewer
+    class Test_CodeReviewerAnalyzePythonCode:
+        @pytest.mark.valid
+        def test_valid_python_code_no_feedback(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            valid_code = """
+    def example_function():
+        # This is a well-commented function
+        variable = 123
+        print(variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(valid_code)
+            assert not code_reviewer.feedback, "Expected no feedback for valid Python code"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        @pytest.mark.syntax
+        def test_syntax_error_handling(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            code_with_syntax_error = """
+    def example_function()
+        variable = 123
+        print(variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(code_with_syntax_error)
+            assert any("Syntax Error" in feedback for feedback in code_reviewer.feedback), "Expected feedback about syntax error"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        @pytest.mark.negative
+        def test_indentation_error_in_function(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            code_with_indentation_error = """
+    def example_function():
+    variable = 123
+    print(variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(code_with_indentation_error)
+            assert any("Indentation Error" in feedback for feedback in code_reviewer.feedback), "Expected feedback about indentation error"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        @pytest.mark.negative
+        def test_undefined_variable_usage(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            code_with_undefined_variable = """
+    def example_function():
+        print(undeclared_variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(code_with_undefined_variable)
+            assert any("Variable 'undeclared_variable' is used but not defined" in feedback for feedback in code_reviewer.feedback), "Expected feedback about undefined variable"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        @pytest.mark.regression
+        def test_code_style_issues_detection(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            code_with_style_issues = """
+    def example_function():
+        variable=123  #Missing whitespace around operator
+        print(variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(code_with_style_issues)
+            assert any("Code style issues found" in feedback for feedback in code_reviewer.feedback), "Expected feedback about code style issues"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        @pytest.mark.regression
+        def test_inadequate_comment_style(self):
+            code_reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            code_with_poor_comments = """
+    def example_function():
+        #bad comment
+        # anotherbadcomment
+        variable = 123
+        print(variable)
+    """
+            code_reviewer.analyze_python_code(code_with_poor_comments)
+            assert any("Improve comment style" in feedback for feedback in code_reviewer.feedback), "Expected feedback about comment style issues"

AI Code Reviewer/test_CodeReviewerCheckCodeStyle.py

-Original file line number
+Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+    # ********RoostGPT********
+    """
+    Test generated by RoostGPT for test python-ai-codereviewer using AI Type Open AI and AI Model gpt-4-turbo
+    ROOST_METHOD_HASH=_check_code_style_1512c7e89b
+    ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=_check_code_style_671231205e
+    ### Scenario 1: No Code Style Errors
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_check_code_style_no_errors
+      Description: Tests if the method correctly identifies that there are no code style errors in the provided code snippet.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Create an instance of the class and prepare a code snippet that adheres to the PEP8 style guide.
+      Act: Call the `_check_code_style` method with the compliant code snippet.
+      Assert: Verify that the `feedback` list remains empty.
+    Validation:
+      This test ensures that the method correctly identifies code snippets without style issues, which is crucial for not flagging compliant code as erroneous. It validates the method's ability to differentiate between compliant and non-compliant code.
+    ### Scenario 2: Code Style Errors Present
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_check_code_style_with_errors
+      Description: Tests if the method correctly identifies code style errors and appends an appropriate message to the feedback list.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Create an instance of the class and prepare a code snippet that violates the PEP8 style guide.
+      Act: Call the `_check_code_style` method with the non-compliant code snippet.
+      Assert: Verify that the `feedback` list contains the specific message about code style issues.
+    Validation:
+      This test ensures that the method can detect when a code snippet violates style guidelines and appropriately notifies the user. This is essential for guiding users to improve code quality and adhere to best practices.
+    ### Scenario 3: Empty Code Input
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_check_code_style_empty_code
+      Description: Verifies the behavior of the method when an empty string is passed as code.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Create an instance of the class and prepare an empty code snippet.
+      Act: Call the `_check_code_style` method with the empty string.
+      Assert: Check that the `feedback` list remains empty.
+    Validation:
+      This test checks the method's robustness in handling edge cases where no code is provided. Ensuring that no false positives (errors) are reported in such cases is critical for accurate feedback.
+    ### Scenario 4: Code with Multiple Style Errors
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_check_code_style_multiple_errors
+      Description: Tests the method's ability to handle a code snippet with multiple style errors and whether it still appends only one generic message to the feedback.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Create an instance of the class and prepare a code snippet with several PEP8 violations.
+      Act: Call the `_check_code_style` method with this code.
+      Assert: Verify that the feedback list contains only one entry about code style issues.
+    Validation:
+      This scenario is essential to ensure that the feedback mechanism does not overwhelm the user with multiple messages for a single check, maintaining a clear and concise feedback system.
+    ### Scenario 5: Non-String Code Input
+    Details:
+      TestName: test_check_code_style_non_string_input
+      Description: Evaluates the method's behavior when an object other than a string (like a list or a dict) is passed as code.
+    Execution:
+      Arrange: Create an instance of the class and prepare a non-string code input (e.g., a list).
+      Act: Call the `_check_code_style` method with the non-string input.
+      Assert: Expect an appropriate handling of the type error, ideally without crashing and without appending to the feedback.
+    Validation:
+      While Python is dynamically typed, this test ensures that the method can gracefully handle unexpected data types without causing runtime errors, which enhances the robustness of the application.
+    """
+    # ********RoostGPT********
+    import pytest
+    import pycodestyle
+    from AI_Code_Reviewer.ai_code_reviewer import CodeReviewer
+    class Test_CodeReviewerCheckCodeStyle:
+        @pytest.mark.valid
+        def test_check_code_style_no_errors(self):
+            reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            pep8_compliant_code = """
+    def example_function():
+        return 'hello, world'
+    """
+            reviewer._check_code_style(pep8_compliant_code)
+            assert len(reviewer.feedback) == 0, "Feedback should be empty for compliant code"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        def test_check_code_style_with_errors(self):
+            reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            non_compliant_code = """
+    def example_function():
+    return 'hello, world'
+    """
+            reviewer._check_code_style(non_compliant_code)
+            assert len(reviewer.feedback) == 1, "Feedback should contain exactly one message about style issues"
+            assert "Code style issues found" in reviewer.feedback[0], "Feedback message should mention code style issues"
+        @pytest.mark.negative
+        def test_check_code_style_empty_code(self):
+            reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            empty_code = ""
+            reviewer._check_code_style(empty_code)
+            assert len(reviewer.feedback) == 0, "Feedback should be empty for empty code input"
+        @pytest.mark.invalid
+        def test_check_code_style_multiple_errors(self):
+            reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            multiple_errors_code = """
+    def example_function():
+    return 'hello, world'
+     print('error')
+    """
+            reviewer._check_code_style(multiple_errors_code)
+            assert len(reviewer.feedback) == 1, "Feedback should contain only one message even with multiple errors"
+        @pytest.mark.negative
+        def test_check_code_style_non_string_input(self):
+            reviewer = CodeReviewer()
+            non_string_input = ["def example_function():", "    return 'hello, world'"]
+            with pytest.raises(TypeError):
+                reviewer._check_code_style(non_string_input)
+            assert len(reviewer.feedback) == 0, "Feedback should be empty when a non-string input is provided"

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Unit test generated by RoostGPT #21

Uh oh!

Diff view

Diff view

There are no files selected for viewing

Uh oh!

Unit test generated by RoostGPT #21

Are you sure you want to change the base?

Uh oh!

Unit test generated by RoostGPT #21

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Diff view

Diff view

There are no files selected for viewing

Uh oh!