Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
1204 lines (833 loc) · 36.9 KB

categorical.rst

File metadata and controls

1204 lines (833 loc) · 36.9 KB

{{ header }}

Categorical data

This is an introduction to pandas categorical data type, including a short comparison with R's factor.

Categoricals are a pandas data type corresponding to categorical variables in statistics. A categorical variable takes on a limited, and usually fixed, number of possible values (categories; levels in R). Examples are gender, social class, blood type, country affiliation, observation time or rating via Likert scales.

In contrast to statistical categorical variables, categorical data might have an order (e.g. 'strongly agree' vs 'agree' or 'first observation' vs. 'second observation'), but numerical operations (additions, divisions, ...) are not possible.

All values of categorical data are either in categories or np.nan. Order is defined by the order of categories, not lexical order of the values. Internally, the data structure consists of a categories array and an integer array of codes which point to the real value in the categories array.

The categorical data type is useful in the following cases:

  • A string variable consisting of only a few different values. Converting such a string variable to a categorical variable will save some memory, see :ref:`here <categorical.memory>`.
  • The lexical order of a variable is not the same as the logical order ("one", "two", "three"). By converting to a categorical and specifying an order on the categories, sorting and min/max will use the logical order instead of the lexical order, see :ref:`here <categorical.sort>`.
  • As a signal to other Python libraries that this column should be treated as a categorical variable (e.g. to use suitable statistical methods or plot types).

See also the :ref:`API docs on categoricals<api.arrays.categorical>`.

Object creation

Series creation

Categorical Series or columns in a DataFrame can be created in several ways:

By specifying dtype="category" when constructing a Series:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")
    s

By converting an existing Series or column to a category dtype:

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({"A": ["a", "b", "c", "a"]})
    df["B"] = df["A"].astype('category')
    df

By using special functions, such as :func:`~pandas.cut`, which groups data into discrete bins. See the :ref:`example on tiling <reshaping.tile.cut>` in the docs.

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({'value': np.random.randint(0, 100, 20)})
    labels = ["{0} - {1}".format(i, i + 9) for i in range(0, 100, 10)]

    df['group'] = pd.cut(df.value, range(0, 105, 10), right=False, labels=labels)
    df.head(10)

By passing a :class:`pandas.Categorical` object to a Series or assigning it to a DataFrame.

.. ipython:: python

    raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"], categories=["b", "c", "d"],
                             ordered=False)
    s = pd.Series(raw_cat)
    s
    df = pd.DataFrame({"A": ["a", "b", "c", "a"]})
    df["B"] = raw_cat
    df

Categorical data has a specific category :ref:`dtype <basics.dtypes>`:

.. ipython:: python

    df.dtypes

DataFrame creation

Similar to the previous section where a single column was converted to categorical, all columns in a DataFrame can be batch converted to categorical either during or after construction.

This can be done during construction by specifying dtype="category" in the DataFrame constructor:

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')}, dtype="category")
    df.dtypes

Note that the categories present in each column differ; the conversion is done column by column, so only labels present in a given column are categories:

.. ipython:: python

    df['A']
    df['B']


.. versionadded:: 0.23.0

Analogously, all columns in an existing DataFrame can be batch converted using :meth:`DataFrame.astype`:

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')})
    df_cat = df.astype('category')
    df_cat.dtypes

This conversion is likewise done column by column:

.. ipython:: python

    df_cat['A']
    df_cat['B']


Controlling behavior

In the examples above where we passed dtype='category', we used the default behavior:

  1. Categories are inferred from the data.
  2. Categories are unordered.

To control those behaviors, instead of passing 'category', use an instance of :class:`~pandas.api.types.CategoricalDtype`.

.. ipython:: python

    from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"])
    cat_type = CategoricalDtype(categories=["b", "c", "d"],
                                ordered=True)
    s_cat = s.astype(cat_type)
    s_cat

Similarly, a CategoricalDtype can be used with a DataFrame to ensure that categories are consistent among all columns.

.. ipython:: python

    from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
    df = pd.DataFrame({'A': list('abca'), 'B': list('bccd')})
    cat_type = CategoricalDtype(categories=list('abcd'),
                                ordered=True)
    df_cat = df.astype(cat_type)
    df_cat['A']
    df_cat['B']

Note

To perform table-wise conversion, where all labels in the entire DataFrame are used as categories for each column, the categories parameter can be determined programmatically by categories = pd.unique(df.to_numpy().ravel()).

If you already have codes and categories, you can use the :func:`~pandas.Categorical.from_codes` constructor to save the factorize step during normal constructor mode:

.. ipython:: python

    splitter = np.random.choice([0, 1], 5, p=[0.5, 0.5])
    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical.from_codes(splitter,
                                            categories=["train", "test"]))


Regaining original data

To get back to the original Series or NumPy array, use Series.astype(original_dtype) or np.asarray(categorical):

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"])
    s
    s2 = s.astype('category')
    s2
    s2.astype(str)
    np.asarray(s2)

Note

In contrast to R's factor function, categorical data is not converting input values to strings; categories will end up the same data type as the original values.

Note

In contrast to R's factor function, there is currently no way to assign/change labels at creation time. Use categories to change the categories after creation time.

CategoricalDtype

.. versionchanged:: 0.21.0

A categorical's type is fully described by

  1. categories: a sequence of unique values and no missing values
  2. ordered: a boolean

This information can be stored in a :class:`~pandas.api.types.CategoricalDtype`. The categories argument is optional, which implies that the actual categories should be inferred from whatever is present in the data when the :class:`pandas.Categorical` is created. The categories are assumed to be unordered by default.

.. ipython:: python

   from pandas.api.types import CategoricalDtype
   CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'])
   CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=True)
   CategoricalDtype()

A :class:`~pandas.api.types.CategoricalDtype` can be used in any place pandas expects a dtype. For example :func:`pandas.read_csv`, :func:`pandas.DataFrame.astype`, or in the Series constructor.

Note

As a convenience, you can use the string 'category' in place of a :class:`~pandas.api.types.CategoricalDtype` when you want the default behavior of the categories being unordered, and equal to the set values present in the array. In other words, dtype='category' is equivalent to dtype=CategoricalDtype().

Equality semantics

Two instances of :class:`~pandas.api.types.CategoricalDtype` compare equal whenever they have the same categories and order. When comparing two unordered categoricals, the order of the categories is not considered.

.. ipython:: python

   c1 = CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=False)

   # Equal, since order is not considered when ordered=False
   c1 == CategoricalDtype(['b', 'c', 'a'], ordered=False)

   # Unequal, since the second CategoricalDtype is ordered
   c1 == CategoricalDtype(['a', 'b', 'c'], ordered=True)

All instances of CategoricalDtype compare equal to the string 'category'.

.. ipython:: python

   c1 == 'category'

Warning

Since dtype='category' is essentially CategoricalDtype(None, False), and since all instances CategoricalDtype compare equal to 'category', all instances of CategoricalDtype compare equal to a CategoricalDtype(None, False), regardless of categories or ordered.

Description

Using :meth:`~DataFrame.describe` on categorical data will produce similar output to a Series or DataFrame of type string.

.. ipython:: python

    cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "c", "c", np.nan], categories=["b", "a", "c"])
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cat": cat, "s": ["a", "c", "c", np.nan]})
    df.describe()
    df["cat"].describe()

Working with categories

Categorical data has a categories and a ordered property, which list their possible values and whether the ordering matters or not. These properties are exposed as s.cat.categories and s.cat.ordered. If you don't manually specify categories and ordering, they are inferred from the passed arguments.

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")
    s.cat.categories
    s.cat.ordered

It's also possible to pass in the categories in a specific order:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"],
                  categories=["c", "b", "a"]))
    s.cat.categories
    s.cat.ordered

Note

New categorical data are not automatically ordered. You must explicitly pass ordered=True to indicate an ordered Categorical.

Note

The result of :meth:`~Series.unique` is not always the same as Series.cat.categories, because Series.unique() has a couple of guarantees, namely that it returns categories in the order of appearance, and it only includes values that are actually present.

.. ipython:: python

     s = pd.Series(list('babc')).astype(CategoricalDtype(list('abcd')))
     s

     # categories
     s.cat.categories

     # uniques
     s.unique()

Renaming categories

Renaming categories is done by assigning new values to the Series.cat.categories property or by using the :meth:`~pandas.Categorical.rename_categories` method:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"], dtype="category")
    s
    s.cat.categories = ["Group %s" % g for g in s.cat.categories]
    s
    s = s.cat.rename_categories([1, 2, 3])
    s
    # You can also pass a dict-like object to map the renaming
    s = s.cat.rename_categories({1: 'x', 2: 'y', 3: 'z'})
    s

Note

In contrast to R's factor, categorical data can have categories of other types than string.

Note

Be aware that assigning new categories is an inplace operation, while most other operations under Series.cat per default return a new Series of dtype category.

Categories must be unique or a ValueError is raised:

.. ipython:: python

    try:
        s.cat.categories = [1, 1, 1]
    except ValueError as e:
        print("ValueError:", str(e))

Categories must also not be NaN or a ValueError is raised:

.. ipython:: python

    try:
        s.cat.categories = [1, 2, np.nan]
    except ValueError as e:
        print("ValueError:", str(e))

Appending new categories

Appending categories can be done by using the :meth:`~pandas.Categorical.add_categories` method:

.. ipython:: python

    s = s.cat.add_categories([4])
    s.cat.categories
    s

Removing categories

Removing categories can be done by using the :meth:`~pandas.Categorical.remove_categories` method. Values which are removed are replaced by np.nan.:

.. ipython:: python

    s = s.cat.remove_categories([4])
    s

Removing unused categories

Removing unused categories can also be done:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "a"],
                  categories=["a", "b", "c", "d"]))
    s
    s.cat.remove_unused_categories()

Setting categories

If you want to do remove and add new categories in one step (which has some speed advantage), or simply set the categories to a predefined scale, use :meth:`~pandas.Categorical.set_categories`.

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["one", "two", "four", "-"], dtype="category")
    s
    s = s.cat.set_categories(["one", "two", "three", "four"])
    s

Note

Be aware that :func:`Categorical.set_categories` cannot know whether some category is omitted intentionally or because it is misspelled or (under Python3) due to a type difference (e.g., NumPy S1 dtype and Python strings). This can result in surprising behaviour!

Sorting and order

If categorical data is ordered (s.cat.ordered == True), then the order of the categories has a meaning and certain operations are possible. If the categorical is unordered, .min()/.max() will raise a TypeError.

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "a"], ordered=False))
    s.sort_values(inplace=True)
    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", "c", "a"]).astype(
        CategoricalDtype(ordered=True)
    )
    s.sort_values(inplace=True)
    s
    s.min(), s.max()

You can set categorical data to be ordered by using as_ordered() or unordered by using as_unordered(). These will by default return a new object.

.. ipython:: python

    s.cat.as_ordered()
    s.cat.as_unordered()

Sorting will use the order defined by categories, not any lexical order present on the data type. This is even true for strings and numeric data:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 1], dtype="category")
    s = s.cat.set_categories([2, 3, 1], ordered=True)
    s
    s.sort_values(inplace=True)
    s
    s.min(), s.max()


Reordering

Reordering the categories is possible via the :meth:`Categorical.reorder_categories` and the :meth:`Categorical.set_categories` methods. For :meth:`Categorical.reorder_categories`, all old categories must be included in the new categories and no new categories are allowed. This will necessarily make the sort order the same as the categories order.

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series([1, 2, 3, 1], dtype="category")
    s = s.cat.reorder_categories([2, 3, 1], ordered=True)
    s
    s.sort_values(inplace=True)
    s
    s.min(), s.max()

Note

Note the difference between assigning new categories and reordering the categories: the first renames categories and therefore the individual values in the Series, but if the first position was sorted last, the renamed value will still be sorted last. Reordering means that the way values are sorted is different afterwards, but not that individual values in the Series are changed.

Note

If the Categorical is not ordered, :meth:`Series.min` and :meth:`Series.max` will raise TypeError. Numeric operations like +, -, *, / and operations based on them (e.g. :meth:`Series.median`, which would need to compute the mean between two values if the length of an array is even) do not work and raise a TypeError.

Multi column sorting

A categorical dtyped column will participate in a multi-column sort in a similar manner to other columns. The ordering of the categorical is determined by the categories of that column.

.. ipython:: python

   dfs = pd.DataFrame({'A': pd.Categorical(list('bbeebbaa'),
                                           categories=['e', 'a', 'b'],
                                           ordered=True),
                       'B': [1, 2, 1, 2, 2, 1, 2, 1]})
   dfs.sort_values(by=['A', 'B'])

Reordering the categories changes a future sort.

.. ipython:: python

   dfs['A'] = dfs['A'].cat.reorder_categories(['a', 'b', 'e'])
   dfs.sort_values(by=['A', 'B'])

Comparisons

Comparing categorical data with other objects is possible in three cases:

  • Comparing equality (== and !=) to a list-like object (list, Series, array, ...) of the same length as the categorical data.
  • All comparisons (==, !=, >, >=, <, and <=) of categorical data to another categorical Series, when ordered==True and the categories are the same.
  • All comparisons of a categorical data to a scalar.

All other comparisons, especially "non-equality" comparisons of two categoricals with different categories or a categorical with any list-like object, will raise a TypeError.

Note

Any "non-equality" comparisons of categorical data with a Series, np.array, list or categorical data with different categories or ordering will raise a TypeError because custom categories ordering could be interpreted in two ways: one with taking into account the ordering and one without.

.. ipython:: python

    cat = pd.Series([1, 2, 3]).astype(
        CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True)
    )
    cat_base = pd.Series([2, 2, 2]).astype(
        CategoricalDtype([3, 2, 1], ordered=True)
    )
    cat_base2 = pd.Series([2, 2, 2]).astype(
        CategoricalDtype(ordered=True)
    )

    cat
    cat_base
    cat_base2

Comparing to a categorical with the same categories and ordering or to a scalar works:

.. ipython:: python

    cat > cat_base
    cat > 2

Equality comparisons work with any list-like object of same length and scalars:

.. ipython:: python

    cat == cat_base
    cat == np.array([1, 2, 3])
    cat == 2

This doesn't work because the categories are not the same:

.. ipython:: python

    try:
        cat > cat_base2
    except TypeError as e:
        print("TypeError:", str(e))

If you want to do a "non-equality" comparison of a categorical series with a list-like object which is not categorical data, you need to be explicit and convert the categorical data back to the original values:

.. ipython:: python

    base = np.array([1, 2, 3])

    try:
        cat > base
    except TypeError as e:
        print("TypeError:", str(e))

    np.asarray(cat) > base

When you compare two unordered categoricals with the same categories, the order is not considered:

.. ipython:: python

   c1 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['a', 'b'], ordered=False)
   c2 = pd.Categorical(['a', 'b'], categories=['b', 'a'], ordered=False)
   c1 == c2

Operations

Apart from :meth:`Series.min`, :meth:`Series.max` and :meth:`Series.mode`, the following operations are possible with categorical data:

Series methods like :meth:`Series.value_counts` will use all categories, even if some categories are not present in the data:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c", "c"],
                  categories=["c", "a", "b", "d"]))
    s.value_counts()

Groupby will also show "unused" categories:

.. ipython:: python

    cats = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "b", "b", "c", "c", "c"],
                          categories=["a", "b", "c", "d"])
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": [1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5]})
    df.groupby("cats").mean()

    cats2 = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "b", "b"], categories=["a", "b", "c"])
    df2 = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats2,
                        "B": ["c", "d", "c", "d"],
                        "values": [1, 2, 3, 4]})
    df2.groupby(["cats", "B"]).mean()


Pivot tables:

.. ipython:: python

    raw_cat = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "b", "b"], categories=["a", "b", "c"])
    df = pd.DataFrame({"A": raw_cat,
                       "B": ["c", "d", "c", "d"],
                       "values": [1, 2, 3, 4]})
    pd.pivot_table(df, values='values', index=['A', 'B'])

Data munging

The optimized pandas data access methods .loc, .iloc, .at, and .iat, work as normal. The only difference is the return type (for getting) and that only values already in categories can be assigned.

Getting

If the slicing operation returns either a DataFrame or a column of type Series, the category dtype is preserved.

.. ipython:: python

    idx = pd.Index(["h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n"])
    cats = pd.Series(["a", "b", "b", "b", "c", "c", "c"],
                     dtype="category", index=idx)
    values = [1, 2, 2, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": values}, index=idx)
    df.iloc[2:4, :]
    df.iloc[2:4, :].dtypes
    df.loc["h":"j", "cats"]
    df[df["cats"] == "b"]

An example where the category type is not preserved is if you take one single row: the resulting Series is of dtype object:

.. ipython:: python

    # get the complete "h" row as a Series
    df.loc["h", :]

Returning a single item from categorical data will also return the value, not a categorical of length "1".

.. ipython:: python

    df.iat[0, 0]
    df["cats"].cat.categories = ["x", "y", "z"]
    df.at["h", "cats"]  # returns a string

Note

The is in contrast to R's factor function, where factor(c(1,2,3))[1] returns a single value factor.

To get a single value Series of type category, you pass in a list with a single value:

.. ipython:: python

    df.loc[["h"], "cats"]

String and datetime accessors

The accessors .dt and .str will work if the s.cat.categories are of an appropriate type:

.. ipython:: python

    str_s = pd.Series(list('aabb'))
    str_cat = str_s.astype('category')
    str_cat
    str_cat.str.contains("a")

    date_s = pd.Series(pd.date_range('1/1/2015', periods=5))
    date_cat = date_s.astype('category')
    date_cat
    date_cat.dt.day

Note

The returned Series (or DataFrame) is of the same type as if you used the .str.<method> / .dt.<method> on a Series of that type (and not of type category!).

That means, that the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of a Series and the returned values from methods and properties on the accessors of this Series transformed to one of type category will be equal:

.. ipython:: python

    ret_s = str_s.str.contains("a")
    ret_cat = str_cat.str.contains("a")
    ret_s.dtype == ret_cat.dtype
    ret_s == ret_cat

Note

The work is done on the categories and then a new Series is constructed. This has some performance implication if you have a Series of type string, where lots of elements are repeated (i.e. the number of unique elements in the Series is a lot smaller than the length of the Series). In this case it can be faster to convert the original Series to one of type category and use .str.<method> or .dt.<property> on that.

Setting

Setting values in a categorical column (or Series) works as long as the value is included in the categories:

.. ipython:: python

    idx = pd.Index(["h", "i", "j", "k", "l", "m", "n"])
    cats = pd.Categorical(["a", "a", "a", "a", "a", "a", "a"],
                          categories=["a", "b"])
    values = [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cats, "values": values}, index=idx)

    df.iloc[2:4, :] = [["b", 2], ["b", 2]]
    df
    try:
        df.iloc[2:4, :] = [["c", 3], ["c", 3]]
    except ValueError as e:
        print("ValueError:", str(e))

Setting values by assigning categorical data will also check that the categories match:

.. ipython:: python

    df.loc["j":"k", "cats"] = pd.Categorical(["a", "a"], categories=["a", "b"])
    df
    try:
        df.loc["j":"k", "cats"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"],
                                                 categories=["a", "b", "c"])
    except ValueError as e:
        print("ValueError:", str(e))

Assigning a Categorical to parts of a column of other types will use the values:

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [1, 1, 1, 1, 1], "b": ["a", "a", "a", "a", "a"]})
    df.loc[1:2, "a"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"], categories=["a", "b"])
    df.loc[2:3, "b"] = pd.Categorical(["b", "b"], categories=["a", "b"])
    df
    df.dtypes

Merging

You can concat two DataFrames containing categorical data together, but the categories of these categoricals need to be the same:

.. ipython:: python

    cat = pd.Series(["a", "b"], dtype="category")
    vals = [1, 2]
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": cat, "vals": vals})
    res = pd.concat([df, df])
    res
    res.dtypes

In this case the categories are not the same, and therefore an error is raised:

.. ipython:: python

    df_different = df.copy()
    df_different["cats"].cat.categories = ["c", "d"]
    try:
        pd.concat([df, df_different])
    except ValueError as e:
        print("ValueError:", str(e))

The same applies to df.append(df_different).

See also the section on :ref:`merge dtypes<merging.dtypes>` for notes about preserving merge dtypes and performance.

Unioning

If you want to combine categoricals that do not necessarily have the same categories, the :func:`~pandas.api.types.union_categoricals` function will combine a list-like of categoricals. The new categories will be the union of the categories being combined.

.. ipython:: python

    from pandas.api.types import union_categoricals
    a = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])
    b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])
    union_categoricals([a, b])

By default, the resulting categories will be ordered as they appear in the data. If you want the categories to be lexsorted, use sort_categories=True argument.

.. ipython:: python

    union_categoricals([a, b], sort_categories=True)

union_categoricals also works with the "easy" case of combining two categoricals of the same categories and order information (e.g. what you could also append for).

.. ipython:: python

    a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)
    b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "a"], ordered=True)
    union_categoricals([a, b])

The below raises TypeError because the categories are ordered and not identical.

In [1]: a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"], ordered=True)
In [2]: b = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)
In [3]: union_categoricals([a, b])
Out[3]:
TypeError: to union ordered Categoricals, all categories must be the same

Ordered categoricals with different categories or orderings can be combined by using the ignore_ordered=True argument.

.. ipython:: python

    a = pd.Categorical(["a", "b", "c"], ordered=True)
    b = pd.Categorical(["c", "b", "a"], ordered=True)
    union_categoricals([a, b], ignore_order=True)

:func:`~pandas.api.types.union_categoricals` also works with a CategoricalIndex, or Series containing categorical data, but note that the resulting array will always be a plain Categorical:

.. ipython:: python

    a = pd.Series(["b", "c"], dtype='category')
    b = pd.Series(["a", "b"], dtype='category')
    union_categoricals([a, b])

Note

union_categoricals may recode the integer codes for categories when combining categoricals. This is likely what you want, but if you are relying on the exact numbering of the categories, be aware.

.. ipython:: python

   c1 = pd.Categorical(["b", "c"])
   c2 = pd.Categorical(["a", "b"])

   c1
   # "b" is coded to 0
   c1.codes

   c2
   # "b" is coded to 1
   c2.codes

   c = union_categoricals([c1, c2])
   c
   # "b" is coded to 0 throughout, same as c1, different from c2
   c.codes

Concatenation

This section describes concatenations specific to category dtype. See :ref:`Concatenating objects<merging.concat>` for general description.

By default, Series or DataFrame concatenation which contains the same categories results in category dtype, otherwise results in object dtype. Use .astype or union_categoricals to get category result.

.. ipython:: python

   # same categories
   s1 = pd.Series(['a', 'b'], dtype='category')
   s2 = pd.Series(['a', 'b', 'a'], dtype='category')
   pd.concat([s1, s2])

   # different categories
   s3 = pd.Series(['b', 'c'], dtype='category')
   pd.concat([s1, s3])

   pd.concat([s1, s3]).astype('category')
   union_categoricals([s1.array, s3.array])


Following table summarizes the results of Categoricals related concatenations.

arg1 arg2 result
category category (identical categories) category
category category (different categories, both not ordered) object (dtype is inferred)
category category (different categories, either one is ordered) object (dtype is inferred)
category not category object (dtype is inferred)

Getting data in/out

You can write data that contains category dtypes to a HDFStore. See :ref:`here <io.hdf5-categorical>` for an example and caveats.

It is also possible to write data to and reading data from Stata format files. See :ref:`here <io.stata-categorical>` for an example and caveats.

Writing to a CSV file will convert the data, effectively removing any information about the categorical (categories and ordering). So if you read back the CSV file you have to convert the relevant columns back to category and assign the right categories and categories ordering.

.. ipython:: python

    import io
    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical(['a', 'b', 'b', 'a', 'a', 'd']))
    # rename the categories
    s.cat.categories = ["very good", "good", "bad"]
    # reorder the categories and add missing categories
    s = s.cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium", "good", "very good"])
    df = pd.DataFrame({"cats": s, "vals": [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]})
    csv = io.StringIO()
    df.to_csv(csv)
    df2 = pd.read_csv(io.StringIO(csv.getvalue()))
    df2.dtypes
    df2["cats"]
    # Redo the category
    df2["cats"] = df2["cats"].astype("category")
    df2["cats"].cat.set_categories(["very bad", "bad", "medium",
                                    "good", "very good"],
                                   inplace=True)
    df2.dtypes
    df2["cats"]

The same holds for writing to a SQL database with to_sql.

Missing data

pandas primarily uses the value np.nan to represent missing data. It is by default not included in computations. See the :ref:`Missing Data section <missing_data>`.

Missing values should not be included in the Categorical's categories, only in the values. Instead, it is understood that NaN is different, and is always a possibility. When working with the Categorical's codes, missing values will always have a code of -1.

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan, "a"], dtype="category")
    # only two categories
    s
    s.cat.codes


Methods for working with missing data, e.g. :meth:`~Series.isna`, :meth:`~Series.fillna`, :meth:`~Series.dropna`, all work normally:

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(["a", "b", np.nan], dtype="category")
    s
    pd.isna(s)
    s.fillna("a")

Differences to R's factor

The following differences to R's factor functions can be observed:

  • R's levels are named categories.
  • R's levels are always of type string, while categories in pandas can be of any dtype.
  • It's not possible to specify labels at creation time. Use s.cat.rename_categories(new_labels) afterwards.
  • In contrast to R's factor function, using categorical data as the sole input to create a new categorical series will not remove unused categories but create a new categorical series which is equal to the passed in one!
  • R allows for missing values to be included in its levels (pandas' categories). Pandas does not allow NaN categories, but missing values can still be in the values.

Gotchas

Memory usage

The memory usage of a Categorical is proportional to the number of categories plus the length of the data. In contrast, an object dtype is a constant times the length of the data.

.. ipython:: python

   s = pd.Series(['foo', 'bar'] * 1000)

   # object dtype
   s.nbytes

   # category dtype
   s.astype('category').nbytes

Note

If the number of categories approaches the length of the data, the Categorical will use nearly the same or more memory than an equivalent object dtype representation.

.. ipython:: python

   s = pd.Series(['foo%04d' % i for i in range(2000)])

   # object dtype
   s.nbytes

   # category dtype
   s.astype('category').nbytes

Categorical is not a numpy array

Currently, categorical data and the underlying Categorical is implemented as a Python object and not as a low-level NumPy array dtype. This leads to some problems.

NumPy itself doesn't know about the new dtype:

.. ipython:: python

    try:
        np.dtype("category")
    except TypeError as e:
        print("TypeError:", str(e))

    dtype = pd.Categorical(["a"]).dtype
    try:
        np.dtype(dtype)
    except TypeError as e:
        print("TypeError:", str(e))

Dtype comparisons work:

.. ipython:: python

    dtype == np.str_
    np.str_ == dtype

To check if a Series contains Categorical data, use hasattr(s, 'cat'):

.. ipython:: python

    hasattr(pd.Series(['a'], dtype='category'), 'cat')
    hasattr(pd.Series(['a']), 'cat')

Using NumPy functions on a Series of type category should not work as Categoricals are not numeric data (even in the case that .categories is numeric).

.. ipython:: python

    s = pd.Series(pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 4]))
    try:
        np.sum(s)
        # same with np.log(s),...
    except TypeError as e:
        print("TypeError:", str(e))

Note

If such a function works, please file a bug at https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas!

dtype in apply

Pandas currently does not preserve the dtype in apply functions: If you apply along rows you get a Series of object dtype (same as getting a row -> getting one element will return a basic type) and applying along columns will also convert to object. NaN values are unaffected. You can use fillna to handle missing values before applying a function.

.. ipython:: python

    df = pd.DataFrame({"a": [1, 2, 3, 4],
                       "b": ["a", "b", "c", "d"],
                       "cats": pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 2])})
    df.apply(lambda row: type(row["cats"]), axis=1)
    df.apply(lambda col: col.dtype, axis=0)

Categorical index

CategoricalIndex is a type of index that is useful for supporting indexing with duplicates. This is a container around a Categorical and allows efficient indexing and storage of an index with a large number of duplicated elements. See the :ref:`advanced indexing docs <indexing.categoricalindex>` for a more detailed explanation.

Setting the index will create a CategoricalIndex:

.. ipython:: python

    cats = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 4], categories=[4, 2, 3, 1])
    strings = ["a", "b", "c", "d"]
    values = [4, 2, 3, 1]
    df = pd.DataFrame({"strings": strings, "values": values}, index=cats)
    df.index
    # This now sorts by the categories order
    df.sort_index()

Side effects

Constructing a Series from a Categorical will not copy the input Categorical. This means that changes to the Series will in most cases change the original Categorical:

.. ipython:: python

    cat = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 10], categories=[1, 2, 3, 4, 10])
    s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat")
    cat
    s.iloc[0:2] = 10
    cat
    df = pd.DataFrame(s)
    df["cat"].cat.categories = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    cat

Use copy=True to prevent such a behaviour or simply don't reuse Categoricals:

.. ipython:: python

    cat = pd.Categorical([1, 2, 3, 10], categories=[1, 2, 3, 4, 10])
    s = pd.Series(cat, name="cat", copy=True)
    cat
    s.iloc[0:2] = 10
    cat

Note

This also happens in some cases when you supply a NumPy array instead of a Categorical: using an int array (e.g. np.array([1,2,3,4])) will exhibit the same behavior, while using a string array (e.g. np.array(["a","b","c","a"])) will not.