You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the section Comparison of ModelingToolkit vs Equation-Based and Block Modeling Languages the subsection Comparison Against Modelica has a final bullet point that reads:
Modelica can be used to simulate ODE and DAE systems. ModelingToolkit.jl has a much more expansive set of system types, including nonlinear systems, SDEs, PDEs, and more.
I believe this should be adapted to read:
Modelica is designed for simulating ODE and DAE systems (which can include nonlinear dynamics). In contrast, ModelingToolkit.jl supports a much broader range of system types, including SDEs, PDEs, and more.
The current text misleadingly suggests Modelica might not be able to handle nonlinear systems. I find the adapted text clearer in this regard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That description is still missing the whole class of time-independent nonlinear systems, like mixed integer nonlinear programming problems. Probably a better description is:
Modelica is designed for simulating ODE and DAE systems (which can include nonlinear dynamics). In contrast, ModelingToolkit.jl supports a much broader range of system types, including SDEs, PDEs, time-independent nonlinear systems (e.g. various forms of optimization problems) and more.
In the section Comparison of ModelingToolkit vs Equation-Based and Block Modeling Languages the subsection Comparison Against Modelica has a final bullet point that reads:
I believe this should be adapted to read:
The current text misleadingly suggests Modelica might not be able to handle nonlinear systems. I find the adapted text clearer in this regard.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: