forked from fishercoder1534/Leetcode
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Copy path_173.java
98 lines (82 loc) · 3.13 KB
/
_173.java
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
package com.fishercoder.solutions;
import com.fishercoder.common.classes.TreeNode;
import java.util.LinkedList;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.Stack;
/**
* 173. Binary Search Tree Iterator
* Implement an iterator over a binary search tree (BST). Your iterator will be initialized with the root node of a BST.
* <p>
* Calling next() will return the next smallest number in the BST.
* <p>
* Note: next() and hasNext() should run in average O(1) time and uses O(h) memory, where h is the height of the tree.
*/
public class _173 {
public static class Solution1 {
public static class BSTIterator {
private Queue<Integer> queue;
/**
* My natural idea is to use a queue to hold all elements in the BST, traverse it while constructing the iterator, although
* this guarantees O(1) hasNext() and next() time, but it uses O(n) memory.
*/
//Cheers! Made it AC'ed at first shot! Praise the Lord! Practice does make perfect!
//I created a new class to do it using Stack to meet O(h) memory: {@link fishercoder.algorithms._173_using_stack}
public BSTIterator(TreeNode root) {
queue = new LinkedList<>();
if (root != null) {
dfs(root, queue);
}
}
private void dfs(TreeNode root, Queue<Integer> q) {
if (root.left != null) {
dfs(root.left, q);
}
q.offer(root.val);
if (root.right != null) {
dfs(root.right, q);
}
}
/**
* @return whether we have a next smallest number
*/
public boolean hasNext() {
return !queue.isEmpty();
}
/**
* @return the next smallest number
*/
public int next() {
return queue.poll();
}
}
}
public static class Solution2 {
public static class BSTIterator {
/**
* This is a super cool/clever idea: use a stack to store all the current left nodes of the BST, when pop(), we
* push all its right nodes into the stack if there are any.
* This way, we use only O(h) memory for this iterator, this is a huge saving when the tree is huge
* since h could be much smaller than n. Cheers!
*/
private Stack<TreeNode> stack;
public BSTIterator(TreeNode root) {
stack = new Stack();
pushToStack(root, stack);
}
private void pushToStack(TreeNode root, Stack<TreeNode> stack) {
while (root != null) {
stack.push(root);
root = root.left;
}
}
public boolean hasNext() {
return !stack.isEmpty();
}
public int next() {
TreeNode curr = stack.pop();
pushToStack(curr.right, stack);
return curr.val;
}
}
}
}