Laravel 5.8 support

[vladshoob]

Thanks for package and good work.

We need to update the package to support Laravel 5.8. Probably there might be some not-compabilities.

[edgrosvenor]

It looks like there's a pull request already to handle this.

[toddhulsman]

Any updates on this? I'm in the same boat with needing to install this on version 5.8. Thanks!

[stickeegreg]

For now, you can add this to your composer.json

    "repositories": [
        {
            "type": "vcs",
            "url": "https://github.com/mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption"
        }
    ]

Then run
composer require mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption "dev-master#b664138259083dde56b4e718962ece5e26b81933"

[cypriotxx]

$ php -d memory_limit=-1 composer.phar require austinheap/laravel-database-encryption
Using version ^0.2.0 for austinheap/laravel-database-encryption
./composer.json has been updated
Loading composer repositories with package information
Updating dependencies (including require-dev)
Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

Problem 1
- Installation request for austinheap/laravel-database-encryption ^0.2.0 -> satisfiable by austinheap/laravel-database-encryption[v0.2.0].
- Conclusion: remove laravel/framework v5.8.17
- Conclusion: don't install laravel/framework v5.8.17
- austinheap/laravel-database-encryption v0.2.0 requires laravel/framework 5.5.|5.6.|5.7.* -> satisfiable by laravel/framework[5.5.x-dev, 5.6.x-dev, 5.7.x-dev].
- Can only install one of: laravel/framework[5.6.x-dev, v5.8.17].
- Can only install one of: laravel/framework[5.7.x-dev, v5.8.17].
- Can only install one of: laravel/framework[5.5.x-dev, v5.8.17].
- Installation request for laravel/framework (locked at v5.8.17, required as 5.8.*) -> satisfiable by laravel/framework[v5.8.17].

Installation failed, reverting ./composer.json to its original content.

$ php -d memory_limit=-1 composer.phar require mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption "dev-master#b664138259083dde56b4e718962ece5e26b81933"

[InvalidArgumentException]
Could not find a matching version of package mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption. Check the package spelling, your version c
onstraint and that the package is available in a stability which matches your minimum-stability (dev).

require [--dev] [--prefer-source] [--prefer-dist] [--no-progress] [--no-suggest] [--no-update] [--no-scripts] [--update-no-dev] [--update-with-dependencies] [--update-with-all-dependencies] [--ignore-platform-reqs] [--prefer-stable] [--prefer-lowest] [--sort-packages] [-o|--optimize-autoloader] [-a|--classmap-authoritative] [--apcu-autoloader] [--] []...

what do we do please ? thnx

[thiskbj]

@stickeegreg, I tried that on Laravel 5.8 and got this error:

[InvalidArgumentException]
Could not find a matching version of package mckibbe/laravel-database-encry
ption. Check the package spelling, your version constraint and that the pac
kage is available in a stability which matches your minimum-stability (dev)
.

[stickeegreg]

@katieben I edited my comment above - try that

[thiskbj]

@stickeegreg Thanks! Getting closer, it's down to this now:

Your requirements could not be resolved to an installable set of packages.

Problem 1
- Installation request for mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption dev-master#b664138259083dde56b4e718962ece5e26b81933 -> satisfiable by mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption[dev-master].
- Conclusion: remove paragonie/random_compat v9.99.99
- Conclusion: don't install paragonie/random_compat v9.99.99
- mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption dev-master requires paragonie/random_compat ^2.0 -> satisfiable by paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.0, v2.0.1, v2.0.10, v2.0.11, v2.0.12, v2.0.13, v2.0.14, v2.0.15, v2.0.16, v2.0.17, v2.0.18, v2.0.2, v2.0.3, v2.0.4, v2.0.5, v2.0.6, v2.0.7, v2.0.8, v2.0.9].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.0, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.1, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.10, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.11, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.12, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.13, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.14, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.15, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.16, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.17, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.18, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.2, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.3, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.4, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.5, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.6, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.7, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.8, v9.99.99].
- Can only install one of: paragonie/random_compat[v2.0.9, v9.99.99].
- Installation request for paragonie/random_compat (locked at v9.99.99) -> satisfiable by paragonie/random_compat[v9.99.99].

Installation failed, reverting ./composer.json to its original content.

[lanort]

As this package seems to be abandoned, I am now using this lightweight approach: https://laracasts.com/discuss/channels/laravel/encrypting-model-data

[RobertCordes]

If this package is indeed abandoned I think I’m screwed. I really hope @austinheap will find some time to update the package. 👍

[jangrimm]

@RobertCordes I forked the package awhile ago and implemented L5.8 compatibility. Works in a number of production systems, all good. I'll also keep care of the package in my repo. It's not available via Packagist, though.

[RobertCordes]

@jangrimm Thanks. Right now I'm using the fork from @mckibbe (https://github.com/mckibbe/laravel-database-encryption). Still, with this kind of core functionality it would be nice to have the original repo under active development. Not that I can think of any missing functionality :) But it would be nice to at least hear from @austinheap that this repo isn't completely abandoned. Otherwise there's always this feeling that some day things can go south. Maybe that's just me though.

[austinheap]

@jangrimm PRs are welcome.

@RobertCordes Not abandoned by any stretch. I'm not interested in accepting PRs that can't pass compliance, though. Apologies if that came off the wrong way.

[RobertCordes]

Hey @austinheap I’m so glad you’re still working on the project 😅 thanks!