We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Since the new ReScript allows spreading variants in the definitions, should we also be able to match them like polymorphic variants?
type ex1A = [#X | #Y] type ex1B = [#Z] type ex1 = [ex1A | ex1B] let ex1 = (x: ex1) => switch x { | #...ex1A => "A" | #...ex1B => "B" }
type ex2A = X | Y type ex2B = Z type ex2 = | ...ex2A | ...ex2B let ex2 = (x: ex2) => switch x { | _ => "???" }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It'd definitely be great. Related: #6273 (reply in thread)
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Since the new ReScript allows spreading variants in the definitions, should we also be able to match them like polymorphic variants?
Polymorphic variants
Variants with spread
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: