Suggestion: Developer-friendly “Copilot API Sandbox” for software development and testing #178887
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Right now, Copilot is tightly integrated with IDEs, but not exposed in a way that supports iterative prototyping or custom tool integration. Having a developer sandbox API — even with strict quotas — would make a big difference for testing, SDK development, and local automation experiments. From a technical standpoint, this could work similarly to: GitHub’s REST or GraphQL APIs, where authenticated users get limited rate-limited access. OpenAI’s free dev environments, where token limits help prevent abuse but still allow experimentation. A Copilot-specific endpoint that mirrors /v1/chat/completions, returning lightweight metadata (like model, token count, latency) for testing. It would also make CI/CD and plugin development for Copilot integrations much easier — teams could test behavior in staging without burning production API costs. This could even align with GitHub’s Education and Student programs — offering a sandbox key automatically for verified users. I fully support this idea. A Copilot Developer Sandbox API would make GitHub’s AI tooling more consistent, accessible, and innovation-friendly across the entire development lifecycle. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
At the moment, developers often pay three times for access to the same underlying models:
GitHub Copilot in VS Code (for IDE assistance)
ChatGPT Plus (for web/chat interaction)
OpenAI / Azure / Gemini API (for software development)
However, there is currently no way to use a temporary or limited API endpoint within VS Code or GitHub Copilot to build and test software before purchasing a commercial API plan.
Problem:
Copilot does not provide a programmable local or cloud sandbox API.
Developers must use paid API keys right away, making testing and prototyping expensive and cumbersome.
There is no clear “dev-to-prod” path like we have with other tools (e.g., SQLite → Postgres, Firebase Emulator → Live).
Proposal:
Add a “Copilot Developer Sandbox API” with the following properties:
OpenAI-compatible endpoint (e.g., /v1/chat/completions)
Limited token quota or throttle (e.g., 150 requests per day)
Intended for development and testing only, accessible on local networks
Automatically available for Copilot subscribers
Benefits:
One unified ecosystem — developers can build and test locally, then scale commercially.
Less fragmentation (no need to pay separately for Copilot, ChatGPT, and the API).
Encourages broader adoption and deeper integration of Copilot within development tools.
Summary:
This would significantly improve the developer ecosystem around Copilot and bridge the gap between the AI assistant in the IDE and the AI API in production.
Developers who support this idea or have additional suggestions (e.g., integration with Gemini or OpenAI dev sandboxes), please comment or upvote so the Copilot team can see that there is real demand for this feature.
Community context / related discussions
There is clear and repeated interest in a Copilot API or sandbox endpoint — this has been requested multiple times before by other developers:
#64719 – GitHub Copilot API documentation
#112339 – Using Copilot Chat API programmatically
These previous threads show there is an ongoing demand for a Copilot Developer Sandbox API that would enable local or limited API testing before moving to a paid production model.
Adding this capability would unify Copilot’s ecosystem — bridging the gap between IDE assistance, web chat, and commercial API usage — and would make development more accessible and developer-friendly overall.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions