Claude 4

Author: Lech

comments_by_llm_1to6/q1/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 1, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 1, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=7.6)

comments_by_llm_1to6/q2/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 2, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 2, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=7.3)

comments_by_llm_1to6/q3/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 3, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 3, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=8.2)

comments_by_llm_1to6/q4/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 4, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 4, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=7.8)

comments_by_llm_1to6/q5/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 5, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 5, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=6.4)

comments_by_llm_1to6/q6/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# Comments for Question 6, LLM=Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K
+# Comments for Question 6, LLM=Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K
 
 == Grader: Claude 3.7 Sonnet ==
   * grade_story_102.txt (grade=7.4)

general_summaries/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt
-Certainly! Here’s a concise, tough-minded overall evaluation of Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K across these six writing tasks, followed by non-obvious insights and patterns.
+Certainly! Here’s a concise, tough-minded overall evaluation of Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K across these six writing tasks, followed by non-obvious insights and patterns.
 
 ---
 
 ## OVERALL EVALUATION
 
-Across these six tasks, *Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K* demonstrates remarkable competence and versatility in adhering to prompt constraints, delivering consistently coherent, structurally sound, and inventively imagined stories. The model’s strengths are most evident in its command of atmosphere and sensory detail: settings are vivid, thematically resonant, and often serve as active agents in the narrative. Cohesion and element integration are generally robust—even with arbitrary or disparate prompts, the stories rarely feel like incoherent jumbles. The output is unfailingly readable and frequently displays moments of striking metaphor, original conceptual premises, and satisfyingly circular plot architecture.
+Across these six tasks, *Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K* demonstrates remarkable competence and versatility in adhering to prompt constraints, delivering consistently coherent, structurally sound, and inventively imagined stories. The model’s strengths are most evident in its command of atmosphere and sensory detail: settings are vivid, thematically resonant, and often serve as active agents in the narrative. Cohesion and element integration are generally robust—even with arbitrary or disparate prompts, the stories rarely feel like incoherent jumbles. The output is unfailingly readable and frequently displays moments of striking metaphor, original conceptual premises, and satisfyingly circular plot architecture.
 
 Yet, certain critical weaknesses persist across the board. Emotional depth and psychological realism are routinely sacrificed in favor of thematic statement or “writerly” conceptual cleverness. Characters, though likable and distinct on the surface, remain prisoners of mechanical motivation, rarely embodying the messy contradictions or earned growth that signal true literary achievement. Plots—no matter how energetic or imaginative—tend to resolve too quickly, sidestepping genuine complication, risk, or consequence, with revelations arrived at through assertion rather than dramatized struggle. Figurative language, while ambitious, often lapses into overwrought abstraction or decorative cleverness that distracts from psychological truth.
 
@@ -29,4 +29,4 @@ A recurring pattern is the prioritization of syntax, motif, or philosophical flo
 
 ---
 
-**In sum:** Claude Opuis 4 exhibits a formidable technical toolkit and imaginative reach, but its fiction rarely transcends the sum of its parts—making it ideal for producing polished, cohesive, and smartly evocative flash writing, but less convincing when psychological risk, emotional ambiguity, or truly original narrative thinking are required.
+**In sum:** Claude Opus 4 exhibits a formidable technical toolkit and imaginative reach, but its fiction rarely transcends the sum of its parts—making it ideal for producing polished, cohesive, and smartly evocative flash writing, but less convincing when psychological risk, emotional ambiguity, or truly original narrative thinking are required.

summaries/q3/claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 claude-opus-4-20250514-16K.txt
-Certainly! Here’s a concise but tough-minded summary (with sample LLM quotes) of the recurring themes, strengths, and critical weaknesses from the grader comments for Question 3 (focusing on LLM “Claude Opuis 4 Thinking 16K”—but no mention of graders themselves):
+Certainly! Here’s a concise but tough-minded summary (with sample LLM quotes) of the recurring themes, strengths, and critical weaknesses from the grader comments for Question 3 (focusing on LLM “Claude Opus 4 Thinking 16K”—but no mention of graders themselves):
 
 ---