Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify Comparison Against Modelica section of the documentation with regard to nonlinear systems #3472

Closed
gwr69 opened this issue Mar 19, 2025 · 2 comments

Comments

@gwr69
Copy link

gwr69 commented Mar 19, 2025

In the section Comparison of ModelingToolkit vs Equation-Based and Block Modeling Languages the subsection Comparison Against Modelica has a final bullet point that reads:

Modelica can be used to simulate ODE and DAE systems. ModelingToolkit.jl has a much more expansive set of system types, including nonlinear systems, SDEs, PDEs, and more.

I believe this should be adapted to read:

Modelica is designed for simulating ODE and DAE systems (which can include nonlinear dynamics). In contrast, ModelingToolkit.jl supports a much broader range of system types, including SDEs, PDEs, and more.

The current text misleadingly suggests Modelica might not be able to handle nonlinear systems. I find the adapted text clearer in this regard.

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

That description is still missing the whole class of time-independent nonlinear systems, like mixed integer nonlinear programming problems. Probably a better description is:

Modelica is designed for simulating ODE and DAE systems (which can include nonlinear dynamics). In contrast, ModelingToolkit.jl supports a much broader range of system types, including SDEs, PDEs, time-independent nonlinear systems (e.g. various forms of optimization problems) and more.

@gwr69
Copy link
Author

gwr69 commented Mar 21, 2025

The improvement is what counts—you're the mathematician! Thanks. 😊

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants